Why is it so cringe

Attached: mac.png (319x235, 78K)

Other urls found in this thread:

irif.fr/~boutier/mac-crash.html
news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12857275
twitter.com/AnonBabble

That’s not Windows 10

Do you have any original thoughts about MacOS other than memes?

iminmalism.
itrendy.
icringe.

it makes me feel gay

*iCringey black silhouettes iDance in the background*

If OS.Name != "macOS" Then Goto Next
:macOS
WriteLn("macOS is cringe.")
//WriteLn("Even though I've never even used it.")
Goto macOS
:Next
Because you were programmed to say that.

Attached: 1234567890123.jpg (636x773, 32K)

i used ios for many years and i still think its a steaming pile of shit, i'd have a hard time tossing up between using windows 10 or ios if i were given the choice

>unironically trying the "is a kernel" line
At least we know why you're incapable of thinking, now: your massive brain damage.

the what line? the fact that w10 and ios are both total shithouse operating systems has nothing to do with their kernels? are you trying to make a point or?

>npcs dont use macos

oh the ironing

>npcs only use things that I don't like

>w10, ios etc all OSes are shit. ONLY my Shitdistro choice is not shit.
Grow up.

It's not Linux, but really the most cringeworthy part about Macs are the users.

ios and macos are not the same thing..

because it's a hacked together piece of shit built on GNU hacked together pieces of shit.
What more would you expect?

>macshit
Found your problem.

>built on GNU
Please be bait. You can't be this retarded.

Wintoddlers hate it because they don't know how to use it. GNU users hate it because it is too limiting.

It’s a fully posix compliant unix workspace and considerably nicer than PajeetOS 10

inferior and overpriced

apple is shit

Everything is better than Windows. I can't see any functionality in that mess.

>applel pajeetOS
>posix compliant
Pick one, street shitter.

Attached: 1534397301442.jpg (622x1079, 161K)

>Reee normies use macbooks therefore I hate macOS

Whatever dudes. I've been using OSX/macOS on my hackintosh as a daily driver for years and it's pretty nice. Using GNU/Linux on my Thinkpad and have a spare SSD with Windows on it for gaming. Still prefer the macOS environment for general work and many of my friends in comp sci (primarily bioinformatics cause I'm a med fag) like macOS too.

I don't really get the hate.

Do you even know what POSIX is?

new mbp 13 in is verynice/10.

The tactile feel of the keys is much better than the earlier generation of mbp's.

Do you even know what a toilet is?

Attached: 1514449854100.jpg (643x960, 256K)

Street shit harder Pajeet.

Epic meme. But do you actually know what POSIX is, or are you just upset at mean old Apple?

Because you're so bad, you can't install hackintosh on you toasting machine

Epic meme. But do you actually know what a toilet is, or are you just regurgitating Apple marketing?

Yep, you're just a butthurt winbaby.

I do not like GNU or the utilities labeled GNU.

Attached: 1517968544786.jpg (860x484, 61K)

Yep, you're just an assblasted mactoddler.

yep, both of you are mature gentlemen

Love my custom Mac Air and not being broke. Have a great weekend bud!

Attached: 1410970252271.jpg (236x294, 17K)

>owning a fruit toy worth $150 equates to wealth and not being broke
The ABSOLUTE state of iPoojeet street shitters.

Attached: 1533629582713.jpg (1165x759, 321K)

the newest mac os is pretty compfy

fight me

But MacOS is not built on GNU, you moron. I don't care how you feel.
Epic meme. You still don't know what POSIX is.

see

Epic meme. You still don't know what a toilet is.

Attached: 1543610115977.jpg (835x899, 228K)

xD

Attached: Dinesh Nair, Developer and Platform Evangelist Lead, Microsoft Malaysia FINAL.jpg (1600x1200, 242K)

>1 in 3
>four years ago
It's probably more like 2 in 3 by now.

Attached: 1539194405649.webm (990x720, 2.45M)

>MacOS is not built on GNU
OS X sure is, through the Mach kernel.
>MacOS
That was when they switched to 7.5.
They changed the name of the operating system.
>This is why Jobs is a moron.
System X sounds way better than osX or any derivation thereof.

