Place yourself, and tell me why anons

Im a center right libertarian

Just go to Jow Forums and don't return.
Is this where Japan joined the Axis?

I think humanity is a virus and communism is its cure.

Attached: 1567014913045.png (543x591, 19K)

Pic related. Half bc its the fastest way to transhumanism

Attached: yes.png (800x800, 6K)

This makes me look far harder left than I am, I just believe in transparent social democracy with a solid safety net for society's most vulnerable

Attached: political compass.png (480x400, 17K)

based
Either extremely christian or obsessed with race.
If you truly believe that, just lead by example and kill yourself already, you miserable shit.
No, you're very hard left. Just accept that you've got extreme views instead of pretending they're "normal".

Attached: pol.png (480x400, 17K)

These political tests are shit anyways. I could be far righr economically, diehard supporting capitalism,.and be far left socially, supporting freedom.and equality for everyone, and it would slap me in the center because the 2 are on the same axis, politiscales is way better. Idk how youd get put in ancom for wanting socdem though, thats wack.

Authoritarian right because it's our only hope for survival

>If you truly believe that
It's for people, like (You), to who I dedicated my existence.

>Either extremely christian or obsessed with race.
Why not both?

>far righr economically, diehard supporting capitalism,.and be far left socially, supporting freedom.and equality for everyone
Kill yourself

You're not convincing anyone of anything by "dedicating" your worthless unproductive existence to people you call a virus.

But hey if you think communist authoritarianism brings out the best in people go right ahead.

I was giving an example you literal fucking cro-magnon
See "COULD BE" you retard.
Learn to fucking read before telling someone to an hero.

None. I don't think the political compass is a valid metric.

>politiscales
Yeah politiscales is pretty based
Here's mine, other anons take it and post yours, its way better than the shitty 4 quadrant thingy
See, he's based

Attached: Screenshot_20190828-145606.jpg (1355x2035, 489K)

>best in people
There is neither a best or a worst IN people, however there is a best and a worst person; if that was, what (You) meant.

>"dedicating"
I am an altruist. I don't want anything, but anyone to be equal; which is final, in nature.

Btw., I am not a dogmatic person; convince me, that I'm wrong about these views.

I used to be slightly left leaning, but I've gotten farther to the right. I don't know enough about economics to have particularly strong views on either side, but I'm working on changing that. As of now, my economic beliefs are that socialism and communism are bad, paying taxes for leeches is bad, and that the government should try to infringe on the people's freedom to buy and sell as little as possible.

Attached: 20190828_120742.png (542x590, 19K)

I like authoritarianism. I think that we should have put down the hippies back in the 1960s, then we would not have this mess

Attached: E13FC29E-692B-4EA6-B6BD-900F18D1CA57.png (480x400, 17K)

>There is neither a best or a worst IN people, however there is a best and a worst person; if that was, what (You) meant.
If there is no best or worse IN people (which implies people can change their behaviour), but rather "goodness" is an immutable quality inherent in the person, then how could communism change that? Is your final plan just to exterminate all the "worst people" to bring in the utopia?

>I am an altruist. I don't want anything, but anyone to be equal; which is final, in nature.
Wanting everyone to be equal is hardly selfless and altruistic (regardless of the dire consequences of total equality): you're imposing your subjective view on how people live their lives by force.

Also, what do you mean by "which is final, in nature"? Do you mean that equality is our natural state of being? That's objectively not true. Nature is ruthless and punishing, and natural selection is anything but "equal".

Attached: 1564057002548.jpg (1024x682, 69K)

Based. I agree.

origiggles

Third position because that's the only thing that makes sense.

Authleft is the best, authright is cool, but it has downsides, and i hate authleft.

Attached: Please_don't_kill_me_just_because_of_naming_files_differentely_than_you.png (480x400, 17K)

Ancap because anything else is boring and/or poor

Fukcing fuck shit fuck why can't I learn to speak for fucking fuck's sake I hate myself, I meant I hate libright i like authleft I have mega autism please forgive me please don't kill me

I'm for matriarchal monarchy so idk.

