Firefox 64 release. Why haven't you upgraded Jow Forums?

Firefox 64 release. Why haven't you upgraded Jow Forums?
archive.fo/psJLe

Attached: 1523310751731.png (652x369, 15K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.fo
spyware.neocities.org/articles/waterfox.html
web.archive.org/web/20180721175114/https://digdeeper.neocities.org/images/wfox.png
groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.builds/RaeGCwcPYg8
ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/64.0/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>archive.fo
>for a "firefox upgraded to new version"
you need to go back

Always archive everything.

>Why haven't you upgraded
I like Chrome, thanks

>Why haven't you upgraded Jow Forums?
I have removed this awful browser the moment they dropped proper extensions, since it had nothing to offer over chromium.

They they fucked up sandboxing with ALSA and have no intention to fix it.

Fuck Mozilla and fuck FireFox.

What cancerous nu-dev bloat/telemetry did they add this time?

>archive.fo
Thanks for the rootkit faggot.

Attached: way ahead of you.png (790x407, 65K)

Because I am on ESR.

>using a version with more telemetry
Based

>using a version with more telemetry
Based.

Attached: Capture.png (669x320, 39K)

>SJWfox
Cringe.

Attached: 1538727447228.png (416x435, 114K)

>Cringe
>Wojak
fag

>fag
Offensive much? Enjoy getting banned from your GitHub project for not respecting the Code of Conduct.

Attached: coraline.jpg (360x640, 90K)

>sudo pacman -Syu
>no new firefox
WHAT THE FUCK I THOUGHT THIS SHIT WAS BLEEDING EDGE

>Why haven't you upgraded Jow Forums?
I've already said goodbye to Firefox and moved to Brave.

It's a trick, DO NOT UPGRADE, YOU WILL LOSE YOUR Jow Forums THREAD WATCHER and have to start it all over again. Once you *are* ready for that, however, just go to your Firefox menu>help>about for the update.

>using a fork made by some underage

Not an argument nigger, Waterfox is Firefox with less spying and no SJW.

Also has a higher addon compatibility.

Attached: waterfox.png (534x322, 17K)

what did they ruin this time

Meritocracy.

>not using superior ungoogled chromium

If you're using a jewgle browser, you have zero room to talk.

>defaulting to bing
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, kys

Waterfox does nothing other than disable a couple of about:config entries you can disable yourself. It's original purpose was to provide a 64bit version of Firefox back in the days when Mozilla didn't compile Firefox to 64bit, which they started to do years ago. Waterfox is now useless and it's devs only spread FUD. It's 7 versions behind Firefox, 4 versions behind Firefox ESR and it's not even Firefox 57 (quantum) yet.

spyware.neocities.org/articles/waterfox.html

how to change the update channel???
i need to test some beta feature

I don't, I'm on Waterfox currently.

Because when I'm not in Nightly I'm on EAR
Stable is only worth for Android devices, since there's no official ESR channel

>spyware.neocities.org
There is always one retard that comes up with that blog. I wonder if it's always the same.

As we've told you every time, the website is dubious at best, half of the links are 404, we have no idea when the last test was made, no information on the browser version tested, etc.

Also, you still pretend like if Waterfox is basically "The 64bit Firefox" even though they moved a long way since, and you know it, but you pretend not to.
In short, you're retarded.

Where is my developer toolbar

>using a version changed and compiled by literally some random dude on the internet
>complaining about telemetry (that can be disabled)

they improve memory usage firefox can map more memory now. 2 tab 5gb.

they removed RSS feeds for some reason

>just use addons lol

literally in the patch notes

>using mozzarella fireshit

Attached: Untitled.png (636x361, 214K)

It's open source you retard.
Also, everyone is a "random dude on the internet", you have literally no argument.

Waterfox is Firefox, with less spying and no SJW. Good enough for me.

>using telemetry based os

>Using Yiff in Hell Moon

>pale moon
>Your Browser, Our Way
>don't even dare talking about the addons we ban because we don't like them

>don't even dare talking about the addons we ban because we don't like them
You mean like the thousands that got removed from mozilla ?

