Its more energy efficient at 1.35volts for laptops and for ddr4, these early versions aren't much of an improvement. DDR3 is found at 2400mhz and higher sometimes.
Why do we need DDR5 ram
we'd rather put the spoon up your ass since you act so ignorant and edgy. Problem is you would like it so just fuck off.
So you're admitting that you're wrong, but you're afraid of what people would think of you if you responded back like a normal human being?
You can just as easily show us how it is a downgrade.
>hIgher latencies
>similar densities
>frequencies that ddr3 were in fact capable of
It would have been different if they were awing us with 256gb sized dims, but they waven't user. Instead they just forced everyone to upgrade for no reason at all. At current densities, latencies, and frequencies ddr4 just doesn't fucking make any sense.
see
Your turn user.
Compare DDR3 to DDR5 then, that's like... 2x the upgrade man...
wait, if ddr4 is meme, and ddr5 is an even bigger meme, than were is dose the upgrade happen?
>> "but user, they're more power efficient!"
I don't want more power efficiency, I want more power at higher frequencies!
>more power efficient
>cost of this efficiency is more than the money you save from the efficiency
owo
>My DDR3 RAM cost me 50$ for 8GB of 1333
>right now a 16GB DDR4 RAM at 3200 costs me 240$
But think of the efficiency, think of the money I save on electricity bills :O