Libertarian right
segregation is good
and i want full societal collapse

>i have mega autism
>lib left

we know, user

Attached: 1565249859171.png (746x512, 99K)

I'm in the same boat as you user, but I'm noticing I'm moving to the left more now instead of the libertarian right. Northern European public schools are very good and don't put you 40k+ in debt. I think the ancap "privatise everything" fantasy is a little delusional.

Thank you for respecting my low intelligence fren (>^_^)>

A fellow man of culture i see
Everything else really is booring or poor.
Auth right? Proud but industrious bootlickers
Auth left? Administrators of the (mandatory) utopia of tomorrow! Lib left? A 3 year olds lazy description of an ideal world. Lib right is the only true one. Money is power, and authority is suppression. Thats all there is to it. Money is the power, morals gotta go.

Attached: based.jpg (1920x1080, 160K)

only based user here

fucking commies

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

Cuz i have big brain and all others are stupid

Attached: chart (2).png (480x400, 17K)

Fuckin A AnCap is shit. Minarcism bitches.
Military Police and EMS services only everything else private

if people are a disease then communism is a fucking bacteriophage

Based.

Agreed 100% comrade.

>best or worse IN people
I re-read (You)'r initial comment and I mistook the meaning. It is true, I do believe, that authoritarianism "betters" man; in as far as he gains strength. Communism is the initializer of this authoritarianism. Regarding "how": The authoritarian, i.e. power concentrated [!], elite naturally enforces this "betterment"; because it's the assurance for its power. Strong indiviuals guarantee a strong collective, which itself guarantees the power of the elite. The masses' "betterment" is, therefore, in the elite's own best interest. Communism, as I've said, and more precisely the Communist revolution, is the intitial spark, that ignites this dynamic. It's the (absolutely required) initiating quantum of control.

>exterminate all the "worst people"
Of course, not; I'm not a Nazi, but a Commie, after all; Worst people will exist, as long as people exist. I want to "better" those worst people, give them a "purpose" in their "betterment".

>utopia
Does not exist, I won't be fooling you. But, there definitely is a state of being, that is worse and that is better. And I intend, to "better" that state of being for all.

>"Dedication" and "Altruism"
The "Dedication" and "Altruism", I mentioned, was meant to be a taunt on the calculating cynicsm of people, who use these phrases in this context unironically.

>"which is final, in nature"
That was meant to be the punchline; because this Dedication" / "Altruism" leads to Death; which, y'know, is final, in nature. Ha!

Anyway:

>imposing your subjective view
That's not something bad, necessarily.

>equality is our natural state of being
Of course, not; well, during lifetime, at least.

>natural selection
Oh, I'm talking with an Anglo...

Besides that, I'd like to emphasize, that I do not believe, that is the "purpose" of human existence, to live long. The length of existence is irrelevant on it own, what matters, is the content of existence.
>youtu.be/s0TqYz85OKs

If you're talking about the American schools putting students 40k+ in debt, then you're actively talking about public schools.

To be honest, Northern European public schools function well because there's less government involvement (although they're still subsidized by the government). For instance, in Northern European countries, parents are free to choose whichever school they want, instead of being relegated to a government school district.

I'm not much into politics, what did I mean by this?

Attached: 1552460792052.jpgW.jpg (480x400, 23K)

>hurr im a milquetoast ancap but ill call ancaps bad
Lmao okay retard

If we take this at face value
>center rather than left or right
Moderate ideals and most likely support lassez-faire capitalism (economy regulates itself through supply and demand)
>up rather than down
Support a stronger state with more power over the citizens rather than a smaller state.

libertarian right. i dont care for most people and this gives us mosy freedom while maintaining civility i think.

