What the f*ck is with this coaxial sh*t?

I've come across some yellow RCA video cables.

> Nothing unusual except they're a bit thicker than than others.
> Notice the writing on the PVC says RG-59/U Coaxial Cable
> It's clearly labeled "video" on the yellow plug
> Begin to wonder if this can carry sound like f-type coaxial
> Upon research I find it impossible to get answer to "where is negative connection"
> have to use multimeter to verify that outer cap is ground
> Notice that PVC writing on F-Type cable also says RG-59/U Coaxial Cable despite it being very different from RCA cable with the same labeling.

Why do they give the exact same name to two very different cables with two different purposes?

Attached: CAS515.jpg (500x500, 31K)

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.com/Coaxial-Adapter-Female-RCA-Male/dp/B000AAL4PA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Are you fucking stupid? RG-59 is the type of cable, not the type of plug or the purpose. I could terminate CAT6 with RCA connectors and it would still be CAT6. Same as I could send S/PDIF over RG-59 if I fucking wanted to.
> Upon research I find it impossible to get answer to "where is negative connection"
Because you're the only person on Earth retarded enough to look at a coax connector and think: "Yeah, it'd be a good idea to use the center conductor as ground and the shield as the signal carrier"

Just for the record, you are useless.

Attached: trivia.png (524x357, 217K)

Hi, I found a coaxial cable with RCA written on the plug. It's screwed up.

not that user, you're a retard

amazon.com/Coaxial-Adapter-Female-RCA-Male/dp/B000AAL4PA

apparently people would use it as a heavy duty cable.
the coaxial cable shielding works great for long runs (as far as i can tell)

Your complaint is very valid indeed. Anyone who doesn't see the problems with this labeling inconsistency is most definitely mentally deficient.

OP is correct. You are a sad case of stupid.

FPBP

Don't fricking swear I'll report you