Oh no no no no no no

just when we thought we were free they pull us back in

Attached: hXsbahevdREZvkSQ.jpg (719x568, 75K)

Other urls found in this thread:

elchapuzasinformatico.com/2019/06/amd-ryzen-5-3600-x570-review/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

What are you planning to do to cope in a couple of weeks when the actual reviews come out?

omersinso fumando marihoana ajaja

I will be writing sternly worded letters to ayymd about how they let us down once again.

Sure will be fun running 3733Mhz DDR4 goy

du madre es una puta de la noche e yo voy ar matar las pinche negros

Attached: images.jpg (259x194, 7K)

Dios mio!
>El Chapuzas
>Mejor a menor

Well that explains why AMD focused so heavily on ddr4 support.
Getting 5,000mhz support was kinda redflag for me.
That fast ram is required to offset high latency.

3733Mhz DDR4 won't be too expensive once you facor in the overall costs. At that speed Infinity Fabric will be running at 1 to 1 which is optimal. Wait for benchmarks.

A brainlet from /v/ who doesn't understand how RAM latency works appears!

>factor in

Another
Massive
Disappointment

Attached: 1559546615064.jpg (277x277, 17K)

STFU pedo

its ok user, they used inferior memory because they had issues with getting their flareX running at 3200CL14

realistic latency is around 56NS

>muh 7 nanometers
>muh superior chink manufacturers
>muh cores
>muh chiplets
>muh better yields
>muh major performance increase
>muh wait for Ryzen 3 to upgrade your PC
>muh Intel is struggling to keep up

>Muh Intel
>INTEL!!!

Habían puesto que iban dar seguimiento con la x570, ¿qué pasó con eso?
That result is extremely sus. A big regression over previous gen feels very weird to me especially with the cache gains. Either AMD fucked up or the reviewer is just pulling shit out of the ass.

it's a lateral move where you are smoke screened with more cores

>MUH Latency
>does not take into account the fact that it outpaces last gen's 8-core variant in gaming benchmarks, with a gimped BIOS.
>$200 vs $500 CPU
this level of cope is over 9900K!

>beta bios
>unoptimal RAM for Zen2
>surprised at high latency

barsinson

>hurr bigger CAS numba means more latency rite guys?
Go and run wrist first into a box cutter

Correct chipset now, and nothing changed: elchapuzasinformatico.com/2019/06/amd-ryzen-5-3600-x570-review/

>still beta bios
>still unoptimal RAM
>still a flailing dickless incel coping that his ripoff gayme box is now obsolete

Attached: 1545818044079.png (1078x1304, 284K)

SIR DELID THIS, THE 3600 WAS SUPPOSED TO MURDER THE 9900K

I need 64gb of ram though.
That's gonna be pricey at 3700+MHz


I do not play video games, and have never gonna to /v/
Infinity fabric is directly related to ram speeds.
It's not complicated.
Slow 3200mhz ram won't cut it.

How can you copy to memory faster than you can write to memory? I must learn this technique.

Attached: kermit.jpg (221x246, 16K)

>press enter
>pause
>output

they say in the arcticle that its a bug and will be fixed upon launch. nice try tho faggot

TRUE LULW

>Have Threadripper 1950x
>Have 64GB of 2666 non-b die
>Highly suspect that this leads to latency

Attached: 1559983722.png (1000x1000, 426K)

there's no actual 3733MHz ram. You need to overclock it from a 3600 Stick. Also, CAS Latency is a better indicator of whether it'll work.

CAS 14 3200MHz will be the same as CAS 16 3600 MHz. I highly also suspect that the reason why the system in the benchmark Ran with the 83ns latency is precisely because it defaulted to it's JEDEC-approved speed, and that they were not able to tighten the timings, the same way they were not able to overclock.

You'll never frag Hinata with lag like that

incel BTFO

Attached: 3600.jpg (718x379, 133K)

>nanoseconds
its literally nothing

the greatest moments in sports and games come with handicaps.

>Michael Jordan's Flu game
>Willis Reed in 1970 Finals
>Tiger Woods during the 2008 US Open

So no-scoping an Incel with a "laggy" CPU is a better feat.

>They tested with X570
HERE WE GO.

>BIOS really was gimped.

The X470 had bad internal timings thanks to the Beta Bios.

FUCKING
DELETE
THIS
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>They finally tested with a x570 board
Its over bros...

Attached: 1533513120928.jpg (638x599, 123K)

Hope you got enough "percents" to catch up. You poor fool are going to be let down once again.

Attached: 1556295578434.png (898x882, 108K)

>he posted it again
lmaoing at your cope right now. imagine only having one benchmark to shill with

Attached: 1560581858708.png (1700x650, 152K)

>muh superior poo manufacturers

Attached: oy.jpg (2000x1123, 339K)

Attached: 1555209411222.png (2259x1372, 1.87M)

Ooohhh, Not have any charts to show me? Oh that's right.....

that's a memory latency measurement, not cache latency measurement

this is the thing.
People are going to spam that memory latency is 10ns slower and ignore the 100s of ways it's faster.

