>128 Zen 2 cores (two EBYN Rome 64c in a 2S) score 12800 in Cinebench, at just 1.8GHz of unoptimized engineering samples
>Inturd needs to OC on industrial chiller to 2.5GHz for their shitty 96 cores (two 48c Zionist turds in a 2S, which is, BTW FYI, max a Zionist turd can do, while Zen 2 easily does 4S and even more) to score measly 12500
INTURDED
Fucking DEMOLISHED.
A dirty kike gassed by day, makes the world go "hooray!". Press H to "hooray!".
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
anyforums.com
twitter.com
R
>genuine inrel
what did they mean by this?
Incorrect reporting of device ID.
Cinebench is a fucked mess, while AIDA works as intended, so AIDA reports fine while Cinebench has glitches.
R
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Cinnebench is borked as fuck on high core counts.
Yeah, they're gonna release an (((update))) that fixes Intel's lower score issue though.
That doesn't matter, since EBYN rips Jewish ass even by sheer brute force alone, unpotimized and underclocked. The sandbagging has never been as clear and evident as it is right now.
It's borked as fuck as some cores don't even get to run due to the way cinnebench schedules, a third of the cores could have been waiting their turn on both Intel and AMD any there's no way to know.
>you can have a lion and a terminator or a little chinese girl
really puts things in perspective
>It's borked as fuck as some cores don't even get to run due to the way cinnebench schedules
...you DO understand this makes Zen 2 even BETTER if that is actually so?
I was not arguing pro AMD or Intel, just that the benchmark is flaky as fuck.
On top of that it is really easy to fake, remember the "2800X" leaks we had some months ago? Made up CB scores.
Anti-semitist hate speech. Sad!
Yeah, I've seen a few reviewers hit this issue with the first gen epyc. They have to run the bench multiple times in a row to get some of the cores to start working.
>blames 1st generation EPYC core activation issues on software
The absolute STATE of AMD fan-people.
>new socket for Cascade Fail, security patches not applied
>same socket ROME as EBYN, ES @1.8Niggahurtz
being on Inturd must hurt right now
Same thing happens with Xeon Platinums so yeah...
Can only imagine the power draw of 2x cascade lake ap. Must be damn near 1 kW
Apparently they cannot even get server OEMs to build cascade lake ap boards, so they are doing an inhouse design and trying to get OEMs to sell that. Several OEMs have said no, Dell and HPE i think.
HHHAHAHAHHA
You do realize that jew own both amd and intel right?
>Cascade Fail
youtube.com
AMD was founded by a Jew, but he was a bretty kool guy. And no, NOWADAYS it's run by a chink HOLY MOTHER OF ALL THAT IS.
Cinebench needs a much bigger and more complex test render I think, or the ability to run multiple renders of the same test at the same time, with each sub render capped to a maximum of 16 threads.
Would give a more accurate result I would think.
>Can only imagine the power draw of 2x cascade lake
We're looking at bare minimum 300W power consumption, possibly 350W, and that's just one socket without other components. And it still can't beat AMD's 180W EPYC engineering sample running at 1.8GHz, literally BACK TO BABYLON.
Epyc 1 64 cores makes 6100 points is this? At 2.2GHz?
It's still bizarre to see AMD delivering.
>Epyc 1 64 cores
You mean 2S? Because gen1 Epyc is 32 cores max.
Pretty sure he meant 2S, that's the only way to achieve 64c with Zen1.
AMD already said Zen 2 can do 2.8GHz on all 64 cores, so I guess that would result in 2S 14000+ score in Cinebench after the thing goes gold. Considering that with 12800 it already finishes full test in ~5 seconds, 14000~14500 would essentially saturate Cinebench as it'll complete in 1~2 seconds. Can't fucking wait for Inshit's ass to be ripped to bloody shreds.
you mean a furry or a cosplayer
>AMD already said Zen 2 can do 2.8GHz on all 64 cores
didnt hear that, where do you read/hear that?
It was shown to be running with 2.35GHz on all cores with mere air alone, and that was unpolished unpotimized engineering sample. Under water it could easily do 2.5 and above. Maybe 3GHz, even.
again: WHERE? gimme your sauce m8. AMD showed Zen2 vs Inturds during new horizon without telling us the clocks. only the HAWK supercomputer or whatever showed 2.35Ghz on a slide, that's the only thing I saw. but never read about 2.8Ghz and need a sauce on your claim.
>HAWK supercomputer or whatever showed 2.35Ghz on a slide
There was also a video.
wtf I attribute intel bullshit to jews now
why cant they put real cores there instead of the threads?
Moderators, delete this antisemitic thread from 4channel!