Sup fellow robots

I'm not saying this place is any better for "high iq discussion", and that doesn't matter, because that's not what we're doing here.

>tranny who bans trannies
Now this is pod racing

implying i talked about "high iq discussion" in my last post.
yet you're still having a discussion.

>tranny calling out another tranny banning trannies.
makes you think hun .

Attached: 2lw3s44.png (309x263, 140K)

So what was the meaning of your post then? If you're not talking about "high iq discussion", then you're not really talking about what I'm talking about.

fuck traditionalism. that shit is so fucking boring. the only reason you yearn for this it is because you didn't grow up in a time without technology as prevalent as it is now.

R9K of all place certainly isn't the best for a discussion, let alone a high iq discussion.
Yet you choose to stay here, among people who understand you, the server is populated by fags from Jow Forums only and incels.
So, give it a try, or don't. It's top compfy though.
My point is, nothing will ever be "perfect", since, who's to say ?.

Attached: 0e8.png (923x713, 16K)

false, i love technology, nice try at the >muh psychology argument meme though faggot.

The only reason i want traditionalism is to have a wife and kids and ultrimately a futur for white children.
Technology is good, but it certainly shouldn't frame our moral, that of our forefather who had more than 2 kids prevails before any >rights or >muh freedom.

Attached: c0c.jpg (634x650, 45K)

But in this case I wasn't giving critique of the serve, only the implication of high IQ discussions happening there.

are you mentally handicapped?
>calls people faggots
>faggots not allowed
???

>false, i love technology, nice try at the >muh psychology argument meme though faggot.
i wasn't psychoanalyzing anything. traditionalism would literally entail that you forego any technology that promotes and spreads what you would consider degeneracy.
>The only reason i want traditionalism is to have a wife and kids and ultrimately a futur for white children.
lol nobody is prohibiting you from doing this. if you have to blame society because you can't land a wife, maybe it's you.

goddamn you fascist cucks are stupid.

you did gave a critique though.
the "presumption"that no iq discussion could ever take place on a discord server, by extention on ours too.

Attached: 85e.jpg (680x490, 83K)

>found the tranny.
back to dilating already

Attached: wall.jpg (1023x1024, 78K)

>lol nobody is prohibiting you from doing this. if you have to blame society because you can't land a wife, maybe it's you.

sure faggot, women not wanting to marry before having a master, a job, and wanting to rather ride the cock carousel meanwhile is on me.
women having less than 2 kids in all of the usa and europe is on me too you faggot.

>blame society.
you dumb faggot, the only reason women have less than 2 kids is due to them being allowed in higher education and ultimately high position job, this pattern can be seen in all of europe and the usa, same for north africa from 7 kids to 2,32 same in russia same in eastern europe.

>fascist cucks.
yeah you would rather live in a "democracy" you dumb tranny.

Attached: actually reading filenames.jpg (431x511, 55K)

>sure faggot, women not wanting to marry before having a master, a job, and wanting to rather ride the cock carousel meanwhile is on me.
sure it is. the moment you interject your opinion about how other people live their lives, it immediately becomes your issue. i don't have this problem.
>women having less than 2 kids in all of the usa and europe is on me too you faggot.
again, how does this involve you? why are you attempting to insert yourself into everyone's lives like you know what's best for them? you more than likely don't even earn enough to sustain a wife and two children while she stays at home. your reasoning is based in idealism. idealism is inherently flawed.
>the only reason women have less than 2 kids is due to them being allowed in higher education and ultimately high position job
let them get that cheddar booboo. it's not my fault you're not getting food, drinks, and clothing bought for you. i am. shit is cash. i barely spend any money.
>this pattern can be seen in all of europe and the usa, same for north africa from 7 kids to 2,32 same in russia same in eastern europe
which would be a logical conclusion to women wanting to get away from people like yourself. again, people like yourself are the issue here. reee harder.
>yeah you would rather live in a "democracy" you dumb tranny.
cope. you want to force people to live in your idealistic fantasy because you objectively cannot cope with not being as important as you think you are. i've got a box of tissues if you need them.

