/re/ - Reverse Engineering

Tutorials:
>The Legend of R4ndom
>legend.octopuslabs.io/sample-page.html

libre ebooks:
>PC Assembly language
>pacman128.github.io/pcasm/

>Reverse Engineering for Beginners
>beginners.re

CTFs and Recruitment Challenges:
>Flare-On
>flare-on.com
>Binaries & Solutions
>fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2017/10/2017-flare-on-challenge-solutions.html

>ESET Recruitment Challenge
>join.eset.com/en/challenges/malware-analyst

Hardware Reverse Engineering:
>(add a libre book, if you know one)

CrackMes:
>CrackMes.one
>crackmes.one

>HackThisSite
>hackthissite.org

Attached: 710248834_orig.jpg (450x353, 52K)

Other urls found in this thread:

csa.checkpoint.com/index.php?p=game
reddit.com/r/netsec/wiki/start
opensecuritytraining.info/Training.html
amazon.com/Practical-Malware-Analysis-Hands-Dissecting-ebook/dp/B007ED2XDS
amazon.com/Practical-Reverse-Engineering-Reversing-Obfuscation-ebook/dp/B00IA22R2Y/ref=pd_sim_351_4?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=HRFXSH9AXPNNGMFFFRT5
amazon.com/Learning-Binary-Analysis-elfmaster-ONeill/dp/1782167102
godbolt.org/
0x00sec.org/
transfer.sh/ja5mb/idapro7.7z
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Please add anything related tutorial, ebook or high quality CTF/recruitment to expand this small list.

>recruitment
well, Check Point is having all kind of challenges right now
csa.checkpoint.com/index.php?p=game
but you need to register first...

I'm sad to say this, but hackerman threads don't even last a few days until they 404, why do you think this one will be successful?

reddit.com/r/netsec/wiki/start
opensecuritytraining.info/Training.html

also ##re @ freenode

root-me.org has rev-eng challenges (among others).

>nothing on lena151
>nothing on Goppit intro on asm

bumperino

Thanks for adding!

I will add it next thread.

But it doesn't harm to create such thread.
Maybe someone finds this helpful or gets inspirated to learn reverse engineering.

It doesn't need to be successful. It should just survive for some hours to get read.

>But it doesn't harm to create such thread.
it doesn't, but, see, we reached page 10 twice already...

btw, what I wanted to say (but didn't) is that this should be part of a /security/ general.
of course the /cyb/ + /sec/ sucks, though, so not that one... some other dedicated general.

also, bump again