Apple hates them

why tho

It's actually going to be 1180.

>Why is everybody hating on nvidia yet they are successful?
They have a good product.

Seriously. AMD always seems to be in a constant state of getting it's shit together. They haven't had a relevant high end GPU since the R9 290. Vega 64 cards have problems against the 1080.

>spent a long time
Literally one generation

I wonder how the people at AMD feel about the fact that even if they did manage to release a gpu superior to nvidias, it will still sell much less.

>envidia
>means envy
>envy is the act of hating on someone who is more successful than you
???

Nvidia fucked ms in the ass with the first Xbox by selling their gpu to them at obscene prices despite scaling it to a better and cheaper process I think

Same for Sony and the rsx in the ps3. Sony needed a gpu asap because they scratched the double cell ps3 concept at last minute

I think they are doing the same with Nintendo on the switch, since it costs 300 euros while it being a stupid Chinese tablet worth at max 100 in the real world

are you mad? nintendo have publicly stated that their partnership with nvidia was one of the key successes to their product and they were the answer to the failings of the wii u. the wii u was a bitch to develop for and had very little documentation. the nvidia tegra chip they're using is easy for devs to work with and nvidias extremely mature libraries is what is allowing all these 3rd party devs like bethesda with skyrim and rockstar with la noire to port their games onto the switch with ease.
nvidia was the key to the switch's success.
also sony approached nvidia for the xbox one but nvidia said they felt it wasn't profitable enough for them.

extremetech.com/gaming/150892-nvidia-gave-amd-ps4-because-console-margins-are-terrible

there have been linkedin posts from last year which also link a next gen MS product (could be next gen console, laptop, tablet etc) to nvidia.

sony approached nvidia for the ps4*
all consoles same shit anyway