>best version of FF before it all went to shit
>still supports old addons
How can modern furfox even compete?

>hey don't trust this dude, he's a murderer
>yeah but STALIN KILLED MILLIONS, so it's okay

Not an argument.
Also, yes, Mozilla bans addons too, which is why I don't use Mozilla either.

There is any way to turn off the Firefox telemetry?

>go to github
>download addon
>install it
I'm not seeing the problem?

>There is any way to turn off the Firefox telemetry?
Not entirely, no.

It might be open source, but it was compiled by some random person, so you don't know what source was compiled. Retard

Niggy, just stop crying, waterfox is irrelevant. At this point, you might as well use chrome

Still no argument, huh.

What fucking add-ons are everyone so pissed about that you can't use with Quantum? I haven't had any issues.

>upgraded
>to Firefox

Kek m8

because every update contains worthless new bloat and design regressions, and any purported focus on privacy has long since passed. it has basically become windows 10 the browser.

>He uses Windows

>Why haven't you upgraded Jow Forums?
Because I switched to Chrome.

Attached: dab.gif (511x295, 975K)

Chringe and downgrade

no u

>quantum

>The new layout is not well suited for small browser windows.
thanks mozilla

Yes, but you have to check for new things every update if you aren't on ESR

>pentdactyl
>session manager
>downthemall
>tabs always in title bar
>menu wizard
>advanced cookie manager
>cache viewer
>tab groups manager revived
>request policy
>tab counter
>tab mix plus
My hatred for mozilla is higher than when they removed the download window and fucked the look of tabs, thankfully PM has an addon for that

>all useless garbage bloat
wow, thank god mozilla knows whats best for you

>half the links are 404
That's the point of the archives. Are you retarded or just pretending? There's a literal archive next to each link.
web.archive.org/web/20180721175114/https://digdeeper.neocities.org/images/wfox.png

>useless bloat
>makes browsing easy with the keyboard easy, with powerful keybinds and commands, essential for browsing with a laptop and great easy of use on a desktop
>can easily save multiple sessions to use
>easily download hundreds of images or videos, with regex filter
>can customize your menu easily to have what you want on it
>saves vertical pixels
>can let you browse and delete the cookies you want
>let's you easily find images in the cache, their source and save them from the cache
>get tab groups back so you don't have to open more windows
>privacy and security
>useful to know the amount of tabs you have to navigate with the keyboard
>tab options to complement
The only thing mozilla managed to do right was fix the image scaling problem back then, then it all went to shit.

>not addressing everything else
This is your blog, isn't it.
You're pretty sad.

You just don't seem to understand how the automated builds for actual open source software work? There is a proper chain of trust that makes sure that only the code currently being in the repo for the current release gets compiled. With waterfox just the dev knows what he actually is compiling

>autism

I switched back to Firefox because of one thing: DNS over HTTPS. Now I can circumvent the stupid censors, website blocking, and throttling in my country without fucking around with VPNs or proxies. All by just enabling the DoH toggle. It LITERALLY just werks.


t. Third World Fag

I set mine to securedns.eu and it's still blocked for me. For rarbg it says page unavailable, they don't even tell you it's blocked.

Because I switched to Chromium
I don't want to use browser marching to irrelevance

Attached: 2018-12-11-235402_1181x597_scrot.png (1181x597, 85K)

I upgraded long ago, Moshilla.

Attached: waterfox.png (3440x1440, 203K)

>not using chad nightly

Attached: Screenshot_74.png (662x302, 45K)

The mega extension was confirmed to be a compromised botnet a few months ago I believe.

I just use it to download porn

Also, it's for the Megasync program, which AFAIK is open source.

I have, it sucks

I switched to Brave and desu i preferred Firefox but i'm stubborn so i'm going to stick it out and force myself to like it.

I set it to Cloudflare DNS (it's the default I think) and have no issues with it.

