Arch is not so hard

Because partitioning without a GUI is dumb, ESPECIALLY when doing so on a drive that already has data on it for another OS.

That's why. Nobody wants to fuck with that. There's really no good reason that Arch doesn't have a complete GUI install like Manjaro does anyway. It's just raw elitism.

>a drive that already has data on it for another OS
so do it in that OS udindu

pacman -Sy

kek

This. Switching to Plan 9 is like that magical moment when you finally accept all aspects of your love-hate relationship with computers. You realize no matter how you see it, every software sucks, so you might as well use the lightest functional OS, and you've just found it. Then you go to IRC and dedicate the rest of your week to post some flaming rants on the cat -v channel. Also, accepting that love-hate relationship with computers will make you finally do something productive (that's why Plan 9 doesn't have a JunkScript-compatible browser btw, for all you underage morons).

Anyway, Arch is total shit. The most poser-tier, pathetic, retarded distro.

It's hard to install if you're afraid of the command line, which, let's face it, most people are. For some reason they've concluded, despite using text literally every day, that a textual interface is too difficult for them to use.

>New package upgrade breaks something
>echo "IgnorePkg = $pkgname" >> /etc/pacman.conf
>Wait 1-3 days.
>Comment out lines.
>sudo pacman -Syyu
>Profit.

Attached: screenshot.jpg (1366x768, 104K)

>Using a distro where a broken update takes days to get fixed
>Using a distro where a broken update can happen
I shiggy diggy

The irony of manjaro being a no good thieving nigger

>Gentoo is much easier than Arch in the long term
how so?