wow, such facts, many arguments. >snapdragon 636 is both faster and more power efficient only thing about 636 in the wild is some memebench score... you know the benchmark that ties smartphone cpus with laptop cpus 3-4 times the TDP. I'll take an OoO superscalar anyday over some in order crap.
>you claimed G4 was 300 EUR in 2014, which is a lie No I didn't, I copied the price from gsmarena and specifically said that my 2015, not 2014, phone which I bought for $280 has those features
>What a genius strategy from LG that's not strategy, it's your strategy, you avoid phones with artificially inflated prices. The price determines if you buy brands or features. it's well known that samsung and apple phones keep their value, because poor people buy them second hand en-masse in order to upgrade their social status. I don't buy thottphones.
See, that's what I'm talking about. Very aggresive LG marketing.
Nathaniel Price
>only thing about 636 in the wild is some memebench score okay, so on what basis are you saying that SD808 in G4 is faster? Your made up internet credibility points?
Robert Brooks
I still love my v10. It did boot loop though. After warranty repair it's still going strong. Bought it first week out and on my third battery. It's android 6 on Verizon.
John Cox
Kek, but I'm a moosefag and ours work perfectly fine.
Samuel Jackson
>SD808 in G4 is faster? it's right there in my post, OoO super-scalar.
Aiden Johnson
>snapdragon 636 is both faster and more power efficient >meanwhile the graphics are like 3 times slower
Levi Lee
i understand what it is. How is what you're saying relevant to what we're discussing? How is it in ANY way relevant to real life performance of a phone? Why are you performing world-class mental gymnastics to prove a SoC from 2014 performs better than one from 2018, despite every possible metric available simply proving you wrong?