I switched my group of friends to Firefox by saying that you can finally browse porn without a VPN. There's no better incentive than that for normies.

>chad nightly
>can't disable telemetry fully like in the beta and stable version
Sure thing

Nightly sucks

I'm still laughing with the NEW webp support on firefox, i though it was implemented years ago cause it was on waterfox since version 40

>complaining about telemetry (that can be disabled)

>Receive update, some of the about config entries does nothing anymore cause they've changed the names slightly just for the lulz

>Added new telemetry layers with new about:entry configs only mentioned on some obscure bugzilla thread.

>Running telemetry studies on users without proper communicating it cause that will screw the obtained data.

nah

Attached: firefox.png (998x538, 335K)

Firefox now consume more memory than chromium based browser unless you have lot of tabs opened, and just until they do a proper spectre/meltdown fix similar to strict site isolation on blink (now they have just fucked all the timers to mitigate it) that will further increase memory usage per tab.

did you know that soon (maybe already i haven't look it out) node.js will be a dependency to build firefox.

Attached: 1539716529307.png (1920x1080, 690K)

So pocket needs to be built in but rss and ftp must go...

is it gtk? I dislike whatever shit firefox is using nowadays

here it is groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.builds/RaeGCwcPYg8

NodeJS is a hard dependency for firefox 64+ it's using the fucking chrome v8

why would i use 57+ shit? it took me years to move from 28 chad. seriously 4-28 was the best times of firefox

Attached: firefox.jpg (1366x768, 312K)

ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/64.0/

>that resolution
>that OS
>French
go back to Morocco, Jamal.

I could tolerate switching to quantum and killing old extensions for dubious reasons and these gay fucking pictures everywhere, but killing RSS is seriously pissing me off.
Was there even a good reason to do it? Are there any other browsers that have both noscript and ublock/matrix?

Attached: 1317281232891.gif (525x446, 23K)

>implying i havent

still no session manager

Great. It requires Rust and now even Nodejs. What next? I fucking hate webdevs

I'm kinda considering it based on the recent changes to Chrome.
Don't get me wrong, I don't care that much about the tabs themselves, it's more the fact they removed two features from the flags that I liked.

You know how you could right-click a tab and you had the option to bookmark all tabs? Well, now you need to first right click and select all tabs before being able to bookmark them all at once.

Can you ctrl-a-click?

>nothing to offer besides fingerprinting/tracking protection that actually works compared to brave
>nothing to offer besides being the sole browser on the planet to protect against all kinds of zombie cookies with ease

Also if no sandbox is a concern for you and you are on Linux you are retarded. Chrome doesn't run under a sandbox in Arch because the arch devs wisely enough disabled user namespaces which chrome uses to sandbox which in turn increase the attack vector by double of the security gained. after all Google is your foe not your friend you idiot. the seccomp Filter are just there to silence idiots enquiring about chromium security model. you'd be better off without namespaces and only seccomp which still is led secure than a stock Firefox run under for example firejail

also i run Firefox sandboxed without pulseaudio and it works fine. and who needs playable audio from the browser anyway. literally just send the url to mpv and you have way more comfort and no additional tracking. literally a button click to play media in a native player that has features other people can only dream of but you choose to play it inside a web browser instead

welcome to Jow Forums

>wants quantum
>"oh no it's retarded!"

No, however Ctrl-Shift-D to bookmark all still works.

congrstulstilns you are easier to fingerprint and track than using stock Google Chrome. And I am not even kidding. Brave had more entropy than stock Google Chrome. Go run fp scripts on it. People seem to forget that Brendan Eich,who is Jewish and got fired from Mozilla, got his investor funds by multiple advertising and tracking companies. just sniff the internet traffic brave creates on startup without you doing anything. connects to lots of shady advertisers. include that with being so easy to fingerprint.

By using Brave you give your data to both Google and Brendan Jew Eich. By using Chrome you only Gove it to Google. What sounds more reasonable ?

Damn, mentioning Brave on Jow Forums really does bring out the FUD.