Seems a bit impractical then even if not hard to solve. Does Void suffer from this problem too?
What the hell, Jow Forums lied to me
Xavier Bailey
Colton Perez
Most of the people shittalking Arch probably never even ran it, or they tried to install it and failed. I’ve honestly had less issues with Arch than I did with Ubuntu. Also issues in Arch usually get fixed in a few days, meanwhile an issue in Ubuntu usually leads to a several months old bug report with no solution.
Jack Cooper
Yes. Even among Debian- or RPM-based distributions there's no automagical solution to adopt changed configuration files to a new format, you only get to keep your current or the new version or an assisted three-way merge at best.
Chances are that you're not installing new major release of software with those which have significantly changed configuration files, enough.
Gabriel King
Interesting, is it easy to fix that "issue"?
Elijah Rivera
Fedora Silverblue, NixOS and Guixsd
David Sullivan
Its literally editing a text file.
You either switch to the new config files and configure it to your needs again, or use some mergetool like vimdiff or meld to pull the changes from upstream.
It depends on your preference really.
Angel Perez
I see, thanks for the help user
Bentley Ross
>Installs Arch
Based.
Nathan Lopez
Arch has no policy against distributing nonfree software through their normal channels, and nonfree blobs are shipped with their kernel, Linux.
Instead of this nonfree distribution, use Parabola or Hyperbola, free distros which are made from it.
William Jones
Richard, I...