Synthetic cherrypicks are what the shill spammers are going to cling to, especially that one ban evader.

Attached: ban evading on the job.jpg (1440x582, 192K)

Huh, didn't know Jow Forums liked far cry new dawn so much. "Games are for children" user said but suddenly far cry matters? How suspicious.

Attached: 20190313_115755.jpg (2048x1152, 642K)

Attached: 1551867439199.png (396x408, 165K)

What's the latency on x570?

this
it's one whiny bitch who keeps posting the same graph over and over like it somehow means the game isn't poorly optimized shit

Show me any game besides dirt 4 that even comes close

Attached: 1555527390367.png (969x936, 82K)

>this one game counts but that other one? No, it doesn't!

Attached: 1448917281249.jpg (297x296, 39K)

Drones are notoriously bad about that.

>$200~ CPU performs slightly worse than a $500+ one
>intelfags think this is a win for them

Attached: ENDLESS TRASH.jpg (920x717, 79K)

Attached: 3900x.jpg (917x540, 172K)

a 3800x doesn't even beat a 9900k, what are you talking about?

why not use the same hardware? can't go head to head?

why did they use a dinky 2700?

i know you're a dumb faggot with more money than sense but i know you can read

5700xt isn't any better than 2070 on DirectX 11

Attached: tm.png (1335x597, 95K)

Must suck to be poor huh?

i'm buying a R9 3900x
have sex and stop larping

with that kind of performance gap, not really. Especially when for other tasks like maintaining your company, or making servers for your businesses, AMD is better.

Now keep crying to mommy about getting your GAYMING PC and your TREEPOL-EY GAYMES.

you're going to be so btfo you have no idea, i can't wait for the 7th to come soon enough

wasnt this the same site that posted some bullshit 2xxx ryzen benchmarks too?

Who is? I already am impressed with what the 3600 has been able to do.

It's practically the lowest-priced SKU as well as the lowest clocked.

>autists can't understand context
He clearly was talking about μA latency and not CAS latency

Unless you're coming from a 2500k, It's going to be pretty underwhelming

>el champuzas

> el chapuzas informatico

same here
can't wait for you to eat some of that humble pie
have sex already

>Unless you're coming from a 2500k
lmao this fucking retard thinks this isn't going to be overwhelmingly the case
goddamn why are you such a stupid faggot

How about you wait till the real thing is out and real benchmarks are done?

Drones are usually retarded spurges, I just like ribbin' them. i actually don't care whats faster

>I'M JUST PRETENDING TO BE RETARDED
sure thing bud

Attached: lil'uns.jpg (284x391, 22K)

>save $300 on CPU over 9900k
>have to spend $300 more on high speed ram and active cooled 16 phase VRM 15w TDP southbridge motherboard
>end up with equal multi thread performance but worse ST
>most games and programs optimised for intel over amd
>worse at emulation

Attached: fortnite compare.jpg (1920x1080, 617K)

not how it works and we've seen that but keep shitposting

>I can't stop shitposting to save my life

you could at least ask Intel to pay you for all your shitposting

I'm waiting on un-biased reviews, AMD has been know to exaggerate.

I would pay to piss you clowns off.

Bigger cache should compensate.

You mean paid intel shills lie and misrepresent what AMD says?

Just look at Steve from GN, blatantly distorting the facts because intel pays him too.

If anyone reading this ever wants unbiased facts then come join us on r/amd.

you're an obnoxious faggot and you're pretending like you're some enlightened holier than thou fucker when you're engaging in /v/-tier console war bullshit like a fucking child
get off your "I'M JUST TROLLING" high horse when it's clear you really believe the stupid shit you post

Attached: csgo.jpg (1280x720, 277K)

why do people keep posting 2700 and 2700x benchmarks
is it because they're not used to different generations actually having a power difference? oh dear

lol

>gaymes

Literally irrelevant. In real workloads ryzen 3000 will destroy any intel product on the market.

go on faggot
tell me more about how you're "just in it for the laughs" when you are here for literal hours reposting the exact photos

here's a (you)

Attached: Untitled.png (396x405, 182K)

Worse at emulation? Think again sweetie

gottem!

Attached: 2c9ba29b409183450f37e090f023f3f3.jpg (640x478, 81K)

some of us actually want to help others buy computer parts and aren't here for attention-seeking behaviour because their parents didn't love them enough
seek help, dilate, and have sex. in that order

>literally the same photos he resorted to last time he got btfo
come on dude, if you're going to spend all day every day crying about AMD, you may as well get some new pictures

Attached: 1512498277886.png (645x729, 99K)

seething lmao