what's an acceptable quality for thumbnails?
Thumbnails
depends on source material's level of detail
Source can be detailed, but I think details would defeat the purpose of thumbnails in general.
Original image
>kon-kit
based
Users never need thumbnails
i see you are a man of finer taste as well
What site is that?
a web app i made a few years ago. running off a server on my local network
Are you running this off of a rpi or a real machine?
Raspberries are real machines
1280x720
real server. originally meant as a basic NAS.
never heard of RPI til now.
Lemme get the sauce
full quality
this
/thread
Please I must have the sauce.
?
there, same page with lossless webp
How the fuck am I supposed to type that shit in
You can write kanji (and sometimes kana) freehand on sites like jisho.org , kanji.sljfaq.org and google translate. Jisho.org, japandict.com and many more for searching by radicals.
Fuck off back to pedoweebs.
i use to do that with 4chanx. would always kill my internet until all the images loaded. idk what I was thinking back then
Comparing the two, I found out what I needed.
Just enough quality to be able to easily discern shapes to get an accurate idea of what's going on in the pic. Sticking with a level 30 for webp quality on thumbs
>what's an acceptable quality for thumbnails?
good quality 700x700
>Not being able to read and type moon
Up to 64x64 lossy.
Those are dimensions...
Im talking about quality
>talking about quality
Whatever quality is when an image gets scaled up to 64x64. Open KolourPaint, scale an image to 64 on it's largest dimension, save it as a png, use pngquant -s1 to compress it.
Manga thumbnails should limit the color palette to a few shades of gray, not have JPEG artifacts. Use 4-8 bit color PNG.
Thanks for an meaningful reply. Can't you OCR the screenshot, though?
>type moon
Yessssssssssss
Noice.
Also, acceptable quality should be based on the bandwidth available