Here's your high performance ARM Board

Here's your high performance ARM Board.

Yeah it's not A77 or A76 or A75 or A73 and the clocks are half what you'd get inside a smartphone but who cares right. Now pay up.

Attached: trash.png (1000x750, 743K)

Other urls found in this thread:

96boards.org/product/hikey970/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Why all these threads about "high performance" Raspberry Pi? That was never the purpose. Community is where it is at.

>30 euros
>slower than a 500 euro phone
could it be?

Can Pis be corebooted?

because intel is gay

>30euros
>slower than 100euro chinkphone
>doesnt even come in a case
>or a screen
>or a battery

Seems quite a bit worse to me than a Rock64Pro or a Odroid N2

>Why all these threads about "high performance" Raspberry Pi?
The RPis other than maybe the Zero are pretty bad. Don't bother with these.

Udoo bolt starts shipping in June.

To rephrase the question: can any single-board computer run coreboot?

>everyone going for MOAR POWAH
And meanwhile I just want some lower power minimal shit just to run pihole+unbound

Zoomers have been raised to spend all their money on the newest shiny things. They cannot comprehend the idea of not being a customer.

Attached: 1536692118738.png (657x777, 23K)

buy a chinese knock off raspberry for 80 euros then if thats what you want bucko

This. Fuck ARM with your gf's leg.

I would but guess what, there's nothing like that.

>not wanting to buy outdated slow garbage is bad

kys you dumb r*dditor.

what do you mean?
there are even lots of arm single board computers on aliexpress
you could buy a nvidia single board computer
the jetson nano even has the same GPIO support RPis have

How about, what do (You) mean? They still run on the same shitty CPU, they are going to be just as slow.

no?
of course small single board arm computers aren't full x86_64 PCs but some are significantly faster than others
just buy a itx computer if you dont want arm, GPIO and power efficiency

Did you read the OP? What's so hard to understand? Find me a board that doesn't run on an outdated ARM Core and lower speeds that a fucking smartphone.

>inb4 A72 is outdated
At least you can't complain about the clock speeds, but you will.

Attached: ae6138504e6055c5cab3235fffc377b4.jpg (675x1260, 313K)

ok, this one has the same chip as my phone
https:// www . aliexpress . com/item/Single-Board-Computer-VIM2-Basic-Of-Khadas-With-Amlogic-S912-1-5-GHz-64Bit-Octa-Core/32997308567.html?spm=2114.search0104.3.7.55c421124LVsLA&ws_ab_test=searchweb0_0,searchweb201602_4_10065_10068_10890_10547_319_10546_317_10548_10696_10084_453_454_10083_10618_10304_10307_10820_537_536_10059_10884_10887_321_322_10103,searchweb201603_52,ppcSwitch_0&algo_expid=7940dbe3-1f10-4aaf-b116-5e11820df402-1&algo_pvid=7940dbe3-1f10-4aaf-b116-5e11820df402&transAbTest=ae803_5

96boards.org/product/hikey970/
Kirin 970 (A73+A53) based.

>R3399

My dude, that's the same SoC as the OP. And yes, the A72 is outdated, the A76 is almost twice as fast and consumes a bit less power.

>A53

Anemic efficiency cores, lol.

>96boards.org/product/hikey970/

That's not terrible but 320$, really?

>hurr durr cheap chink phones have better cores
>post literal chink phone CPU
can your sick fantasies never be quenched?

>the A76 is almost twice as fast and consumes a bit less power.
It's not. Even ARM promoted 35% performance increase for the same power.

Pretty sure thats vs the A75 or A73, the RK3399 uses A72.

i hope so

>Pretty sure thats vs the A75 or A73, the RK3399 uses A72.
Nope, it was specifically vs the A72.

this faggot is too stupid to understand markets, niches and marketing in general

no one would buy a $300 board you fucking inbreed imbecile.

this is why cheap shit is cheap

Do you have a source/screen of that?

Pic unrelated.

Attached: cantfind.png (777x547, 95K)

Try reading the article you took that from.

okay brainlet.

>Arm expects that the A76 will deliver a 35% performance boost over the existing A72 core.

But the benchmarks show a bigger boost in performance.

>In broad metrics, what we’re promised in actual products using the A76 is the follows: a 35% performance increase alongside 40% improved power efficiency. We’ll also see a 4x improvements in machine learning workloads thanks to new optimisations in the ASIMD pipelines and how dot products are handled. These figures are baselined on A75 configurations running at 2.8GHz on 10nm processes while the A76 is projected by Arm to come in at 3GHz on 7nm TSMC based products.

Attached: picrelated.png (701x363, 44K)

The benchmarks SUPPLIED BY ARM, who also state that they expect it will deliver 35% performance boost.

Also, that is an IPC comparison, not performance comparison.

Word of ARM
>Compared to an A72 core at 10 nm, a 7-nm A76 should deliver 35% more performance or use 40% less power.
Word of ??
>what we’re promised in actual products using the A76 is the follows: a 35% performance increase alongside 40% improved power efficiency.

Those are ARM slides my dude, maybe the earlier 35% uplift was a worst case scenario or just a more conservative prediction? I don't know, it's from an Anand article but the slides are all ARM. Also i feel like in this case IPC is more important than frequency since to keep costs down the SoC's these small boards use are fabbed on old, mature nodes.

JETSON
NANO

Zoomers are so fucking stupid.