AMD circle-jerking on Jow Forums needs to stop

Shills in full force tonight posting benchmarks, we get it, your beloved Ryzen CPUs only looks good on paper but guess what, even shit sticks to paper and that's what you are fanboys

Attached: download.jpg (474x287, 22K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/kC3ny3LBfi4?t=6763
techpowerup.com/249956/14nm-6th-time-over-intel-readies-10-core-comet-lake-die-to-preempt-zen-2-am4
techpowerup.com/249952/amd-doubles-l3-cache-per-ccx-with-zen-2-rome
youtube.com/watch?v=nB857zSEdoM
youtube.com/watch?v=BSBI11sgsA4
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Incels are seething.

REMENBER

Attached: CANT NO COMPETE.png (714x748, 313K)

False flag.

M8, this is the calm before the storm. We're literally a few months away from intel getting BTFO so hard they'll be 2-3 generations behind AMD. Core latency was already proven to be massively improved by just using better RAM, god knows what they did in zen 2.

Attached: 1543178739655.png (1824x1026, 431K)

Just from 2133 to 3200 you get a massive 30% lower latency alone.

Attached: ccxlatency2.png (602x523, 173K)

>stop post the bad on intel do the needful and buy intel

Attached: 1495358050273.png (1070x601, 495K)

>intcel cope the post

When Jow Forums doesn't know what they are talking about, but really want to sell amd.

see

Yes I know. It's actually a cpu design flaw that is mitigated by fast ram. The faster the ram, and the less obvious the flaw.

on the other hand my overclocked 1700 chews through shader compiles and lightmass builds a hell of a lot faster than the 7700k ever would

the fact that you take the opportunity to shit on Ryzen CPUs gives away that you're not an impartial Jow Forums poster tired of shills, but a shill yourself
kys

Op is an obvious amd shill though.

NEVER FORGET BROS WE WON

youtu.be/kC3ny3LBfi4?t=6763

Su taking shots without remorse.

>64 cores, 128 threads
>dual socket doubles that
>256 threads per motherboard
I loved that part. I don't need it myself but I can imagine servers would want that. That's like multiple servers in one.

Was drawing attention more to the lines
>HE SHOWED YOU WHY CHIPLETS WERE SO SO IMPORTANT IN THE FIRST GENERATION
>SOME CALLED IT GLUING CHIPS TOGETHER, WE CALLED IT THE NEXT GENERATION OF SYSTEM DESIGN.
Here we are in the future. Intel opened glue factories.

Intel is using the same technique now?

Cascade Lake

More like casket lake.

Attached: Two UPI LinksAT.png (976x349, 72K)

HELLO SINCE THIS IS NOW 4CHANNEL WE SHOULD BAN ALL INTEL BASHING BECAUSE ITS JUST ANTISEMITISM

Attached: 1539936990440.jpg (691x771, 64K)

Attached: Optionsfield.png (114x87, 1K)

Attached: Urmomsvagina.png (113x94, 2K)

THE TEN TERAFLOP BARRIER TO ENTHUSIAST GAMING
WE CRUSHED THE COMPETITION

You need to go back

Attached: 1538027720106.jpg (600x592, 206K)

shalom

times up jewtel

Attached: 359.5.jpg (780x750, 118K)

Attached: 5143.png (1909x161, 35K)

>design flaw
>not a deliberate design choice made in agreement with RAM manufacturers to boost sales of mid to high performance memory kits
Try again

DESU with 256 CPU threads, you could have a, say, 250-300W TDP with CPUs alone and go back to the age of Software Rendering, ditching GPUs completely

>AMD SUX GUISE JUST KEEP BUYING 14nm+++++++ FOREVA!!
techpowerup.com/249956/14nm-6th-time-over-intel-readies-10-core-comet-lake-die-to-preempt-zen-2-am4

ahahahahahahahahahaha

seething reaches critical values, just like intel power consumption

Attached: 1516579026334.png (583x157, 16K)

>Comet Lake
>Another SkyLake refresh
>number of expected security issues fixed: 0

Just buy it goy!

