/pcbg/ - Personal Computer Building General

>8400 makes less sense than the 1600 because the price/thread is much higher
Shit I missed that out. I thought the 8400 and 1600 had the same thread count. Thanks.

>If the industry becomes more multicore-friendly
AMDrones has been saying this over a decade. Nobody waste their talent utilizing 12 threads for your manchildren's toys.

Intel sure seems to care a lot

>AMDrones has been saying this over a decade.
lol that's why intel hasn't jumped onto the more cores.
More cores also make it btter for game developers. The market's also needed and wanted it but Intel was to much of a Jew to step up so AMD to initiative

Gonna buy this. Any reason not to?

Attached: Screenshot_2018-03-28-09-39-31.png (1440x2560, 591K)

Well, lately Intel has been advocating the same, that the industry should shift focus onto multithreaded performance rather than the previous standard of high load on a few threads.
This is of course due to their 10 nm process unfortunately going to shit, so now they have to resort to the AMD-way of doing things by adding more cores.

the backplate was such a bitch to get in, the shit just refuses to clamp down nicely, I even set the 4 sides to 1151 setting and it still wouldnt go in right

Koa is cute! CUTE!!!

Who makes non-shitty mobos? Have had two ASRocks fail, so don't suggest them.

Everybody has dud boards and generally if you spend more you get more