>I've never seen a load where a non-HT processor performed better than the HT processor conterpart.
you can see it literally all the fucking time, especially if you look at 9900k and 9700k gaming performance reviews.
They're literally identical, with the 9700k occasionally winning because hyperthreading really is fucking garbage tier.
>Hyperthreading is garbage
Imagine being so dumb that you applaud features being taken away
which 1440p VA monitor has the best response time for gmaing?
It's possible, but in terms of single core performance, the 2700x is identical to the 6600k.
Multicore performance is easily double the 6600k, but if you're mainly hitting games that rely on single core performance, the majority of that upgrade will come from the GPU, not the CPU.
>0.1% performance difference
delid dis, 7nm ISNT REAAAAALLLLLLLL
All it takes is one playthrough of a modern Assassin's Creed game and you'll cry to replace a 4 core i5.
fair enough, i'm just saying i'd be pretty fuckin pissed spending $400+ on a new CPU after 3 years that gives identical single core performance
just doesn't sit right with me.
you're probably right, just looking for an excuse to upgrade.
current psu is a Corsair CX600M, that should be sufficient for the 2070 right?
>stuttering doesn't matter
>1080p benchmarks