1080p TV

1024x768, checkmate

>The main drawback for me is laptops and phones with 1440p+ resolutions don't provide a ton of benefit but take away precious battery life

Thank you for admitting what /spg/ will not. They think we live in the future and have some sort of advanced solid-state battery technology to power all this shit (or they just live their lives next to an outlet). If anything I would prefer phones with smaller screens and 720p resolution. A modern version of my old Xperia Z3 Compact would be great.

>not to mention that laptops aren't suited to doing anything remotely intensive with graphics at resolutions above 1080p

I find that aside from sharpness, there is not much benefit and it can actually make things more complicated than they need to be. For a long time I didn't even think I needed to go above 1080p on my desktop monitor. But my 27" QHD monitor changed my mind on that. There is a benefit, you can fit more stuff on the screen, but you need a larger screen to really take advantage of it.

I was once like this, minus the 1080p smartphone (I had a 240p Blackberry Curve 9300). Dark times man, being a poor student sucked.

>1080p TV I use for watching LaserDiscs, at least the built-in scaler is good
>1920x1200 desktop I use for watching 4:3 and 16:9 content
>1024x768 laptop I use for managing shitboxes on-location
>960x540 phone I use to watch 1080p porn

Attached: 1540658818111.jpg (600x518, 35K)

I got the QHD screen on my work T480s mostly because it's way brighter than the 1080p screen, but scaling is a pain in the ass, some apps don't like to work at 175%. I had a 1080p T450 before and it was mostly fine at 125%, 100% was small as fuck but manageable.

Same, super comfy.
>Phoneposting on a technology board.

I have a 1080p W520 at home and I find that it's the perfect screen size / resolution combo. I can use it at 100% scaling with no issues, programs all work, it's great. For a while I had a 15" Latitude at work but the screen resolution was 1366x768. It was shit. I would much rather have my wife's Surface Pro 4, sure the resolution can be annoying at times, but it's way easier to live with a high resolution on a small screen than a low resolution on a large screen.

Have my upvote.

Based and redpilled

1080p simple as

Attached: 1536000546235.jpg (620x411, 103K)

>1080p TV from 14
>1080p desktop from 2012
>1080p laptop from 2014
>1080p smartphone from 2013
I'm a late adopter but feels nice as fuck. Just gave gf a motog6, she finally caught up to my old af note 3.

>4K Phone
>4K TV
>4K Monitor
>4K Watch

Attached: file.png (680x497, 611K)

Based weon.

>4k tv
>1080p desktop
>1080p laptop
>1440p (I think? dunno issa v20) phone

Meanwhile I'm using a MacBook Pro with 2880x1800 IPS.
If I want to buy a monitor with these specs, it's >$1000.
Why hasn't retina resolution spread beyond Apple products?

What's so great about 1080? Why not go higher?

>only 232 pixels more than 1024x768
I don't get the appeal.

Meanwhile you're a subhuman troglodyte that thinks low res retina trash is good.