AMAZON BTFO

If you don't think companies wouldn't just let them starve if there were no social services then you don't understand America.

What WOULD likely happen is poor people would start murdering the rich once they are starving.

none. and it's not going to happen anyways because laws like that are illegal and have been struck down numerous times. and how do you think his base is going to react when they can't get government benefits because they're addicted to opiates?

they won't. costs shift to consumers and people who may be welfare candidates will likely be discriminated out. it's a lose-lose. It's also funny how this bill only impacts low margin, highly competitive businesses too. lmao. but whatever.

Those are way too inaccurate to be used as any sort of legal judgement.

You'd have to do something like what the military does, where every sample is fed into an quick assay machine which can trigger false positives, and then every positive sample is sent to a lab for GC/MS testing.
This costs at least $100 per test, not to mention the personnel required to run the program.

>The executives do a very difficult job, that very few people can do.
Kek
>capitalist monopolies work under market's rules
>people's worth is based on how much their labour can be exploited by the capitalist
Just kys, corporate cuck

>Your position only comes jealousy and envy.
lol look everyone I'm projecting.jpg
>The executives do a very difficult job, that very few people can do.
The hard work of being born into a wealthy family, going to college for free, and getting a high position in daddy's company right after graduation.

>Employment is abiding under the Supply and Demand rule.
>Why is working at McDonalds so badly paid?
>Because anyone can do it.
>Why is being a top executive so well paid?
>Because very, very, very, very few people can do it.
I get that but there's no reason for the gap to be so wide. What purpose does it serve for 90% of the wealth to be with 10% of the people? Large corporations actively lobby the government to keep minimum wage low and keep welfare in place so they don't have to pay a living wage.

ya ok. because you have great insight at high level management, where every single thing you do can make or break a company. Not even a capitalist shilling cuck but i'm not dumb enough to think being CEO is somehow easy mode.

another quality technology thread

Attached: idiot.png (499x338, 38K)

Actually that is a very healthy initiative. I am extremely surprised it comes from the left.

Too bad gubmint handouts even exist, but since they do its a good practice to stop the companies from sucking taxpayer's money.

>This costs at least $100 per test, not to mention the personnel required to run the program.
We can't properly fund public schools but we have plenty of money for this!