Do birds exist

do birds exist

Attached: DXgQoJMVMAAkYrm.jpg (500x400, 36K)

yes

NSA-controlled spybot

no

maybe

Only storms and Aztecs.

Attached: 1529137407689.jpg (640x640, 45K)

I don't know

Can you repeat the question?

Huh?

no

what's a bird?

It's time for you people to WAKE UP! We all need to acknowledge that what we call "birds" are just GOVERNMENT SPY DRONES. Wake yourself up from the lie. Resist the bird drones that steal your information and spy on you. Don't feed them, because you'll be giving them your biometric information. They store the food and return it to motherbase later on. Birds are now inorganic machines designed to surveil and police us. Kill the next bird you see, let them know that YOU WONT ACCEPT THEM.

Bird is a made up term from a made-up language, the physical thing exists in our perception but is it really a bird.

Yes I've experienced their presence

does anything really exist?

If you perceive it, it exists.

no, they are just a social construct

thats a birb, not a bird

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux,
is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux.
Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component
of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell
utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day,
without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU
which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are
not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a
part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system
that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run.
The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself;
it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is
normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system
is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux"
distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

WE JUST DON'T KNOW

That's a big bird.

4u

burds are shit tier animals

Hmmm yes more please

I'm terribly sorry for interjecting another moment, but what I just told you is GNU/Linux is, in fact, just Linux, or as I've just now taken to calling it, Just Linux. Linux apparently does happen to be a whole operating system unto itself and comprises a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Most computer users who run the entire Linux operating system every day already realize it. Through a peculiar turn of events, I was misled into calling the system "GNU/Linux", and until now, I was unaware that it is basically the Linux system, developed by the Linux project.

There really isn't a GNU/Linux, and I really wasn't using it; it is an extraneous misrepresentation of the system that's being used. Linux is the operating system: the entire system made useful by its included corelibs, shell utilities, and other vital system components. The kernel is already an integral part of the Linux operating system, never confined useless by itself; it functions coherently within the context of the complete Linux operating system. Linux is never used in combination with GNU accessories: the whole system is basically Linux without any GNU added, or Just Linux. All the so-called "GNU/Linux" distributions are really distributions of Linux.