MATE vs XFCE

Um, sweaty... Clementine and Strawberry are Qt.

ITT linux dress up incels

GNOME Flashback > MATE

MATE designed to stay lightweight, any bloat is comfyness allopwance to not-as-savvy-out-of-the-box users.
MATE is excellent for what it is. I use MATE on an older ThinkPad, it werks. I think it'll grow a user base in time.

Attached: 3d66c2ecea95dd7c280d54381981914d29342c59.jpg (3840x2160, 351K)

so what's your point?

Attached: Pi.png (1169x679, 443K)

does it takes less of laptop battery usage than mint???

ANSWER ME user

Xfce because of the nice logo

they're both garbage
mate has a shit panel in general and xfce takes 10 fucking years to release a major version like FIX THE FUCKING SCREENTEARING ALREADY NO I DON'T WANT TO USE COMPTON BECAUSE IT'S FUCKING GARBAGE

>GNOME Flashback > MATE
Ha. So they'e brought fallback back from the dead. And looks like OpenRC is supported again in 3.32. Maybe I'll give gnome 3 a chance again.