Where does your GPU currently shit?

Where does your GPU currently shit?

Attached: Hitman2.jpg (2560x1440, 462K)

>over 66fps low
I wonder how it really runs though. Hardware Unboxed are pretty retarded when it comes to benchmarks.

In the streets

1070 so still sitting pretty. Once my GPU starts hitting the half way mark on these charts is when I plan an upgrade.

>105 fps
Feels pretty good.

In the loo.

Not even on there.
tfw Radeon r7 250

damn the 970 is still holding strong.
and my current 1070 is doing really good, basically matching a vega 56

Fury x here. I don't know if I should be happy or not.

>Intel Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express

Get on my level.

my RX 580 is a mid-range card and indeed that's how it scores
I got what I paid for

why would I use a GPU for?

Nitro+ 580 here, probably higher than what's listed for 580 8GB considering they don't list mine and it's clocked higher than stock

Same.

In the top, of course.

Are titan v and quadro cards not on the list? Surely someone benched them

>21
Fuggg

970 still easy 60fps with 3.5bg vram. based gpu

IT'S NOT FAIR BROS

Attached: 1542461983683.png (653x726, 42K)

mid field slowly going to the bottom field, how long until it wont appear in the graph?

>Got a 1070 at launch to replace my 280x
Amazing to see how great of a card it is all these years later. Probably won't upgrade for a really long time.

I own a 290x that clocks to well over the average so i'd say around where the 1060 6gb and fury nano sit. Not bad for a card thats 5 years old.

>mfw my RX 460 4GB isn't even on the chart.

Attached: 1542462407457.gif (250x195, 801K)

970 with OC still rocking any 1080p game

>39 fps
Ugghh could do with an upgrade I suppose

980ti here, I think it'll be another 2 or 3 years (hopefully) before I have to upgrade

It's interesting to witness the largest GPU sales in history mixed with the lowest GPU progression in history too

and shittiest gaming development in history too

Nobody seriously benches quadros for vidya.

I have a 1080 Ti, a Vega 64 and two RX 580s, so two of the top five and midway.

>1050ti and 1080p monitor
Crank that down to high and you got ez 60 fps

I want to know the power draw of that liquid cooled vega 64. That is a massive improvement.

just assume is a little slower than a 560

Given how much more marketing companies are doing (some more than others) its not surprising pointless upgrades are being pushed as the next big thing.

Remember: the more you buy the more you save.

where's gtx 660

These. Not that I really give a shit about gaming performance. It's nice to know my purchases have some life left in them.

Where's Intel Atom Processor D4xx/D5xx/N4xx/N5xx Integrated Graphics Controller?

Owner of 390 here.

Might be looking for a decent vega sale on black friday, otherwise I'm just gonna wait and see what amd next gen has to offer.

its a dx11 game
its not exactly groundbreaking. As a matter of fact its quite shit in optimization and graphical options

Outside of the list.

Attached: welcome to 2009.jpg (674x532, 74K)

I'm playing Hitman 1 with 1060 6gb and I get dips under 60 on high, wierd.

44 FPS.

I literally have no problems with my GTX 1070 @ 1440p for almost 2 years. Absolute patrician choice. I'm sure novidya will have to gimp this with drivers, then I will switch to Vega or whatever equivalent at that time (navi maybe)

My 3 way SLI (3xgtx 780ti) killed almost 5 PSU's in 5 years.

89/109

>Quad
Fucking zoomers

Attached: whatyearis.jpg (671x527, 46K)

8th and barely slower than a 1080ti and 2080ti wtf
1080 g1
Pretty impressive for a 2.5 year old gpu
Would have been great if pascal made its way onto 7nm but sadly every single high end nvidia card from now on is gonna have rt x turing bloat lopsided arch
Had a 56 but it's performance was spotty and didn't have 21:9 dsr support so I sold it on
Intel stagnated desktop gaming tier CPU tech for over a decade as well so its not like decent gpus would have had much headroom to play with considering 4c/4t was standard for 12 fucking years thanks to them
Not to mention historically low uptake of apis on pc like vulkan and dx12 despite consoles and phones making heavy use of them..
Funny how rtx on is actually a downgrade isn't jt
Went from 290 to 390x to a 1080 then v56 and back to the 1080
Vega 56 is fucking fast and basically the new pascal midrange 2016 tier card it's the new 970/7970

Dont bother sidegrading like I did obviously
CPU?

I think you should get yourself a videocard capable of true color graphics like a S3 Trio.

>CPU?
R1600 3.8Ghz

70 FPS. I guess I can play this video game just fine.

I have a 1080ti and a ryzen 2700x, 16 GB of ram
I get fps dips constantly on hitman2 it's playable but the shouldn't be happening at all, (i play at 1440p all max settings)

I have a 32mb TNT Riva in my Pentium 4 s478 build.

Quake II runnin good.

Downgrade to 399 drivers? Idk I only have hitman 1 2016 atm
2700x here as well sounds like the game still has issues plus that shit options menu and no dx12 is a deal breaker for me atm.
Loaded up hm1 markets in dx12 and got 80-100fps+ at 2k
Sucks how the sequel is less optimised on pc for some fucking reason

>TFW GTX 970 @ 1440p
Navi please save us

Attached: 1457388442503.jpg (506x291, 21K)

Noice.

