Is openBSD good?
Is openBSD good?
no
no
no
yes!
imagine having a brain THIS small
CIA niggers, please go
yes
yes, but it is still worse than linux
Linux is a kernel.
i think what you mean is GNU/Linux, or, as I have recently started calling it, GNU plus Linux
No TRIM.
Good for a router / firewall maybe, but as a main OS? kek
these days it's all done at the hardware level, kinda irrelevant
it doesn't even use GNU Bash, the standard UNIX shell
WTF do you need TRIM for?
BSD is a meme
Nice meme bsdcuck. Have fun with your performance degradation after mild ssd use.
>standard
whats a standard
whatever i decide is good
>can't do shit
>brags about security
Gee, by that definition, even my FizzBuzz features top notch security.
>try to install OpenBSD on a 500gb HDD
>choose "use whole disk"
>after installation there is 300gb of unused, unformatted, unusable space
>performance degradation
uh no
t. recently built an openbsd CI build machine with a PCI SSD (NGFF x4)
>does not manually edit partition table
you wut
dumbass
It was my first time. The installer gave me the option of automatically partitioning the whole disk. I thought it was going to give me a large /home or /var.
Anyway, what's a good partitioning scheme for OpenBSD?
If you like being behind GNU/Linux 10 years in terms of advancement then yes, it's a good choice.
Yes.
Try it on a spare laptop.
Can someone tell me a proper partitioning scheme for a laptop with an SSD? I also let it automatically partition and ended up with a chunk of unused space. I don't know how big each partition should be. I don't know where it saves installed programs/packages.
There's no recommended partitioning scheme in the FAQ. Why do you post links without checking them?
But the man pages do. Thanks.
openbsd.org
en.wikipedia.org
If you know these 2 things you can decide to partition it other than use your entire capacity for /. If you develop on multiple projects with different code, have different builds, applications that have more growing data in the dir they reside in than the partition than it provides, those are the cases where you think about partitioning and some other things as well. For a typical desktop machine partitioning is overrated and unnecessary.
Doesn't help if you don't understand the file system hierarchy
inb4 that freebsd tranny posting his outdated pasta.
I didn't know I could use the entire hard drive for / and leave it at that.
I highly recommend reading some file system hierarchy on wikipedia. That way you'll get to understand why /boot was enforced for at least a decade as separate partition on *nix systems.
History is always good to know, helps you understand why certain technology has limitations or design flaws, but thanks for the link