This can't be correct ... right?

This can't be correct ... right?

Attached: Screenshot 2018-12-04 16.12.40.png (1920x1080, 1.6M)

Other urls found in this thread:

anandtech.com/show/13683/intel-euvenabled-7nm-process-tech-is-on-track
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Right. Just wait for the amdrone suicides in January.

Of course not, 2700x has 8 cores at 4.3Ghz turbo

The 3700x claims the SAME TDP, but 12 cores and 5Ghz Turbo.

Can't possibly be accurate.

No, its not, but the question is not if it is all 100% correct, the question is how close it is.

Attached: 1497642518713.png (653x726, 66K)

Anyone who knows the history of die shrinks or adoredtv knows its a lie

>better-than threadripper 2950x performance for just 450 burgers
of course it's not, but I'm taking it with a grain of salt anyway just in case it turns out good

16% Faster single core boost isn't that hard to believe at all. 64 core epycs can't have much higher TDP than the 7601s

>16% Faster single core boost isn't that hard to believe at all
it is when you couple in the increased core count from 8 core to 12 core.

If you'd told me it was moving from 8 to 12 core with a modest 200mhz clockspeed increase, sure i'd believe that. But 12 cores AND 700mhz faster? Come on. That'd be pulling 150w+

Isn't the guy who posted this a massive amd shill?