What is 5G and why do people love it?

What is 5G and why do people love it?

Attached: dbfdaaf1b538e9c2c39265c5e794a1ab.jpg (640x960, 70K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8316581/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

bigger number = better

I'd like to triangulate her position at 5g speeds if you know what I mean

It's like 4g but faster.

Gigabit wireless with

5G fucking when!???

Can finally play pubg mobile lagfree

Attached: 1516896625924.jpg (387x437, 40K)

5G will allow cellphone providers to sell home internet packages that are competitive with existing wired ISPs. Add in Ol' Musky's Starlink services, and we will be seeing a lot more competition & choices for internet service in 5 years or so.

Attached: Starlink-test-satellites-SpaceX.jpg (2543x1526, 391K)

Apparently they utilise the interference that has plagued the generations before to instead send data. Making "interference" more of a positive than a negative.

Fixed wireless to your house.
Important for rural Americans who have been stuck with satellite or slow dsl.

Attached: tfwnogf.jpg (800x800, 40K)

still with 1gb cap for americans

its going to be shit tho because they will still fuck it up with carrier nat. only wired connections give a real ip that can be reached from another device.

main keyword is virtualization. you take a base station and move whatever you can out of it to "the cloud". this should make base stations cheaper and the software easier to deploy and update. if everything goes right, you'll be able to add thousands of new small base stations. less traffic per base station == better bandwidth for single user. now you just have to have fast handover protocol and maybe even interwork with wifi and you're set for mobile users. then you just have to handle all the "IoT" shit, industrial automation, vehicle-to-x, etc.

5G has the potential to replace wired connections, to the point where wireless carriers and traditional ISPs would be directly competing with each other.

Google Fiber has also shown a lot of interest as ISPs cant use their semitic lawyers to cockblock expansion of their business

What do you feel holds you back from having a hot gf like that pic user

The end game

many things. the only reason why i have not killed myself yet is because i want to see how badly everything will get fucked up in the future.

Attached: 1462826307259.jpg (900x675, 229K)

It just has a broader range of frequency, reducing interference. That is literally all.

Attached: 1524920439534.png (1000x750, 1.18M)

>faster
Oh, oh my classic Jow Forums brainlet. He doesn't know the most basic things about electromagnetic waves. Ha, Ha! His vocabulary is poor, and influenced by marketing. Hooooo haha ha.

wrong

Oh, oh my classic Jow Forums brainlet. He doesn't know the most basic things about electromagnetic waves. Ha, Ha! His vocabulary is poor, and influenced by marketing. Hooooo haha ha.

WIll it be available any any country any time soon ?

It gives you brain cancer faster

Oh, oh my classic Jow Forums brainlet. He doesn't know the most basic things about electromagnetic waves. Ha, Ha! His vocabulary is poor, and influenced by marketing. Hooooo haha ha.

Verizon is rolling it in Los Angeles next month.

5G can triangulate your position faster than standard methods thats why the big push. too lazy to find reference but its to do with the fact that they will be using two directional dishes

Telecom engineer here. I'm a PhD student working on antennas arrays specifically for 5G.

First of all the current frequency spectrum cannot handle the amount of users even with all the techniques deployed so far for channel separation and compression.

So there will be a leap in frequencies, going over 6GHz. Currently the talks are about 24.25-29.5 GHz band for the whole world. Each country is setting different bands because there's still no real ITU-T specifications.

Overall latency, speeds and user capacity will be improved. It's a much needed jump, similar to what we saw from the 1G analog signal to 2G.

>her

next-gen botnet

stay away if you know what's good for you...

>24.25-29.5 GHz
so a piece of paper can block the signal.

Oh, oh my classic Jow Forums brainlet. He doesn't know the most basic things about electromagnetic waves. Ha, Ha! His vocabulary is poor, and influenced by marketing. Hooooo haha ha.

Whoops better tell those 10,000 engineers how stupid they are for not engineering a way.

XDD

fuck, i hope not

Explain

>they will be using two directional dishes
Please explain, brainlet here.

Attached: 1520874822218.jpg (256x192, 12K)

As an engineer, are you at all concerned with such high frequencies blanketing us everywhere? Do you think that your biologist friends would say there is some sort of risk to human health?

It doesn't, the plans are for cells so small that the loss will actually be beneficial since you won't have interference from adjacent cells.
Buildings will be have their own cells and sub-6 GHz frequencies will be used in certain cases. Those are the ones currently being used for LTE + a few different ones.
Pathing and reflections will be taken into account by your device and cells so it's optimized.
Overall, don't worry about the quality of your signal.

Considering that the power that's around us is so low, I doubt that it will have a big effect, since attenuation will be much higher on this new band.
Admittedly, I'm no biologist, so my opinion is centered on how waves work. Which I mean that the higher frequency and low power would just affect the very surface of your skin and not penetrate enough and that the power is so low that it wouldn't do anything to your cells.
But like I said, I'm not a biologist and studies are needed in this subject for the new bands.

Pic related, my antenna. bandwidth is currently crap. I need to optimize the design more and maybe review it.

ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8316581/ - that's the latest paper about the trends for 5G. Recommend some reading.

Attached: lmao.png (1184x754, 125K)

so incredibly brainwashed by tranny porn you can't tell the difference huh

>antenna
all I see is parasitic inductance

Antennas are weird things. Believe it or not, this design works and I'm using a FR4 substrate to try to make it as low cost as possible.
But I don't think I will achieve the bandwidth I want with it.