>3.5gb vram @ 1440p
Absolute madman not even my 1080 can do it in every game 60fps+ maxxed

Richfag I only had a tnt2 16mb turbo riva

I should consider upgrading from my 970, shouldn't I?

RX 480 ain't even on that chart

Mine isn't on the list.
It's Intel HD Graphics 620 (Lenovo) which I think is pretty good. I would expect it to play that game somewhere in the middle of the list I bet.

yes goy, 60fps is completely unacceptable in a fully maxed out game, go get that RTX 2080™

If you can get a 64 or 1080ti cheap go for it.
Performance has plateaued for the next 2 years anyway amd has nothing for mainstream until navi which is polaris tier shit
Arcturus will be good but that's ages away
Stay the fuck away from turing it's a nightmare even besides the price and rtx

>60fps is completely unacceptable
Correct

>then v56 and back to the 1080
Why back to the 1080? Or why 1080 to v56?

I want an upgrade for my rx 580, but I'm not sure I care about Freesync or any such tech (I don't notice any difference except in test programs) and might consider nvidia as well

I was bored and my 1080 shat the bed waited for rma
Only got rid of it cause the stock cooler sucked
Card itself was great

>Where does your GPU currently shit?

On your moms face.

It's an OCd rx480 so prolly between the 580 and 590. I play anything on 4k-30 or 2k-60 if it helps anything.

Funny how the 16mb has the empty spaces for the extra memory chips in the 32mb.

>ITT:Poorfags
Callin all my MX4000 64MB bros.

It's only getting 4fps more than the air-cooled card, and that'll be down to higher frequencies due to less thermal throttling.

I have a 1080 Ti, its still on top of the benchmarks. Most games I currently play run on my RX 480 I have in the other PC in 4K.

God I hated seeing that as a kid.
Run games well into 2003 on that thing with a p3 450mhz 256mb Windows xp
Mafia 1 and unreal 2 where unplayable then I got a crazy add 9600 128mb and xp 2700+ pc first game I loaded up was underground 1 pure orgasmic bliss that game aged like wine
Lool I had a 7900gt till 2008 get on my level
Had a 390x when those came out God I was so disappointed couldn't believe the 1080 launched the same year what the fuck where amd thinking not releasing big polaris?

I had one of those.
That 32bit bus was quite terrible, but the memory overclocked a LOT.
I could make it almost get into MX440 levels by literally doubling the memory clockspeed.

Low end gtx 1060 6gb. Scores pretty good on that hardware unboxed chart, and bought it for $150 a couple years ago.
Not bad imo.

It is okay for now as most of the games i play are older and not particularly demanding but with newer things it is starting to be a struggle.

80% of the time im playing TF2 with a GFX config, OSU!, or UT so it isn't to terrible for now...

Attached: 1461894534738.jpg (525x257, 65K)

Tf2
Haven't loaded that up in yonks
I heard those 970s oc past 980s is that true?

>OSU!
how do you even play that shit for more than 5 minutes? its one of the most boring games to play.

>Haven't loaded that up in yonks
The competitive scene is good (the real one not that in game BS Valve added that everyone hates) but pubs have degraded over the years. To many zoomers playing games these days.

>I heard those 970s oc past 980s is that true?
As long as you don't hit the Vram limit it can trade blows with a reference 980 but the 980 will OC far past the 970.
guess you just don't like rhythm games?

Attached: e81b83dcb8412211b33e7b39bb3b98d73b4a9b14_full.jpg (184x184, 11K)

I don't see my 650 on that chart.
But this chart is worthless anyway, videogames are for children. If you want to play games go buy a console.

Attached: whattimedoyouwakeup5am6am7ami4234423.png (500x374, 53K)

Not listed.
>own an HD 7950

>(You)

Attached: 1494291063905.jpg (1800x1578, 212K)

it's at the top but i'm also waiting for it to combust

What's not fair? Vega 64 beating 1080ti?
You are wearing the wrong hat.

>videogames are for children
keep saying that. Maybe someday it will be true.

>tfw the only game I play at 1440p is stalker
Feels good.

PCIe 1

120 frames is cool.

Attached: 20181106_153810.jpg (5312x2988, 3.63M)

In the 'so shit it doesn't even appear there' step.

so, uh, where does a r9 280x sit?

Sitting pretty in vega city

Generally where the 380/380x does. It can drop lower as tonga (the chips inside the 380) has some improvements that tahiti lacks.

>9600 128mb
This, I also went from riva tnt2 to 9600 and not being able to count polygons anymore was basically the only "next gen" feeling I ever had in my life.

>my current 1070 is doing really good, basically matching a vega 56

Attached: 1542237822469.jpg (232x230, 6K)

middle of the pack 69/79fps Best $125 ever spent

Attached: fdgdfg.gif (404x523, 26K)

4th from the top

1050ti, not a terrible card to be honest.

I don't play at 1080p anyways, 1680x1050.

Is 1080p worth the upgrade?

Based

>fell for the ultra quality meme
>doesn't realize game looks better with minimal settings

VEGA 56 on 64 firmware. Tweaked and undervolted to perfection.

Can you substantiate that? Or are you just such an Intelvidia shill you hate anyone that shows favorable results for AMD?