you can't get viruses on linux
You can't get viruses on linux
Other urls found in this thread:
yes you can, if your package's mirrors get compromised; ergo if sys admins of the distro arw fucktards like on Linux Mint
>things that never happened
Also, you can't get STDs if you wear condoms
epic pepe, but Linux is a worthless OS. Just use Windoze like everyone else on planet earf
Linux is a kernel
>it’s open source so its safe
>creates open source virus because linuxnoobs don’t read source before installing packages
>not reading all 450million+ lines of code of OS release and its combined packages
You're not considered a linux user if you don't actually do this.
why can't you gtards get it right. Its GNU + Linux or is it GNU/Linux!?
>have windoze box
>have debian box
>provider calls: I'm supposedly spaming email all over the place
>turns out the debian box catched something
Now what you fucks.
just make sure your windoze box doesn't download the executables being spammed out by your debian box and you'll be fine
I run about 100+ packages on the AUR with malware in it lol archrad skids don't even know how to read pkgbuilds lmao
When I first got my raspberry pi I enabled SSH to the public without even changing the username/password. Then i noticed my bash history was cleared. Then I noticed /var/log had a bunch of empty files.
There are more linux malware than windows, ever heard of Mirai?
exploit-db.com
>Linux
>2,839 total entries
>Windows
>9,227 total entries
Sure, noobs don't read the source themselves. But do you know who does? Repository maintainers.
Most packages are installed from a repository where all the packages have been checked. Check mate, faggot.
so if I'm to trust third-party repo maintainers, why wouldn't I just stay with Windows or Mac and have a machine that just works? Windows and Mac more way more trustworthy than some distributed package managing goons, plus I get free support
now compare the number of users of each os
Arch and Mint are the only distros that this has happened too. Don't use autistic distros and you're fine.
you do. your argument is stupid
Those were just propogation methods though. Did you even look up the amount of Linux malware vs windows? There is no advantage of windows malware besides ransomware now a days, and threat actors have noticed that. This isn't 2006
Please tell me you're not suggesting we compare OSes using a malware to user ratio
Given how compatible wine is getting, i bet you will be able to run even Windows 95 viruses on it.
I'd trust redhat a lot more than ms or apple. that's why i run fedora on all my computers
You can't get professional grade software either.
Are you retarded? Linux is Open Source, that's why people find vulnerabilities, windows it isn't.
Most of those are router firmware exploits though
got it, thanks, user.
And most of the Linux ones are server oriented.