>through the Mach kernel
*Through XNU, which is a combination of Mach, FreeBSD's kernel, and IOKit

MACTODDLERS BTFO

Attached: 1536852075708.gif (540x304, 1.86M)

>XNU
X is NOT UNIX
>GNU
GNU is NOT UNIX
Mach is GNU.

>through the Mach kernel.
Ok, this has to be trolling now. You can't be this stupid.
>That was when they switched to 7.5.
No, that was Mac OS. It hasn't been OS X (pronounced "ten") for a few years now. It is officially MacOS.

>MacOS
no it isn't.
It is macOS.
System was way different than MacOS.

This basically gnome. Go fuck yourself, OP.

I am smoking a cigarette.
I will probably read and respond if I get any (you)'s.
I grew up with Macintosh.

What the fuck are you on about? All I'm saying is that OS X's kernel isn't Mach.

Fine, it's macOS. But then there is no MacOS at all, since pre-OS X was Mac OS.

He's a retarded pajeet. Just ignore him.

System -> Mac OS -> Mac OS X -> OS X -> macOS

Here, this is Linux

Attached: DeepinScreenshot_20181207232625.png (1600x900, 2.18M)

This is already established, you stupid slav.

No, that is Deepin. Linux is just a kernel.

You two seemed to be confused, I was clearing it up. How'd you know I was slavic?

> I was clearing it up
It didn't need to be cleared up. It was clear.
>How'd you know I was slavic?
By the way you type.

>wangblows
peejet overlord
>screwoogle
peejet overlord
>GNU
foot fungus eating overlord
>apple
white man overlord

i dunno, it's looking pretty clear what one is best

It didn't need to be cleared up. It was clear.
That didn't need to be cleared up, you already told me in your last post.
>By the way you type.
Why would using arrows to indicate successive releases mean I'm slavic? That's just something I picked up on this board.

>That didn't need to be cleared up, you already told me in your last post.
Epic. Way to address what was stated. You are a master of redundancy.
>Why would using arrows to indicate successive releases mean I'm slavic?
Why would you think that was what I was referring to specifically?

>Epic. Way to address what was stated. You are a master of redundancy.
You were redundant so I was too.
>Why would you think that was what I was referring to specifically?
Because that was literally all you had to go off of.

>You were redundant so I was too.
Reiteration is not redundancy.
>Because that was literally all you had to go off of.
Hardly.

You said it, the other guys posted macOS and you criticized it for not being Linux.

>Reiteration is not redundancy.
That wasn't reiteration, it was redundancy.
>Hardly.
What? You know we're talking about this post, right?

No I didn't. Linux is a kernel while macOS is an operating system.

>That wasn't reiteration
Yes it was.
>What?
You can re-read posts, you do realise?
>You know we're talking about this
Yes.

because its trying to create something imperfect in a "perfect" environment (an OS)

SORRY dyslexia, I meant something perfect in an imperfect world

>Yes it was.
Nope.
>You can re-read posts, you do realise?
Duh?
>Yes.
Well that's the only thing to go off of, unless posting Apple operating system names makes you a slav

>Nope.
Good one.
>Duh?
Then don't say "what?". Duh isn't a question, by the way.
>Well that's the only thing to go off of
You think so?

he clearly thought you made multiple posts and you only made one. jesus christ

the "slavic" guess was based on posts that weren't yours

>Duh isn't a question, by the way.
How did I know you were going to stoop that low?

I know, I was just waiting for him to use a post that wasn't mine for evidence. Of course the twat had to be all cryptic instead.

Yeah.
Look at all those changes.
System is way better.

>How did I know you were going to stoop that low?
Oh, I've offended the poor little baby now.

Who said I was offended? I was just saying I could tell you were going to go for the low hanging fruit. While "duh" isn't a question, if actually verbally said it would have been said with a sarcastic and questioning tone, due to the lack of audible cues on this text-based site I denoted the tone using the question mark. You know that though.

So you're offended and don't know how a question mark works. Unsurprising.

Do you enjoy being wrong? Because you just keep going.

based

I'm cool with macOS. It doesn't crash like Windows when using doing photo editing, video editing, layout and graphic design.

>macshitOS
>not crash if you breathe wrong
Pick one.

