>heavily server-side-scripted iframes and CSS3 transitions/transformations
Who is going to pay for it? This is what all these cucks on Jow Forums don't understand. These companies are using javascript on their websites because they don't want to spend more money than they have to on server resources. Do you really want to go back to slow loading websites and rate limiting? Remember those "The website is really busy right now!" messages in the early 2000's ?
You are retard.
Unless the point is a fun challenge or to get it to work in a text based browser, there is no point.
not that user, but
>website with no JS at all
>server application written in languages other than JS
where is the JS, you tard
Or to have a site that isn't web 2.0 garbage that will not work if not modified every month because somewhere, something changed. I had to make a responsive website using pure HTML and CSS when I was in college, JavaScript was literally forbidden.
You can refresh with a tag
>because something somwhere changed
What? Why would your own code break if you didn't change it?
>JavaScript was literally forbidden.
Good for you.
> make everything look smooth and modern?
Why, it would be cooler if it looked like an old web 1.0 site. Plus it would keep out normies. Just use a cgi script.
html5 for graphics but i don't know how you're going to make asynchronous requests to the server without having something pretty much like javascr*pt
I honestly don't see the point. But more power to you I guess.