I think your characterisation of how strong individuals guarantee a strong collective is flawed. If you look at history, you see time and time again that individual rights are curtailed in name of a "collective good", thereby weakening individuals. I hate to quote Alex Jones but "HITLER TOOK THE GUNS STALIN TOOK THE GUNS" definitely holds true. The collectivist elite fear strong individuals. It's easier to rule over a the weak and starving, rather than the independent and strong, like it is easier to tame a chihuahua than a pitbull.

>there definitely is a state of being, that is worse and that is better. And I intend, to "better" that state of being for all.
What if those you whose lives you wish to improve, disagree with you on what betterment is? How are you so sure you know what's best for all, even going to the point of forcing your ideology upon others? Shouldn't people be free to choose themselves what's best for them?

>(imposing your subjective view) is not something bad, necessarily.
Many people would disagree, saying that the very act of imposing something (inevitably by force) on the involuntary is definitely necessarily bad.

>Oh I'm talking with an Anglo...
Very much Dutch!

Anyhow, I'm curious about your opinion on communism's historical track record? It doesn't seem to have worked all that well, or was that not real communism?

Attached: 01c3910d14fc267eb6b39806eec33786201c09d0f6dafa7c8b6605e070be181d.jpg (524x400, 104K)

I WILL CURB YOUR ASS. Minarcism is superior in everyway to your dumbass meme govt. How the fuck is the Govt supposed to uphold mfuggin borders while systematically upholding christian values if we dont have a mailitary and police

I place myself far away from political fuckery. Imagine actually caring about politics. No, like seriously imagine. Do you think your vote matters? Do you think your OPINION matters? We're all puppets for ((((them)))) and theres nothing we can do but fool ourselves into thinking we have control over the world. Which we dont.

Attached: ballbusting_comix___typical_anime_girl_by_yokobb_dausqo7-fullview.jpg (1024x725, 109K)

Edit: wanted to include this, felt rude to not return the favour of including some nice music to sign things off ;)
youtube.com/watch?v=r_xIvlUYyPc

based truth right here

Attached: a5f4174.png (2000x2177, 392K)

Centre but leaning more towards the right. I guess I'm just a boring fencesitter. Don't necessarily agree with some leftie stuff but I generally don't feel particularly strongly affiliated with either major side.

Nigger thats dumb baseless bullshit i cant be 3 things at once

>ITT: Spooked

Attached: brainlets need not apply.png (500x490, 411K)

>christian values
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA
>hold up the borders
The citizens do. Illegal immigration is a violation of the NAP and will be dealt with accordingly.

Looks like we got some purging to do

>hurr ill purge you
T. Milquetoast ancap who only wants a state to put in christian values and defend borders even though citizens could defend their own fucking borders without paying theft (aka tax) and a state thats strong enough to spread christian values in any meaningful way isnt even close to minarchism anymore you're basically a monarchist who latched onto the ancap ideology because you thought it would make you seem cooler

>It's easier to rule over a the weak, rather than the strong
Foreign powers refute this. Even if foreign powers didn't exist, it'd corrupt and destruct the society; all people, strong and weak, would rot. They weak, as they're being oppressed and tyrannized, and the strong, as they indulge in luxury and leisure; this rotten society would collapse in the slightest event of inevitable chaos; spawning a revolution and completing the circle:
>youtu.be/AFckPkukF7g
>youtu.be/nS5_EQgbuLc
Rome is the best example, I know, for this scenario. There is a reason, why Italians are unrecognizable.

>individual rights
"Rights" can be corruptive, too; porn, alcohol, tabacco, they are allowed, are a "right" to a "free" citizens, but they corrupt, weaken, those citizens. They should've never been allowed, should've never been a "right".

>how do I know
Well, we're currently discussing it.

>Shouldn't people be free
No, people "shouldn't" be free; because people aren't free. In fact, they aren't free, because they can't be free. There is no "freedom", at all, but systems of control. Some of them are better and some of them are worse. I believe, to have found the best system. A system, that's the best for all. Communism.

