Why would you want a "modern" dumbed-down UWP only Windows? Such a thing existed, it was called Windows RT and it was a disaster.
Also, UWP applications take ages to start, even on a high-end PC. Also lots of transitions, loading screens, etc. Extremely slow and heavy compared to Win32.
Introduce UWP
Benjamin Johnson
Nathaniel Rodriguez
Is it worth learning the presentation foundation over windows forms?
Thomas Brown
WPF >>> WF
But both will be replaced in the future
Honestly, your best bet would be to learn ASP and just create webapps
William Stewart
win32 IS windows, uwp will NEVER replace it. and anyone wanting the replacement (both developers and users) will be able to change faster to a linux environment than to uwp (in most cases all it takes is another compilation targeting linux, for uwp you need to change everything due to the SEVERE LIMITATIONS in this damage control microshaft shit)
mark my words, or screencap this shit, UWP WILL NEVER TAKE BE A ANYTHING OF VALUE. you have been warned
Chase Parker
If you know WF just stick with it, no point in switching.
Hunter Ortiz
Shoulda stopped at "supposed" my dude. You should know by now that MS ALWAYS overpromises and fails to deliver. Look at every other distribution of Windows since the dawn of time.
Why can't they create a sandbox for Win32 programs?
Grayson Smith
Yeah, where is my Ubuntu compatibility pack for Arch? Oh wait, nobody needs that...
Easton Evans
you clearly have no jdea what a distribution is
lurk more faggot
Nolan Powell
>windows supports legacy programs
>this is a bad thing
freetards everybody
Isaiah Ramirez
>Extremely slow and heavy compared to Win32.
Objectively untrue.
>HALF A GB of RAM
Also untrue, 200mb at most.
Literally sounds like you guys haven't even used windows 10 at all but are desperate to shit on it. Strange.