Daaaammmmnnnn unix looks like that!?

Neither windows or Linux are POSIX compliant, Linux is POSIX like but hasn’t had the certification. Apple has clang which compiles c using the same functionality as the gcc, which was only written to mimic existing unix functionality.

And the gcc is in no way compatable with windows except through compatibility layers like cywngin, etc. As it is a horrible pajeet non posix os

POSIX is a specification

>unix.org/what_is_unix/single_unix_specification.html AFAIK

Linux adheres to the spec, but hasn't certified yet

WSL allows for lower level compatibility. gcc basically runs natively now.

GCC is fully compatible with MacOS and is a fully maintained package on brew

>$ brew install gcc

Windows baby

>winpajeet shilling WSL

It doesn’t even have /dev/ support and is slow as molasses. Windows having to implement another OS to have basic functionality isn’t a plus for windows I guess.

Enjoy your glorified ssh client.

>Neither windows or Linux are POSIX compliant, Linux is POSIX like but hasn’t had the certification.
retarded apple shills don't know about K-UX and EulerOS, two POSIX-certified enterprise Linux distros

POO
IN
LOO

Attached: 1525571319236.png (1178x3797, 1.6M)

>windows 10 has posix compliance because of WSL

There is no way you are not trolling

you can lash out all you like, but nothing will ever change the fact that you're a no life loser that spends every waking hour of his street shitting life worshipping a fruity fag cult
one day you'll wake up as a cringey 40 year old virgin still worshipping your fruit toys and your grandma will neck herself upon realizing she raised such a pathetic incel
you will die alone, seething, and clutching a framed portrait of your syrian sandnegro messiah surrounded by your fruity babby toys

LITERALLY ALONE IN YOUR GRANNY'S BASEMENT ON CHRISTMAS SHILLING iTOYS

L M A O
M
A
O

archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/image/z-AKUCW9z3QIuaU6QRbRHg/
archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/image/cI3_tmP5xpFTGlWmEg9goQ/
archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/image/PtGv4iC-jRbex3Xw592fAw/
archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/image/_glUELz4vv9hjRZ8x1cIKg/
archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/image/VNbuaDIfThMAlAASqaI0Kw/
archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/image/epKkMUP2mAJphUDLwAIY4w/
archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/image/llF-zz9URlbvsF7nE4mG0w/
archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/image/LDMvhb3n444ISJRI9u7YZQ/
archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/image/uskkuBo91wIlsRF2wxGiLg
archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/search/image/cqSr-2OIIrWCcTMw_U-HEw/
warosu.org/g/image/wTFExNUp-vmyQ6BilZoT7A

Attached: 1530943568900.jpg (1336x873, 287K)

If they’ve gone through open group certification they’re official posix I guess.

Windows on the other hand...

Even your file structure is incompatible, I mean what the fuck is up with \?

>t. Too stupid for unix

Reminder OS X 10.5 was the last certified Unix OS X.

Mojave was certified in August what are you talking about brainlet? I think you mean every OS since 10.5.

Pic related, Mojave’s certification here

Attached: 203B30F4-25DE-4BE2-B716-31963F09C587.jpg (540x960, 67K)

We had this thread yesterday.

How can it be certified when it’s missing half of POSIX?

OpenBSD is more Unix than OS X.

>missing half of POSIX
>in reply to a post showing their full POSIX compliance

Absolute brainlet MacOS fulfils every requirement, that’s what the certification means. You are using words you don’t know kek

Considering both Mac and OpenBSD use the BSD posix requirements they’re literally identical. MacOS being a genetic descendant of BSD. But you knew that right?

If OS X is certified Unix, then what are you really asking?

Are you asking how close is it to the traditional gui-less Unix from the 80's?

Well, in that case, one can ask, how Windows is Windows 7? It's certainly "official" windows, but it doesn't feel anything like Window 95, let alone 3.1, not to mention MS-DOS. Does that make it any less of a Windows?

Just because normal (non-tech) users don't see the Unix underneath the GUI, doesn't make OS X any less Unix than it is.

/thread
Report the iPajeet and ignore.

Samefag iPajeet shill. Is that you CapSoc?

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

Sexy af

projecting streetshitter lmao