1. country

1. country
2. Who would you rather support? one of the few non-oil rich stable and developing mena countries or a bunch of desert bedouins with no history who will turn the territory into a failed state.

Attached: image.jpg (430x383, 135K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reguibat_tribe
gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b72002410
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>USA
Of course we support the Moroccan claims, it is the position of the goverment

who is whiter?

MOROCCO

the República Árabe Saharaui Democrática because they speak spanish

I always dreamed of doing some heist in the Netherlands and hide out in the western Sahara.

But in order to fullfil my dream, it needs to be a lawless failed state.

Based

West saharans are literal chimps compared to Moroccans and that's saying something

kys yourselves

Why of course I'll support the SaharaOUIs.

Viva los saharauis

sahrawis are moroccan

I also support Catalan and Basque independence so you get a pass

kys chicano

The pro Morocco ones are but the seperatists should be deported to Saudi arabia to live with their bedouin kin

I don't care as long as none of you come to Spain. You guys are literally flooding the country.

Attached: 34143.jpg (658x373, 138K)

Would rather die than support any of you honestly.

I support free Sahwari
Marocci piggus go home!!!

Attached: Screenshot_2018-03-20-23-22-40.png (720x1280, 715K)

It's called right of return :)

That's good

whatever option cuts the conflict really short and prevents Soros human trafficking setups.

But that's Tunisia.

Well there isn't much of a conflict since Morocco controls the region and it's basically defacto part of Morocco the only problem is a bunch of chimps residing in a refugee camp/rat nest in Algeria from which they wave sticks at us

this

then I support Algerian use of chemical weapons on the camp and a media blackout on the matter

that's a tunisian state baka

Morocco is our oldest ally so of course we would support you

Based

I don't even understand how those separatists are taken seriously by anybody. They control nothing and have zero legitimacy.

WTF I LOVE FRANCE NOW

They are nationalista for sawahiwi independence.

literally who cares

UN should bomb thr fuck out of morocco to check moroccan aggression.

Anything anti-Moroccan

Attached: Screenshot_2018-04-22-14-30-06.png (720x1280, 92K)

This, moroccans are terrorist sandniggers we need to invade to prevent terrorism.

>:^(

The Reich
What are you even doing there Maroccobro? Its a stain on your elswhise rather white vest in the west
Let them have there state and when it collaps you can march in for humanitary reasons and all would be fine

The Kingdom of Morocco is based
Shitrawi Repooblic is trash

you could make it Mauritania's problem by giving them the east side of the river.

Bad post, we support freedom and independence here, sawahri for sahwaris, moroccan monarchists go home!

Any American who doesn't fully support Morocco isn't a true American desu

Irl that's actually what I would rather see, people from the sahara have their living expenses subsidized and get free gibs from the government, they cost us almost $1 billion annually and we're already poor

Are the dessert Beduins also muslim?

Any american that supports muslims supports terrorism

MOROMIERDAS GO HOME

VIVA EL REINO SAHARAUI

Very true. when I see an american post that doesn't support Morocco I automatically shrug it off as a butthurt chicano

Muslims did 9/11 we need to invade morocco you anti american pussy.

Well yeah everything in Africa down to central africa is muslim except for a bit of west africa

well then GTFO there!
If those camel fuckers even join IS you can kill all of them and then take the land

Well I just hope you'll get all killed.

Western Sahara is the only answer.

1. Every good person supports Zidane
2. Zidane is of algerian origin
3. Algeria supports Western Sahara

Thus western sahara. It's only logical.

Unless you are not a good person.

western sahara

Bitch stay the fuck out of cunt with stable gouvernments!
Invade Mexico or some SA cunt FFS

Algeria is French

1. Zidane is kabylian
2. Some Kabylis want independence from Algeria
3. All Kabyles I know support Morocco and see sahrawis as leaches because Algeria spends money on them in its camps

Muslim terrorist.

no, they need to inavde more mena countries so europe gets fucked :3

if you take in every refugee I'm okay with that. I don#t want any more in my cunt

Sahwaris support democracy republic and freedom moroccans are anti freedom and are a dictatorship.

>my country
>german flag
That will never stop being disgusting. I need to die as painful as possible.

>a bunch of desert bedouins with no history
They've as much history as the rest of moroccan regions if not more.

>territory into a failed state.
Like morocco the 4th world country?

Morocco 35,3 mil people
Western Sahara 0,5mil people

just move million of your loitering poor people to live along the river and suddenly it's definitely Morocco, by dumbocratic standards.

Mexico is basicly controlled by drug cartells why don't you go back to the childrens table sweety?

