>he thinks the BBC writing in pidgin English for blacks is equivalent to even basic English literature
Stay mad. Ideologue.
>he thinks the BBC writing in pidgin English for blacks is equivalent to even basic English literature
Stay mad. Ideologue.
C is holding CPU performance back with its forced sequential single thread mode of computing. We could get a lot more out of present day CPU technology, if it didn't need to play nice with software written in C.
um user, you can make another thread you know
It's a pretty expensive operation. Modern CPUs try to squeeze out some extra performance with speculative execution. In speculative execution the CPU is a marathon runner and C code is the retard in a trolley that the CPU has to push around to get anywhere, slowing everything down. The CPU wants to work in parallel as much as it can, whereas C has a single track mind by design.
And when you increase threads and cores, you just have multiple marathon runners pushing their own personal retard cart around. In a better model the CPU and code would both be running side-by-side.
CPUs (specific cores) are single threaded and run in isolation, and C tries to reflect how the underlying hardware likes to run.
TempleOS has 87k lines of code and is better then SJWfox
>B) C can't do faster and with less unnecessary syntax
compile time evaluation with constexpr :)
C is better than C++ but most of you niggers compile your C with the bloated glibc, and compile it with gcc, which at this point is done in C++
C is only good with musl; in terms of compilers, tcc looks promising but I'm not sure when it can fully compete with gcc
OP is right. Fuck everything else.