What's the most redpilled build environment?
Is it make + gcc + vim + git?
What's the most redpilled build environment?
Is it make + gcc + vim + git?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.cppreference.com
twitter.com
sorry but vim is for retard pajeets
use evil mode
You spelled Atom + Cargo + git wrong.
Its actually:
VS Code without dark mode.
I thought i saw this trap on okcupid.
Add a muxer, like screen or tmux. Also learn git hooks.
t. a tween
> Implying Pajeets could use text-only interfaces.
They can barely read.
She's verifiably a chick
Its not a trap, its a girl (female).
Eclipse is objectively superior to all meme editors
>verifiably
nudes?
Sorry, I prefer women I can actually touch so I wouldn't know.
See:
and pic related
using dark mode indicates your suppressed desire of BBC
she/he does have a man face
Gross
>not having photographic memory of each file
it's like you aren't even trying
That's why I said without dark mode.
>Is it make + gcc + vim + git?
Yes.
I have nothing against IDEs but I hate when I must touch mouse (and sometimes you have to, not everything is accessible through keyboard).
Mouse and programming doesn't go together.
Do people still unironically use gcc over clang?
I always have. What the fuck is even clang. It's what a friend of mine always called a made-up deity that governs the success of Space Engineer projects.
Yes.
Sounds like the sound I make when I hit my gf over the head with my frying pan
Does clang allow nested functions yet? It didn't last time I tried it
XDD what
Yes if you replace make+gcc with ninja+clang
make + msvc + vs + git
YOU have a man face
cargo is cool but rust is literally fascist and can't reason about simple data structures, so forget that
my answer is vim + waf + git
with clang of course btw
>msvc + vs
Explain this, do you mean the IDE or vsc with the compiler?
>waf
Why
make/premake
scite/code::blocks/codelite
gcc/clang
git
iktf
>gcc
BLOATED BUGGY SHIT
because my literal faggot supervisor introduced it to me one day and I thought it was kinda neat
in all honesty I was joking (not about the supervisor though). waf is nowhere near as good as make
wew had me worried
Like this for example
void someFunc() {
const int stackSize = 100;
int stack[stackSize];
int stackI = 0;
void push( int value ) {
stack[stackI] = value;
stackI++;
}
int pop() {
if (stackI == 0) { return INT_MIN; }
stackI--;
return stack[stackI];
}
// Code which uses push() and pop() a lot goes here
}
I know we're on Jow Forums but ffs, user. I didn't mean what a nested fxn is; I meant what as in disbelief that clang doesn't allow them. It won't compile C with nested functions?
Did they not think of those in the fucking 1970s? Jesus.
Switch to Rust; the future is now.
stop writing non standard code and it'll work
absolute state of c++
thats gonna be a yikes from me dawg
Swap vim with emacs and we good
someone redpill me on the vim vs. emacs question
keep in mind I've been using vim
>punk
God, why do young people not understand what real punk and goth style is. Fucking memegoths. Almost as bad as gay people making being gay their character trait.
the IDE
just trying to match the format
Why would you use make alongside an IDE
Isn't that shit built in
Visual studio 2017
so she wasn't a guy? what a turn off
Plot twist: it's a tranny
I GUESS THEY NEVER MISS, HUH?
>I hate how everyone call me a guy/trap
if she wasn't a goblina with a manface maybe people won't think of her as a trap.
>Doesn't like being called a guy/trap
What's wrong with guys/traps? Sexist much?
wasted
make+gcc+vim+git+gdb+go-tools
Enjoy your bloatware.
Get a keyboard with a trackpoint. It's nice having a not bad version of the mouse.
>pajeet
>vim
XOR it, faggot
Because he IS a guy/trap. Girls don't get mad if you say that to them, but traps will.
>pushes, pops and the stack in c-cuck-cuck
What did he mean by this?
This is the reason the standard disallows nested functions. Neck yourself.
cringe
>t. brainlet
By that logic does it mean I can call you a big gay homo and you won't get mad bro?
>have to use qsort with a one-off comparison function
>not only I can't use a lambda in place, I have to define the fucking function in file scope
The absolute state of C brainlets
> Unlike function declaration, function definitions are allowed at file scope only (there are no nested functions).
en.cppreference.com
Looks like a gnu extension. C++ allows it in the standard though.
$ gcc -c -o nested.o -std=c11 --pedantic nested.c
nested.c: In function ‘someFunc’:
nested.c:8:5: warning: ISO C forbids nested functions [-Wpedantic]
void push( int value ) {
^~~~
nested.c:12:5: warning: ISO C forbids nested functions [-Wpedantic]
int pop() {
^~~
Favourite punk album user?
Pajeet here. I exclusively use Vim with ctags, Valgrind, GDB, and GCC. Needfully what now, sir?
checc
Colorforth
>Mouse and programming doesn't go together.
*blocks your path*
It's C though
What is the reason I don't understand pls
not using lambdas
void someFunc() {
const int stackSize = 100;
int stack[stackSize];
int stackI = 0;
auto push = [&stack, &stackI]( int value ) {
stack[stackI] = value;
stackI++;
};
auto pop = [&stack, &stackI]() -> int {
if (stackI == 0) { return INT_MIN; }
stackI--;
return stack[stackI];
};
// Code which uses push() and pop() a lot goes here
}
gulp + node + atom + github
Bare metal forth.
Hex editor and a table of opcodes.
>> Implying Pajeets could use text-only interfaces.
>implying
I think you're looking for the term closures, which C doesn't allow, Rust does though :')
what font is that?
Based pajeet
>snake_case C
Excellent choice, the only true way to develop in C
Roboto Mono
golang
fossil (static binary build)
any editor