*saves your data for 1000 years*

*saves your data for 1000 years*

Attached: Logo_of_M-DISC.svg.png (800x823, 50K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ollydbg.de/Paperbak/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_corruption
multipar.eu/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>the exact properties of M-DISC are a trade secret
>according to a test of the French National Laboratory of Metrology and Testing at 90 °C and 85% humidity, for 1,000 hours, the DVD+R with inorganic recording layer such as M-DISC showed similar deterioration in quality as other conventional discs with an organic recording layer, with a maximum lifetime of below 250 hours.

>Testing at 90 °C and 85% humidity

Attached: 15339794153210.jpg (524x600, 71K)

>not planning for global climate warming

The absolute state of French """science""".

>Not planning for a myth
FTFY

Well, the laser does warm it up, even in read mode

It's to simulate 1000 years of exposure to lower temperature and humidity fluctuations. It's a well established practice, and gives a good idea of what to expect.

>*saves your data for 1000 years*

WinRar + Recovery record of sufficient size + redundancy = same protection on any media you want

Not that brainlets understand this

>WinRar
Good luck trying to read that proprietary mess after Windows and x86 bite the dust.

x86 emulation will always be a thing because of it's importance in early (read: up until present) computing.

Meme disc

>WinRar
Nigger, what the fuck are you doing?

[CITATION NEEDED]

>winrar

Attached: 1534863834041.jpg (412x398, 59K)

>shitty M Disc with now rare legendary golden era anime pics dies somehow in it's 970th year
>have to search for long sealed away receipt to get my money back

Attached: 1512140251986.png (1200x788, 165K)

Remember when they said the same thing for CDs?

>90 °C
>lower temperature

what

Redpill me on M-discs. Should I blow up $80 for a BD-R drive?

>Should I blow up $80 for a BD-R drive?
Yes. Not even for M-DISCS. BD is absolutely amazing for archiving your shit. I do all my backups on BD except of course heavy stuff like clonezilla images. It's cheap and amazing for sorting your archives because you can put your BDs in nice jewel cases with propper labels.

M-Disc BTFO'd
>proprietary garbage with bogus claims
oh wow how exciting

Don't you mean
>Not planning for Chinese/lizard hoax
Exposure to lowet temperatures than 90C

***********1000 years

Really trust them over hdds? Hdds have become exceedingly cheap

I have a few M-Disks, but what do you actually use them for?

Apart from documents and one off's like wedding photos, they are still too small.

Sure you can get 100GB disks, but you are entering HDD money, and its just cheaper and easier to have a few drives on rotation.

Attached: synology-f-DS1813pback-top.jpg (1258x676, 92K)

No ECC and no ZFS on that piece of junk.

You're a big guy

Data integrity isn't for kids, so why buy a toy?

Attached: 1541695961068.jpg (167x250, 23K)

You can roll your own NAS, sure

If you implement 3-2-1 backup, it really doesn't matter what you backup on.
Just use whatever you feel like family

You can even backup to paper:
ollydbg.de/Paperbak/

Attached: 1511172036616.jpg (500x375, 26K)

>If you implement 3-2-1 backup, it really doesn't matter what you backup on.

Oh, is that so. How do you protect against data rot without ZFS? Don't tell me you compute a hash of every single file on the drive? user..

>You can even backup to paper (...)

How do you protect against OCR errors (essentially bit flips)? user, this isn't good enough. See me after class.

Attached: 1486627321137.jpg (150x150, 6K)

My entire array is shedding sectors.

A simple 3-2-1 would have left me with hopeless corrupt shit everywhere in my backups without checksum scrubs.

It still works so I don't bother to replace any disks until they fully fault.

Attached: 1529138255084.jpg (750x738, 52K)

o-okay

Attached: 1492566319784.gif (280x302, 3.75M)

Read this:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_corruption

Attached: 1442210340928.jpg (700x700, 218K)

>image

Attached: cena_despair.gif (320x180, 1.77M)

You can trust both.

>WinRar

Sorry, but you meant to say PAR technology there, son.

multipar.eu/