/pcbg/ - PC Building General

pcpartpicker.com/list/kygCHh
>If I wasn't poor

well first of all, i5 is the easiest option to assemble and its about as easy to handle as any X cpu on amd, leaving only ram trainning to do manually

BUTT

the minimun FPS was pretty bad and almost always didnt matched 2600
H and B mobos on intel will not let you have memory above 2666, wich is why the test was literally done twice with intel.
a z mobo is OC tier and so you should use the i5 K version anyway. if you are luckly intel XTU will allow you to use the unlocked bus speed and OC a tiny but but you cant count on it.
you paid as much for the F variant that you did for the standard variant. the difference is F doesnt have the iGPU. supposely K versions will OC better because the iGPU power rails will be used as well, meaning at least one more phase when OCing but who knows.

so theres some weird stuff happening in these tests

Attached: 1539471699616.png (512x512, 129K)

Why does SSD speed get obliterated on Intel systems after security patches?

>Watercooled ryzen vs stock intel
>intel still wins
yikes

Now check minimum fps lol

It doesn't really.

Does it impact somewhat? Sure, but outside of benchmarks you'd never notice a difference unless you're in a VERY niche use-case, which a home user would 99.99999% of the time, not be.

Attached: 2019-05-07 11_38_47.png (769x820, 104K)

It's already there. Intel still better

Heard it here folks, 118 < 115

Is he right?

Considering Intels turbo abilities with a better cooler, the 9400f can probably handle it's all-core turbo for much longer, likely providing better minimum FPS since it wouldn't throttle itself from shitty stock cooler.