Attached: 1518613021720.png (588x986, 188K)

I knew I should have documented the hundreds of times Windows fucked me on deadline over the past decade and cost the company I used to work for literally thousands of dollars in overtime pay.

POSIX is a group of standards that determine a portable API for Unix-like operating systems. Mac OSX is Unix-based (and has been certified as such), and in accordance with this is POSIX compliant. POSIX guarantees that certain system calls will be available.

MacOS satisfies the API required to be POSIX compliant, which makes it a POSIX OS.

It’s absolutely posix complaint you brianlet pajeet

Apple have like a 2% market share in India. They all use Windows.

fagOS fails tons of posix requirements and only gets certification by throwing money at the right people
street shit harder poojeet

Source?

You have no idea what you are talking about. OS X is based on Darwin BSD, and since 10.5 (Leopard - 18-May-2007) all Intel/AMD versions have been officially certified as compliant with the Unix 03 / POSIX standard.

Tell me pajeet, which requirements do they fail?

>ipajeet knows nothing except parroting applel marketing bullshit word for word
POO IN LOO

I got no response.
What is up user?

>windows using Pajeet uses ‘No U’
>it’s not very effective

Which POSIX requirement does OSX fail?

>street shitting iPajeet uses ‘No U’
>it’s not very effective

Which POSIX requirement does OSX comply with?

All of them. Literally all of them. Every system call and API required is fully POSIX certified. Both the _POSIX_C_SOURCE and _DARWIN_C_SOURCE have full *nix compatibility. What POSIX requirement do you think it fails?

>All of them.
Ask me how I know you shit in the street.

POSIX specifically talks about things at the layer of system libraries and basic applications, although in describing how they work it also makes some requirements upon lower levels in terms of the features they must supply if not their implementation technique. This means that different systems can take very different approaches in implementing POSIX.

Systems like Linux, macOS, and QNX take a variety of different approaches. Linux provides a monolithic kernel with interfaces specifically oriented towards POSIX, which was the traditional way to implement a Unix system. Both macOS and QNX, on the other hand, have kernels based on the broad idea of microkernels, which attempt to limit the scope of what a kernel is responsible for to a core set of primitives. The rest of the OS interface must then be implemented on top of those, but there are different ways to do that all of which Mac OS satisfy.

Basically yes Mac OS is a posix system.

POSIX is a just pay certificate.

OS X is UNIX 03 certified. That's a formalism.
1) That's a nearly 15-year-old standard (03 == 2003). Windows was certified to the predecessor POSIX standard.
2) While certified, it's compliance in actuality is poor. macOS's certified status says more about flaws in the certification test suite and administrative process, and the OpenGroup's need for income, than it does about macOS. The manual page for pselect, for example, even admits that it's not compliant!
FreeBSD, Linux, NetBSD, OpenBSD and probably DragonflyBSD are all more compliant in a practical sense than macOS, and much more compliant to the latest specification as they implement all or most of the newly defined interfaces, while macOS implements very few.
That said, yeah, macOS is compliant enough as a practical matter, especially compared to Windows. Porting stuff to macOS is about as painful as porting to Solaris or AIX, which is to say not very painful.
The biggest headaches with macOS are the bugs. For example, last week I was adding support for sendmsg/recvmsg and IP_PKTINFO in my Lua unix module and was able to reliably crash the kernel with a single line of unprivileged code:
irif.fr/~boutier/mac-crash.html
I was really confused at first. I had to reboot multiple times before I figured out it was my test code and not my hardware dying. After some Googling I found the above link that verified what I was seeing. This bug was only fixed, AFAIK, in macOS 10.12. (I don't have a 10.11 machine to test.) I was testing the code on 10.10, and as of the latest update a couple of days ago 10.10 is still broken AFAIK.
news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12857275

You would know this if you've programmed a line of POSIX code in your life, but you haven't. You've never programmed a line of code in your life. You're too busy squirting your diarrhea on a dirt road on the outskirts of Mumbai while choking down Timmy's POZ cum.

Attached: 1535187735377.png (500x580, 341K)

MACFAGGOTS UTTERLY DESTROYED LMAO

Attached: 1540048133355.jpg (419x480, 81K)

>these are the people who maintain macos

Attached: 1544211256997.jpg (2016x1210, 285K)

saved