Yes, unironically. It takes a little longer to set up and you shouldn't fatfinger through everything because proper configuration matters, but after that it's solid as fuck as a daily driver and updates very very rarely break anything. Much stabler than Ubuntu and it's a fucking rolling distro. You can go for Antergos as well if you want to take some shortcuts.
2015+4
Forgot to mention, I'm not a ricer and actually use my battlestation to work remotely and homelab, no problems whatsoever derived from using Arch.
Probably at this point, if I had to use Linux as my main machine rather than something I just boot up into VM for particular tasks, I'd use Arch.
But fuck Linux. BSD is way better.
Yes, though I don't understand all the fuss over arch from both sides.
I understand that its possible for an update to break it, but the only problem my 4 year install has had was a version mismatch with the nvidia kernel module.
People that say it's the best distro are silly, there is no best distro.
Used Ubuntu from 10.04 to 14.10, literally all version bumps broke my system.
yes, its the distro that requires the least amount of maintenance, so why not.
initial setup takes a bit longer but once you create a dotfiles repo setting up new machines is fast.
I installed arch for the first time with no videos, only the basic install guide yesterday. It took less than an hour and it wasn't hard. Maybe it's because I have a clue.
No one actually runs LFS, while many people actually use Gentoo.
>made by a project created by a jew
>white man's distro
oy vey
The good version of Arch is the one that doesn't exist.