>Post a Mini-Review of your Smartphone >Discuss upcoming and current models >Ask for help related to phones >Tell us how much shekels you spent on good/bad phone
what could go wrong if i buy the SG model of the redmi note 5 instead of the HS?
Leo Nelson
Would the Honor 9 Lite be a good upgrade for a poorlet Moto G2 user?
Lincoln Kelly
5th for Xiameme Mi A2 Lite
Carson Evans
>90 male and 90 female rats low as fuck sample size >RFR-exposed male rats lived longer than non-exposed rats uhh ohh... >In males for both GSM- and CDMA-modulated RFR, we conclude that exposures increased the number of animals with tumors in the heart so the rats that live longer get more cancer wowzies. but lets dig deeper, maybe there is more to it
>9W/kg exposure To heat 1g water by 1K at body temperature you need roughly ~4.175J. Body tissue is majorly made up by water. With 9W/kg they are heating up the rats by more than 0.002K per second or almost 8K per hour (14.4° F for amerifats).
They write that they radiate them for 9 hours every day. They radiated 500g male adult rats with ~35 kcal per day when google says that they need about ~50 kcal per day in food.
That's like radiating an adult human male with 2000kcal of heat every day. Surface sun radiation during a clear summer day during zenith is about 1000W/m2. A human male lying on a beach should get about 500W/s at a body weight of 70kg so the exposure is still below 9W/kg. So the radiation intensity the rats were exposed to was HIGHER than lying on the beach in summer when the sun is hottest and lasted for 9 hours every day. Rats can't sweat, they get rid of excess heat through their tails. So basically they get cooked alive. I am really curious how much this elevated their body temperature.
If you think about it, this makes sense. The radiated rats most likely ate less and many studies show that eating less makes rats live significantly longer. At the same time the permanently elevated body heat probably inflamed their tissue and taxed their organs. The increase in heat also increases the speed of chemical reactions and thus the odds of getting cancer increases.
All these issues with the study just at a quick superficial glance. And no answer provided to how low energy radiation could directly cause cancer.
Ryan Phillips
??
Josiah Brooks
>All these issues with the study just at a quick superficial glance And nothing more is needed, because they're not done on humans.
Mason Ortiz
SH model just had better band coverage for US, B2, B4 and B5, whereas SG has only B4 and B5.
