ALL OTHERS WHO SAY OTHERWISE ARE CONTRARIAN BASTARDS! It's more mainstream than displayport, has a higher audio quality than TOSLINK/optical out and is way cheaper than firewire, thunderbolt and USB-C.
Stop shilling other industry standards!! We only need one and that's HDMI!!!!!!
>Friendly reminder DVI-D was the only worthwhile competitor at the time
Other urls found in this thread:
amazon.com
twitter.com
Displayport actually technically is better and also looks better. If you've never used all of these you would probably shill for HDMI but DP actually looks better the colors are sharper and have true coloration vs. the odd tinting of HDMI.
this this and this
OP is a retarded NPC consumer
DisplayPort is literally better and pushes higher resolutions you dolt, as well as higher refresh rates and better colour profiles.
yeah but fucking make the 8k@240hz standard already, don't keep fucking changing versions. incompetent fucking retarded hdmi. and it's not even an open standard
>HDMI® Specification 2.1 is the most recent update of the HDMI specification and supports a range of higher video resolutions and refresh rates including 8K60 and 4K120, and resolutions up to 10K. Dynamic HDR formats are also supported, and bandwidth capability is increased up to 48Gbps.
imagine being this fucking retarded that they keep leapfrogging short steps like this
DisplayPort is better and cheaper in every way.
with HDMI companies litterally have to pay shekels to the jewish company that owns the interface. its not a good interface and people should stop using it.
>audio on a display cable
what the fuck just use a seperate cable for audio, why is this a problem?
just curious, how does it compare to DVI-D?
>cant do more than 60hz
yeah sure lmao
DVI is ok, it's not as shit as people make it out. It really depends on your video adapter at the end of the day and the quality of everything.
But DP is king.