I guess you talk about WinFS. It isn't a filesystem but a file store and metadata database working on top the filesystem. To put in another perspective, it functioned similar to BeOS fs but on userland so contrast to what Gates says it wasn't an innovative feature. Some features I think have been incorporated in MS SQL Server. NTFS future is ReFS introduced in 8.1 and is built similar to ZFS/Btrfs. It lacks yet some NTFS features and is nowhere near ZFS' reliability.
OFFICIAL LIST OF ALL TIME MISTAKES
James Scott
Lucas Cox
>Files are spaced out on the disk to have maximum space between each other, rather than keeping them all in one place together
This is exactly how ext4 works in order to prevent fragmentation. The issue is when parts of a file are all around the disk, which can happen if you put files one next to other and then for example you try to increase size of one. That's how NTFS works and why it needs defragmentation.
Alexander Phillips
Niggers
Asher Rogers
Behold the most balanced digits
Joshua Price
What file system is best for long term storage?
Blake Allen
Literally the other way around. Files are all written together and when they increase in size parts of them need to be written in another part of the disk, where there is free space, thus becoming split into fragments, or some might even say... fragmented.
Fucking brainlet.
Cooper Mitchell
Oracle buying Sun
Nathaniel Rogers
fucking checked you awful nigger
Jayden Gray
ZFS is hands down the best choice.
Landon Carter
NTFS is not as terrible as windows' inability to handle many aspects of what NTFS supports (case sensitivity for example)