>the moment you interject your opinion about how other people live their lives.
so commiting a literal race genocide by not having 2 kids or more is ok ? as long as they live their life ???

that argument is dumb and it does concern me very much, we've seen an exponential growth of fatherless homes due to higher divorce rates these last decades, fatherless kids are more likely to commit crimes, thus it impact me directly, ie: i might be the one getting killed/robbed/shoot/beat-up and i'll have to pay taxes for these no-good trash whores kids instead of financing space exploration/hospitals etc....

that gives, the argument of
>muh let people live.
is wrong, and the way metaphysics frame a people will dictate it's near future and it's long term future, that is the one of this civilization, hence the one of my kids. dumb lefty.
>again, how does this involve you?.
as explained above, it's not about people it's about MY people, about MY country, and people certainly aren't happier now than with strict morals.
and strict morals don't need strict rules, they just need strict people.
>let them get that cheddar booboo.
the autist in that post, again for the third time, it's not about them it's about the whole society and this country's future.

>cope. you want to force people to live in your idealistic fantasy because you objectively cannot cope with not being as important as you think you are. i've got a box of tissues if you need them.
nice >muh psychology x anything argument meme.
Yet you still didn't disprove my point, the people will never have power, be it in a democracy or an authoritarian state, i don't care about other people lives again, i care about the future of the white race subjucated to these hedonistics fucks.
>muh authoritarian state bad.
you literally gave no arguments to why controlling peoples' live is a bad thing beside, muh freedom.

EVERY, LITERALLY EVERY country on earth has been created by a strong religious moral driven hierarchy.

Attached: smug muslim groyper.jpg (225x225, 7K)

>so commiting a literal race genocide by not having 2 kids or more is ok ? as long as they live their life ???
people themselves are deciding not to have two kids. it's not your choice. get over it.
>we've seen an exponential growth of fatherless homes due to higher divorce rates these last decades, fatherless kids are more likely to commit crimes
nonviolent crimes like smoke weed. also, it's not your life. nobody cares.
>thus it impact me directly, ie: i might be the one getting killed/robbed/shoot/beat-up and i'll have to pay taxes for these no-good trash whores kids instead of financing space exploration/hospitals etc...
then why aren't you amassing wealth so you can contribute money to these things? counter to this, why aren't you acquiring an education / job where you can directly participate in these things? you're essentially saying "i'm okay with socialism, but not like that."
>is wrong, and the way metaphysics frame a people will dictate it's near future and it's long term future, that is the one of this civilization, hence the one of my kids. dumb lefty.
if your hypothetical children cannot adapt to an evolving world, you've failed as a parent. full stop.
>it's not about people it's about MY people, about MY country
which you conveniently occupy with other races that say the same thing.
>and people certainly aren't happier now than with strict morals.
currently the US is under a right-wing government. nobody is happy, even conservicucks. gee... i wonder why?
>EVERY, LITERALLY EVERY country on earth has been created by a strong religious moral driven hierarchy.
excluding the united states, who happens to be the greatest nation this world has ever seen.

your entire argument in a nutshell:
>i care about the future of the white race subjucated to these hedonistics fucks
also you:
>you literally gave no arguments to why controlling peoples' live is a bad thing beside, muh freedom.
i don't need to make an argument if you already make it for me.

>nonviolent crimes like smoke weed. also, it's not your life. nobody cares.
perniciously evading the part where i talk about violent crimes.
>then why aren't you amassing wealth so you can contribute money to these things? counter to this, why aren't you acquiring an education / job where you can directly participate in these things?
nice assumption and yet another >Muh psychology x anything argument meme.
you don't know me in real life, the little you know about my ideas is in this thread dumb fag.
>you're essentially saying "i'm okay with socialism, but not like that.".
implying the goal of socialism is to take money from honest people and give it to criminals.
socialism can never work in a society where there is niggers, for the same reason they don't produce anything and make up the majority of crimes, all the money goes to the police/prisons etc.... So much so there is simply no money left for a free eduction which would benefit highly high iq poor people same for healthcare and any service.
>if your hypothetical children cannot adapt to an evolving world, you've failed as a parent. full stop.
the testosterone levels are skydiving, same for marriage rates while std's rates are going through the roof, same for unemployment etc...