The real redpill is that Morocco as a whole is a sahrawi sanhaja rightfull clay.

Attached: 45533-5e1bf6fb809a24489aed1532d5e2a2337bb5831a-story_inline_image.jpg (1950x1100, 223K)

Why is it only the "stable" north african countries like Morocco, Tunisia, and Algeria which are the home countries of most of the european terrorists?

Genuine question, I would have expected a lot more from Afghan/Iraq considering they've experienced international wars even more directly

I would love pic related as flag as well Kamerad

Attached: 2000px-War_Ensign_of_Germany_(1892-1903).svg.png (2000x1200, 183K)

europe is only allowed to exist by america's grace otherwise you would be russia's bitch ;3

Morocco actually has heritage sites and monuments and even famous travellers and writers, what do the sahrawis have?
If Morocco is a fourth world country an independent west sahara would be a 99th world country since they wouldn't even have anything to eat or drink if Morocco stops sending it to them

Algerians can apply for french passport quiet easilie. Opportunity makes thievs

>Moor-occo is not legal heir of Moor Empire
I guess by that logic, Germany is the true Carolingian Emperor

>That was true 80 years ago
Anything more recent?

Sanhaja are berber and Morocco is berber so it has more right to claim that territory than sahrawi a*ape bedouins

Saudi princes have an easier time operating in functioning countries.

By the grace of the immortal finnish hyper emperor, WE WUZ KARLING AND SHIIIEETTT

Morocco is a dictatorship, we need to bring freedom to morocco, OPERATION MOROCCAN FREEDOM AMERICA!!!!

>Shirawis
>Sanhaja
Pick one

The "sahrawi" (fake nationality, as much as Morocco or Algeria btw) have more history per capita than most of the Atlas, Anti Atlas and rest of moroccan tribes. They always played an important role in the trans saharian economy and war, and were important to several medieval dynasties.

The reguibats are among the mightest berber warriors.

anyway making a difference between saharawi and the rest of the maghreb or morocco is compltely autistic. It's the same people.

This whole territory should be like pic related, Morocco in dark green (basically 1/5 of modern day morocco), and the rest being tribes.

Attached: 1894marocTRZ.jpg (640x645, 70K)

>Reguibat
>Not sanhaja
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reguibat_tribe

Morocco should be like it was in 1894 before France with the tekna/reguibat controlling western sahara, and 80% of morocco in little republics independant from any king.

>its the same people
Just like swedes are Italians?
Layoune is 1300 km from fes

Attached: Screenshot_2018-04-22-14-57-06.png (720x1280, 120K)

This is what north africa should looks like, like it was 5 centuries ago. Circa 1500 ad.

Prove me wrong.

Attached: 1500big.jpg (1203x960, 285K)

By your logic the countries on the american continent shouldn't be countries anymore since 300 years ago they were just a bunch of native american tribes and all of africa should stop having borders and countries because before colonialism it was a free for all

>300 years ago they were just a bunch of native american tribes
>Moroccan education

Why just north africa? why not the whole world go back to tribalism?

French are indo euro
So french are germans.

Attached: Screenshot_2018-04-22-14-59-44.png (720x1280, 193K)

My main point was going to be about the 13 american colonies then I expanded it to include all of america and the american continent and didn't care enough to correct the date

If the world was fair the european would get kicked ou of America yeah. Just like the pied noirs got kicked out.

Morocco in this current borders never existed (same with Algeria) and it makes no historical sense for it to exist that way.

Because tribal identities in most of Europe got removed like 2000 years ago, while maghreb was very tribal until a century ago, tribal maghreb existed for 5000 years and make more sense than some made up countries that are 50 years old.

I would gladly divide Algeria into the historical 516 tribes gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b72002410
same with morocco

Attached: marocclic.png (787x787, 122K)

I wouldn't because tribalism is retarded so go ahead and do it to your country not mine

>get kicked out of land we were born in
???

He is dumb
More news at 11

You know just because it's divided into tribes doesn't mean it can't be united under a supra state.

Pic related, the almohad system that united all the tribes from libya to iberia.
It was when the maghreb wasn't a 3rd world irrelevant shithole by an economical, scientific and military super power.

Attached: supra.png (1588x1508, 241K)

>I love getting ruled by a literal half nigger mulatto king!

Enjoy living in that third world shithole bro.

Attached: e113b2565d6c74ef636a3eb8c94b47.jpg (699x410, 43K)

How is that any different than what we have now? various people joined by allegiance to a single state.

I don't love it but it sure beats the other option

>united tribes
It ruled over tribes not united.