Are they the underdog now?
Are they the underdog now?
Other urls found in this thread:
nextplatform.com
twitter.com
Being the underdog implies they have some potential.
>Being the underdog implies they have some potential.
You're telling me that today's intel has less potential than AMD during the bulldozer years?
Intel married itself to a dead-end instruction set architecture. AMD is a more diversified company that can survive the creeping irrelevance of x86.
He's an AMD shill, of course he's going to say that after a decade of being shit.
No it didn't. Intel, unlike AMD, already has experienced with other architectures than x86.
So intel is the underdog now?
>Intel, unlike AMD, already has experienced with other architectures than x86.
It sold XScale to Marvell over a decade ago. That was the last time it did anything other than x86.
>NAND
>FPGA
>Optane
>network
>AI
okay, AMD is a good guy
I look forward to the day when Intel is recognized primarily as a NAND and FPGA company.
they make wifi chips too. of course they sucked, but they found their way into the iphone, and they also had shitty wifi chips in 2000s, thanks to them everyone got to connect to unsecured linksys.
They also make NAND chips and I'm sure they make other shit too.