Why do Americans feel they *need* to own a tactical strategic assault weapon?

I never cared nor wanted one until the left wanted to ban them. Now I am saving my shekels.
>Why do I want one?
To trigger the limp dicked Europeans

>But are you seriously suggesting that your *desire* to own a lethal assault weapon equipped with armour-piercing rounds overrides the right of your compatriots to feel safe in public spaces?
Yes.

Attached: IMG_4605.jpg (1200x1600, 990K)

This is one of the most autistic posts I've read in a while, it seems like you let Jow Forums think for you all day.

because I want one

majority of gun related crime is committed with ilegal guns though

Because second amendment written in 18 century allowed fully automatic assault rifles and machine guns for some reason.

it doesn't say the right to keep and bear muskets bud

Yes just bend over and accept your fate, self defence is overrated meme :D

I like guns i want a decent semiautomatic rifle
, i can either build a basic bitch ar-15 for 600 dollarydoos or spend 800 on a ruger mini-14, shy would i pay more for a gun just to not have assault features?
Also
>folding stock
Doesn’t make the rifle more lethal,it makes it slightly more concealable but you still have to wear a greatcoat to hide it
>bayonet mount
why does anyone give a shot if i put a bayonet on my rifle
>flash supressor
Only on the list as an assault feature because someone felt threatened by it, does a gun having less muzzleflash make it more dangerous, and what if i want to shoot at night?
>high capacity magazine
you got me their more bullets is more leathal but you can just practice switching magaziness soo.
The word assault weapon is a meme, and AR-15s are popular because they are economical and a good design

>tactical strategic assault weapon
>a rifle
youtube.com/watch?v=AXzEcwYs8Eo

>armour piercings rounds
Most rifles are powerful enough to pierce body armor, not just ar-15s but hunting rifles too, most police body armour is only strong enough to stop pistols,

Because ARs are fucking awesome. You should try shooting one, sometime.

there was a court case in the late 18th century that said privately owned canons where legal, it was clearly meant to cover weapons of war since cannons were weapons of war and could be legally privately owned

But 5,56mm are peashooters and not fun

aren’t they prohibited in Canada?

Nope. At least not for now

Attached: 20180403_205226-1.jpg (1759x2843, 1.93M)

i think you are confusing leftists with liberals

this

RK 62 was very ebin :D very good :D

M240Bs are also ebin
very good

Attached: 3821D4D7-3A74-4DFE-9EE7-85D33C441461.jpg (960x1280, 227K)

I prefer freedom over security, yes