>people would disagree
How to stop a criminal? By force. There is individual behavior, that is detrimental to the collective; the collective, therefore, should impose its objectively best "views" onto the individuals, to prevent this detrimental behavior. I believe, these objectively best "views" are on a par with my own.

>Dutch
Well, more English than me.

>historical communism
In fact, I believe communism to have "worked" well; it spawned powerful nations, of which the former USSR and China are the most remarkable.

Attached: 1518722116417.jpg (995x1284, 397K)

>loves mia khalifa
wat

boomerism only sustainable and wise political view on spectrum

Whole lotta nazi faggots, big surprise there

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

>t. Gay for che
Ive seen more lib rights than auth rights, i doubt there are many nazis. Unless of course like typical commies you think anyone right of demsoc is a nazi. If thats the case may i remind you of hoppeanism and free helicopter rides that come with such retardedness?

Baseless faggot doesnt even understand the full value of a state
The very simple fact to protect its citizens from themselves for one you mong

>"the state needs to protect the citizens from themselves!"
>"bro im a minarchist bro!"
Holy fuck lmao

this is the most retarded thing I've ever heard

>I'm gonna genocide the libs

Attached: download.png (220x229, 9K)

Yes dipshit minarchist for the govt
They govt is too damn big fool prove me wrong. Do IT

Im "fuck with me and eat a bullet faggot". What does that make me?

chad centrist because the questions in test are too general and i belive every case needs different approach

Attached: chad centrist.png (656x563, 24K)

Top left.
Hate faggots, hate trannies, hate women, hate smug liberal urbanite intellectuals, hate cringe neocons, hate bugmen, love my bros, love my family, love my home. Simple as.

Attached: 1566816715632.png (693x598, 201K)

Lmao
>download.png
>reddit tier meme
>assuming im a magatard
well played retard, well played. Apparently you have no idea what hoppeanism is so ill just assume the picture is a self portrait and ask you find your way back to rhe ESE classroom

Eat shit Jow Forumstards

Attached: 543pxPolitical_Compass_yellow_LibRight.svg.jpg (543x591, 53K)

>t. Retard whos only left leaning because of moralfagging and a lack of fundamental economic knowledge and understanding
Hows it feel being a tool for your (((glorious leaders)))?

>I read Hoppe's wikipedia page

Attached: download.jpg (500x530, 64K)

>Capitalism good
>Hows it feel being a tool for your (((glorious leaders)))?

>can only respond in strawmen
Well i didnt expect better.

It makes you underage.

Capitalism:
>wow im free to choose where i work and can be paid more if i can do work with high demand or skill level!
Communism:
>well the government tells me where i have to work and because of "to each according to their needs" i only get the bare minimum, but atleast im not a slave to the machine
Glorious ancapistan:
>i am free to make money in any way. No state to take my money, no state to tell me where to work or to give my money to others. I am as free as the economy and can make money in whatever wayni desire to as long as it doesnt violate the NAP. No one can keep me down
See the folly of your ways, join glorious ancapistan, or perish at the hands of the ghost of a brazillian helicopter enthusiast

bottom right desu

Why should I respond any differently? Hoppe is the most contradictory ""philosopher"" of all time and his ""ideology"" is designed solely for edgy suburbanite 14-year-old faggots who think "free helicopter ride" is the pinnacle of humor. Once you reach the age of 18 I hope you've actually put down the laptop and read a fucking book or your white-mutt parents are gonna have to participate in some serious leftism, in the form of housing a worthless incel parasite for the rest of time.