this is not an evolving world, this is a regressing world you retard.
>currently the US is under a right-wing government. nobody is happy, even conservicucks. gee... i wonder why?.
If your idea of a right wing governement is the most massive immigration the usa has ever known, then sure we are living under a right wing governement, if your idea of right wing government is giving $4BILLION to israel then sure, it is a right wing government...ad infinitum, trump is a joke just like obama who received the peace nobel prize while dropping an average of 25,000 bombs per year and actively making wars in multiple countries.

> don't need to make an argument if you already make it for me.
So you LITERALLY gave NO arguments.
kek

Attached: 1429844474516.jpg (344x477, 44K)

>excluding the united states, who happens to be the greatest nation this world has ever seen.
Can you imagine how dumb you sound right now ?
take a one dollar bill, and read it.

Attached: 1565193735-1391468370-1343069213006.jpg (450x669, 57K)

>A law passed in a Joint Resolution by the 84th Congress (P.L. 84-140) and approved by President Dwight Eisenhower on July 30, 1956, requires that "In God We Trust" appear on American currency.

Attached: main_900.jpg (900x702, 109K)

this dude looks like such an insecure feminine faggot.

It's time to go back. Everything you have pointed out has demonstrated one thing about you: you lack the creativity, conviction, and intelligence to survive in the present world. Praying that things return to some semblance of "traditionalism" is cope for people that lack the mental wherewithal to progress in a world that is evolving. Just remember, only the strong survive. You won't make it out alive. Have fun being bred out of existence because you truly cannot recognize that the majority of your own people detest your perspective. You did this to yourselves.

>the motto is in use since the initial 1776 design of the Great Seal of the United States.[4]
>The capitalized form "IN GOD WE TRUST" first appeared on the two-cent piece in 1864[5] and has appeared on paper currency since 1957. A law passed in a Joint Resolution by the 84th Congress

AHAHAHAHAHAHHA the cope in this post jessu.

Attached: tenor.png (360x346, 142K)

>Jow Forums.
nice assumption faggot.
>Everything you have pointed out has demonstrated one thing about you.
the psychology meme again.
Keep assuming harder tranny and keep dilating.

Attached: Yeah+here+you+go+_5f25664d66beee75ee6c36dadabf898d.jpg (644x778, 106K)

>a world evolving.
"evolution" the process by which a creature an object strive easily as years goes on.
>less than 2 kids in every developped country.
nice evolution retard.

Attached: OffbeatThickAstrangiacoral-max-1mb.gif (280x210, 840K)

>t.bloatmaxxer

>"In God We Trust", also written as "In God we trust", is the official motto of the United States of America and of the U.S. state of Florida. It was adopted by the U.S. Congress in 1956, supplanting E pluribus unum, in use since the initial 1776 design of the Great Seal of the United States.
WAITWAITWAIT. WAIT HOL' UP. DID YOU SERIOUSLY CLIP OUT A PART OF THE STATEMENT YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND? FUCKING KEK.
t. obsolete white ""man"" that will be bred out of existence
>evolution only applies to developed nations
Imagine being this much of a brainlet.

>nigger slave's son whose ancestor didn't built a single civilization worhty of that name. Keep coping meanwhile the slave owner keeps breeding your race our of existence and europe/china keep stealing every ounce of your low iq country.
>nigger talking about evolution when the white race is the most evolved race on earth, creator of 99% of the philosophical/ art / real music works on earth
>nigger, literally every race sold you, arabs/persians/europeans even niggers sold niggers. hahahaha

ok nigger, now you decide to show your real face.
>breed out of existence.
sure, then we will get 400 years of slavery too ?
ahhaahah, keep coping nigger, you are literally a slave's son you fucking subhuman

dumb nigger low iq who can't reply jack shit to my arguments and my latest posts.
cope harder hahahah

Attached: pepelaughz.jpg (800x450, 40K)