Attached: 1528987497987.jpg (960x878, 125K)

Wouldn't this be expected anyway if you increase memory clock by 50%?

AMD jew is now stronger than Intel jew just put your shekels in a different pocket goy.

less shekels for better hardware or more shekels for more security flaws hmmm

Attached: 1477404358873.png (899x899, 784K)

Attached: 984984984984984.jpg (600x570, 16K)

Intel is garbage.

So 2666Mhz is when the point of diminishing returns start then?

>Comet Lake
The memes write themselves.

Attached: intel-comet-lake.jpg (600x442, 82K)

No, it's 2933 because it's the fastest memory zen+ officially supports

2666Mhz RAM kits are quite more cheaper than most 2999Mhz ones, and the jump in performance is not that big, compared to 2400Mhz vs 2666Mhz RAM.

It's not like it's AMDs fault that Intel's 14nm process was actually named after the number of refreshes it would have and not feature size

No. Ryzen is best thing sinze Phenom II. Fucking n00b. Eat shit.

>AMD Doubles L3 Cache Per CCX with Zen 2 "Rome"
techpowerup.com/249952/amd-doubles-l3-cache-per-ccx-with-zen-2-rome

>14nm 6th Time Over: Intel Readies 10-core "Comet Lake" Die to Preempt "Zen 2" AM4
techpowerup.com/249956/14nm-6th-time-over-intel-readies-10-core-comet-lake-die-to-preempt-zen-2-am4

Attached: olf3aU5.png (1050x700, 319K)

Assmad incel fanboys

Attached: WHIRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.gif (700x362, 146K)

What the fuck, that's 26% improvement and I have 2133 RAM. Would I see any real-world difference with that improvement? Give example.

Posting in seething Intel thread.
Shit bait but have a pity (You) OP, AMD is BBC king now, Intel is the little white boy.

Attached: 1523004659278.png (271x288, 68K)

>better or equal performance for less money and not as bad of security risks
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP

yes you would.
youtube.com/watch?v=nB857zSEdoM
also watch digital foundry's analysis on the issue

t. intel employee

just oc. 2666 ram usually runs at 1.2V.
3200 1.35V.

my 2666 hyperx runs 2866 cl16-18-18 at 1.2.
2933 at 1.22V.
i haven't tested 3200. so can't say.

Can I OC cheap 2133 RAM? I have never messed wíth RAM.

Intel just needs to stop with trying to squeeze blood out of 14nm process and wait until EMIB and 10nm process is actually fixed. If they want to seriously compete against Zen2 and Zen3.

"Comet Lake" is going to be a bigger disappointment then Coffee Lake S refresh. 10-cores with dual-channel DDR4 is going to severely memory-bandwidth starved at near full to full load. If they stick with ring-bus it is going to have noticeable scaling issues when fully loaded barring thermal ones. Going with mesh will solve the scaling issues but at the cost of sacrificing low-threaded performance.

>rationalising his disappointment at spending 100% more money on 10% more performance
I feel sorry for you, kid. Maybe you'll learn from this mistake and make peace with yourself, instead of subjecting us to your endless shitty cope threads.

Arguably both companies are capable of being massive jews, thats why we need competition. The market will get a lot more healthy if we have a... lets face it we will never get a 50/50 Intel/AMD split, but a 60/40 or 70/30 could happen.

yes, but you might not get to 3200.
so don't go on expecting that.

>but our lying about 30% BETTER SINGLE CORE (no matter how many times actual benchmarks prove you're lying) is perfectly fine
This is why we rape your assholes raw and bleeding every time you post your cope threads: it's not because we're AMDrones, it's because you're a worthless piece of shit that deserves 24/7 anal pack rape for the rest of your pointless life.

There's like five threads up RIGHT NOW about how amd sucks. I'd call a mental hospital. The amount of brainwashing you're under should be illegal.

youtube.com/watch?v=BSBI11sgsA4

Follow her example.

Attached: 1539107572471.png (698x396, 34K)