Try reading the article you took that from.
Here's your high performance ARM Board
okay brainlet.
>Arm expects that the A76 will deliver a 35% performance boost over the existing A72 core.
But the benchmarks show a bigger boost in performance.
>In broad metrics, what we’re promised in actual products using the A76 is the follows: a 35% performance increase alongside 40% improved power efficiency. We’ll also see a 4x improvements in machine learning workloads thanks to new optimisations in the ASIMD pipelines and how dot products are handled. These figures are baselined on A75 configurations running at 2.8GHz on 10nm processes while the A76 is projected by Arm to come in at 3GHz on 7nm TSMC based products.
The benchmarks SUPPLIED BY ARM, who also state that they expect it will deliver 35% performance boost.
Also, that is an IPC comparison, not performance comparison.
Word of ARM
>Compared to an A72 core at 10 nm, a 7-nm A76 should deliver 35% more performance or use 40% less power.
Word of ??
>what we’re promised in actual products using the A76 is the follows: a 35% performance increase alongside 40% improved power efficiency.
Those are ARM slides my dude, maybe the earlier 35% uplift was a worst case scenario or just a more conservative prediction? I don't know, it's from an Anand article but the slides are all ARM. Also i feel like in this case IPC is more important than frequency since to keep costs down the SoC's these small boards use are fabbed on old, mature nodes.
JETSON
NANO
Zoomers are so fucking stupid.