>t. Retard whos only left leaning because of moralfagging
You got me. I can't stand thinking about a world where I don't care if people die just for being poor or brown.
>a lack of fundamental economic knowledge and understanding
Yeah I have a lack of understanding alright. I don't understand why a small group of people should own any business without doing any work. I don't understand why just owning something means you should be rich when others have not. I don't understand why people vote for ridiculous strongmen like it's a popularity contest in high school. I don't understand why people put all their hopes and dreams into people who only know the life of inheritance, who've never labored in the heat, who have never taken shit from a belligerent consumer, who've never witnessed the reality of the food they eat.
I don't understand why people blame the Jews and not the system the merchant class created to secure their own power.

Attached: 54364354.jpg (225x225, 7K)

Jesus Christ, we need a way to round up all of the helicopterrideposters and put them in front of a firing squad

>wow im free to choose where i work and can be paid more if i can do work with high demand or skill level!
You're "free" to work or starve. Even then, the value you create is stolen from you by capitalists and called "profit"
>well the government tells me where i have to work and because of "to each according to their needs" i only get the bare minimum, but atleast im not a slave to the machine
Under a communist mode of production, there is no state, so hot that down.
>i am free to make money in any way. No state to take my money, no state to tell me where to work or to give my money to others. I am as free as the economy and can make money in whatever wayni desire to as long as it doesnt violate the NAP. No one can keep me down
Please tell me who's going to enforce the NAP without a government.
>See the folly of your ways, join glorious ancapistan, or perish at the hands of the ghost of a brazillian helicopter enthusiast
If you love Ancapistan so much, why don't you move to Sierra Leone?

Attached: 1560193649564.jpg (567x443, 189K)

1 fuck communism
2 FUCK COMMUNISM

Get shot loser. ;)

Spoken like a free man, comrade. Be a puppet for the king, the sharks will definitely give you that high-paying job eventually

A menace to society, everyone's waiting for you to snap at Walgreens and shoot some off-duty security guard who asks you to calm down.

>people die just for being poor or brown
Yeah see you're a fucking caveman for somehow equating racism with ancap. Can they work? Cool, skin color doesnt matter then, as long as they can contribute there's no way they'd die. Also since theres like, not a state, corrupt cops cant throw weed bags in black peoples cars just to arrest them.
And poor people? People arent just magically poor. There are lots of jobs that are only illegal because of the state. A poor person could easily make a living selling drugs when there's no police force to say "hey you cant smoke a plant that makes you happy, come pay us $800!"
>a small group of people
Yeah but that group isnt inherently locked. Bill gates worked out of his garage, did that stop him from becoming rich as fuck? Nope. Not everyone can be a CEO, but every individual has the chance of becoming one.
>why do people blame the jews
Well if you're a leftie youd get a kick out of this. The richest people in the world are ALL jewish. The top like 15 spots are. They're all the same family too! 1 family holds all the true richest people in the world. Why arent they counted? Because they're "european royalty". Doesnt that seem sketchy? It does to me. This jewish family holds a large amount of global wealth and does nothing with it, leading to inflation. Bill gates does alot with his money, it circulates, he doesnt cause inflation. The jewish family does. Thats my one gripe with rich people is them not spending money, it needs to circulate.
>secure their own power
Whos they? Like i said gates did work in a garage, i doubt he was part of this secret society, so how did he become so rich?

>Bill gates worked out of his garage, did that stop him from becoming rich as fuck?
Because everyone has a garage to work out of.
>The richest people in the world are ALL jewish.
pic related
>Whos they? Like i said gates did work in a garage, i doubt he was part of this secret society, so how did he become so rich?
By being a wealthy white guy who was raised around computers that people who had less never had access to.

Attached: 1537597297677.jpg (734x452, 156K)

Don't worry, I'm here.
Authoritarian and centrist.

Rather get paid for my work instead of just living to work slavic faggot LARP shill

Government-subsidised industries are a nice thing for jobs. The free market just exports work abroad.

Attached: 1567014913045.png (543x591, 19K)

what's 9th grade like?

Good man, all others are missing the point of their own existence

Was that enough buzzwords for you, Joe?