Does Jow Forums use a shit browser?

Check your history, dumbass

It slowly loaded a grey box. It finished. I could zoom. It was very boring.

Dumb question: What is supposed to happen and why?

YOUR GREY BOX OF GAYNESS DOES NOT AMUSE ROLF

RESUME YOUR BURGER FLIPPING OAFISH DULLARD

Apparently not on the qa board.

I think it's a kind of benchmark.

Werks fine

>How does your browser react?
RAM usage goes up by 1GB, that's all.
am i supposed to see something? Firefox Quantum ESR here.

Attached: 45.png (271x293, 122K)

epic

Attached: Screenshot (651).png (747x314, 15K)

Attached: benis.png (834x740, 59K)

Takes a while to load.
Nothing else happens.
I went looking for the post though, and hovered over the real image.
Jow Forums x loaded it and my ram got used up
probably some shitty js rendering thing
browser is just fine

So this is the power of JPG?

Attached: fuck_jpg.png (10000x10000, 212K)

Loads grey box, fitted to the height of the window, RAM usage increases by 300Mb. Guess Waterfox ins't that bad.

950MB ram used
Chromium

slowly loaded the image, no high cpu usage probs bc im on firefox and linux

it just opens it

>android Firefox
Slowly loads the image.
>PC Firefox
Loads the image

The image is actually less than 300kb. It only increases in size when you load it.

>684 B
wut

works fine in basic bitch chrome whats your point

Attached: Untitled.png (776x31, 4K)

>posts a picture which is 300mb+
>says something about the browser ever being at fault for slow performance
The bottleneck is literally the network. With 100mb/s it would still take 3 sec to load.

WHAT THE FUCK

The image is less than 1kb, idiot.

nope

Having a giggle, m8?

Are you?

Attached: file.png (362x176, 5K)

Attached: 1526169770948.png (413x76, 6K)

Is this brown box?

what's that?

Sorry, ain't loading >300mb of noise, upload the original somewhere maybe I'll check it out.

>these retards are looking at i.4cdn.org/qa/1542500604348s.jpg

Then you deserve it fgt.

>He fell for the chrome book meme

OP specifically warned about using shit browsers.

Attached: 1515589417752.png (1280x1122, 189K)

>shit browser
see What are you trying to say?

>see
Jow Forums reports wrong size. Easily testable by curl. Not browser related.

this seems like a weird way to ddos hiroshimoot
uploading that image it was 600 bytes but my network usage was maxed out downloading it

anyone have the original 600 bytes? best i can get it down to is 13mb from the 300mb download

Attached: 1484567580101.png (500x480, 23K)

Did somebody post a 0day on Jow Forums? What is going on here?

its just a cheeky compression thing with jpeg
for some reason when your browser loads the image it becomes 300 mb when in fact the original is only 600bytes

It's 300mb server-side. Jow Forums tried compressing it and fucked up.

definately a ddos opportunity
rip hiroshima

What happens if someone uploads an entire thread of them?
Does Jow Forums have scalable storage? If not someone might be able to crash the site that way.
lol

even if it can handle the storage aspects, loads of people loading that huge image constantly is sure to cause some problems too

>150 threads
>image limit = 150
>150*150*300MB=6.75 terabytes
>*72 boards
>486 terabytes
some boards have a higher image limit
close enough
a spammer could realistically do this
lole

The storage wouldn't be the bottleneck, the network IO would be. And the resulting bandwidth consumed on the CDN would cost $$$$$$

delete this

ok, this is epic

Attached: 1538317651030.png (739x20, 4K)

>Chrome
>Loads 10000x10000 Gray Box
That is it.

clover.

Attached: Screenshot_20181127-005558.png (720x1280, 50K)

Retard

first time I've seen 4chin servers hit 200Mbps

Chrome, private session, macOS.
Nothing.
I downloaded the image directly, it's 300MB before the browser even touches it
Are they testing Jow Forums compressing images?
I thought about auto-converting GIF's to webm ages back, but one of the hardest things about running an imageboard is thumbnail generation, let alone compressing every fucking image

Jow Forums's ran out of space a couple times, I think hiro just purged random groups of images till there was enough space for the site to keep running.

Baka!

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-11-27 at 11.10.27 am.png (567x145, 30K)

Bottom of the front page, dummy.

Basically sweet fuck all. Increased my memory consumption from 800MB to what you see in the screenshot.

>barely 1tb
weak

I'm an idiot, that was an old screenshot.

Attached: hurdrurr.png (1366x768, 128K)

How do you even manage to get anything done on that thing? I've been looking at the first picture for two minutes and I still don't know what the fuck I'm looking at.

