Why are there no 32" 144Hz QHD IPS monitors? There are plenty of 27" ones, and I don't want to have to put it closer to my face than my current 24" 1080p monitor.
32" monitors
Chase Smith
Jaxson Harris
Whoa I have 480p have monitor there is oldfags like me
Adrian Gutierrez
I'm trying to decide if I should get a 32" VA monitor or a 27" IPS, or just wait for them to make 32" IPS monitors.
120+Hz is a must. I can't go back to having a 60Hz panel.
Elijah Scott
AU optics makes the panels, and the oems just make their model based of their panel. Thus why there is so many 27" qhd 144z monitors. They're essentially the same monitor with some slight variance.
Carson Baker
I don't know if this is helpful but here it is anyway. I have a 144hz VA monitor and the contrast is beautiful compared to an IPS. It looks more dynamic. But the motion blur is annoying in games because it works against you being able to see clearly when turning even though the frame rate is high. The blur really does not look bad at all but again it matters in games a bit if you're trying to aim and turn.
Henry Sanders
But that varies from panel to panel, right? I can't imagine anyone wanting to use VA at all if they all look like this
youtube.com
Brandon Morris
Currently considering these:
newegg.com
amazon.com
Which should I go with, Jow Forumsentlemen?
Isaac Howard
Is there any chance they'll start making 32" IPS panels in the next couple years?
Jason Ortiz
Yeah mine doesn't do that. I only notice the blur if I'm in a game playing at high frame rates and I somewhat quickly turn. It makes a noticeable motion blur effect instead of smooth panning. That's really the only compromise over IPS in my experience. There's nothing really obviously bad like TN's rainbow effect when at an angle.
Parker Clark
There has to be a market for it that the oems want to buy to resell, and 4k seems to be the standard for 32" monitors right now. 32" 1440p is unpopular because it's a lower dpi than 24" 1080p which is the standard. No one wants to upgrade to a blurrier monitor.
Xavier Richardson
omnicalculator.com
I get 91 PPI for both 1080p @ 24" and 1440p @ 32".
1440p @ 27" is 108ppi.
Samuel Gray
>32" @ 1440p
> Display size: 27.89" × 15.69" = 437.55in2 (70.84cm × 39.85cm = 2822.93cm2) at 91.79 PPI, 0.2767mm dot pitch, 8425 PPI2
>24" @ 1080p
>Display size: 20.92" × 11.77" = 246.12in2 (53.13cm × 29.89cm = 1587.9cm2) at 91.79 PPI, 0.2767mm dot pitch, 8425 PPI2
Nope, looks like you're wrong there, they are the same DPI. And there is a big market for 32" IPS @ 60Hz so im pretty sure they would end up moving a lot of 32" IPS @ 120Hz+.
Alexander Murphy
Welp, I went ahead and took the dive. I ordered the Samsung C32HG70. This will be my first VA panel (even if it's QLED). Here's hoping it performs well.
Oliver Hill
Not many people are buying high refresh rate IPS panels because they've been prohibitively expensive for years and cucked by nvidia charging more for gsync.
I've been on the market for the Asus PG279Q for 4 years and it just hasn't dropped in price. I won't buy the Acer XB271HU because of the sexual predator branding, what were they fucking thinking?
Charles Williams
Those are actually pretty good I can vouch
Henry Bailey
>sexual predator branding
Adrian Allen
>Browse lolicon at 144hz
>Monitor casing reminds you that you're a degenerate
Thanks Acer
Jaxson Martinez
24" is QHD territory
I couldn't imagine 24"@FHD, counting pixels
Kayden Taylor
why buy bigger monitors when you can buy smaller and sit closer?
Ayden Price
I have a big desk and having the monitor at the front means I can't put anything in that huge space behind it. I can't write on anything because there's no room to do that with the monitor at the front.
Camden Cruz
Total pleb view. Most UI scales poorly and ~91 DPI has been the "default" for a long time. The next jump up that avoids your cancerous noninteger scaling is 4K @ 24" which is ~182ppi.
Levi James
I use my monitor as my TV, so 32" is the perfect balance between not too big for a monitor and not too small for a TV.