What are you having a problem with, exactly?
Left side is my taskbar, I roll like that in Windows and OSX whenever I rarely have to use either of those operating systems, too.

On the right is gkrellm so I have a readout on stuff I like to keep track of, including gkrellflynn, who is fucking awesome for indicating CPU usage in a funny way while the bar graphs are more granular.

In the center is my desktop/workspace, currently covered, maximized, by Chromium then I have Yakuake running on top of that because I have it configured to open or close whenever I hit tilde, like opening the console in a game.

Okay, so that answers my question: you don't get anything done.

Jow Forums uses cloudflare
cloudflare doesn't charge for bandwidth

>be using based firefox
>click
>takes a second, literally a second and only a second
>loads in all its glory
>didnt kill itself or my pc
Chromeplebs BTFO

Oh, I thought you were posting one of the neat PNGs. Instead of just a big PNG. Lame.

Suuuure I don't. This shit is super-productive for me. I'm just not doing shit right now except using this to browse the web while I'm setting up unRAID on my desktop so I can run Windows 10 Enterprise and Manjaro in tandem.

Whenever I use a computer, I spend the majority of my time on the right side of the screen(cursor), my attention on the right and center of the screen and my tasks on the left. It's the easiest way for workflow to work for me. Congrats on being an elitist douchenozzle, though. A+ post, as usual.

gb2 /reddit/. Might I suggest Jow Forumsiamverysmart or Jow Forumsincels?

Attached: desktop with yakuake and neofetch'd.png (1366x768, 1.07M)

Jow Forums losslessly reencodes jpegs for whatever retarded reason, probably metadata removal
it's so fucking annoying to see your carefully crafted jpegs reposted with bloated up filesize

ugliest shit i've ever seen, never post this again retard

Hey buddy, I think your shift key is broken.
Why all the hate?

Do you need to get laid or something?

slowly loaded it

Using Vivaldi (Chrome based)
It takes time to load but displays fine anyways

move you're head around while looking at OP's thumbnail it's freakin sick, looks like 3D

Also did I do something wrong? Nothing really happened once the image finished downloading it I just saw it normally

Attached: Screenshot (33).png (4480x1440, 1.16M)

The only thing you did wrong was have an updated browser.
Chrome, Firefox and even Edge has no issues with even this fuckhuge of a jpeg (Firefox was the fastest at rendering the image as it downloaded, Vanilla Chrome only rendered it after it was done but ran smoothly)
I can only guess the people that have issues are ones with old browser versions.

But that jpg started out as a less than 1kb jpg.

dumb dumb, the image is uploaded at 603b, then the Jow Forums servers manipulate it to make thumbnails and shit but for whatever reason, it blows up to 300Mb server side, band width has nothing to do with it, it about hogging internal server I/O by uploading a ton of these tiny images and letting the server bloat shit it self "compressing" them

Running Basilisk
>Already have ~50 tabs open
>Open Image.
>Loads after about 10 sec
>Browser still functions normally while it loads.

So does that mean this would work?

Attached: large.jpg (10000x10000, 1.49M)

Guess there's something more to it, then.

I have no idea what I'm doing.

Attached: noisy.jpg (5017x5083, 2.07M)

holy hell pham, you need to check out a desktop thread and get a couple better ideas.
Funny though, seeing some rando get ripped on for his desktop.

Attached: 755712286f07cce33b2067408bccaa18ac27fd21dc3a3b3827b64eb4e0a86055.jpg (800x600, 159K)

Microsoft Edge handled it just fine. Lots of moire, but not sure if that's supposed to happen.

Slowdown for about 20 seconds then it was fine.

Firefox 63 / Win10 /Thinkpad T450 (i5-4300U 8GB RAM)

>i.4cdn.org/qa/1542500604348.jpg
Took a while to load, increased Edge memory usage by 148MB.

idk maybe it was using a gzipped http request that was tampered with to inflate the same segment many times?

Loads pretty slowly but it seems like the bottleneck was network, not processing power.
Fresh Waterfox install

Attached: 1509378414899.gif (500x500, 1.2M)

Attached: every fucking browser works.png (3760x1396, 401K)

How did you manage to upload such a huge file to Jow Forums? Doesn't Jow Forums have size restrictions? Are you a mod trolling innocent neckbeards?

based

>expand the image
>suddenly my monitor lets out a loud ass hiss
yikes

Thanks for wasting my mobile data.

Fennec F-Droid

Attached: Screenshot_2018-11-27-09-13-36.png (720x1229, 56K)

>"Image cannot be displayed because it contains errors."
Joke's on you, my RAM usage remained about the same as before.

>purged random groups of images till there was enough space
Not purging /b/, what a waste.