You don't need a gun!

>you don't need a gun!

Attached: 1524002824891.png (1217x1015, 708K)

>only the police, and military should have guns

Attached: 1523343337720.png (474x711, 90K)

pretty much, guns make no sense in society
having them versus not having them doesn't make any difference

>tfw ywn concealed carry a gun as long as you live in cuckanada
>tfw the AR-15 will become prohibited in my lifetime
fuck this gay country, I should move to Montana

Attached: first.jpg (540x330, 40K)

>America won the Revolutionary war so I can defeat the US military with my ar15

Attached: 1524350517033.png (960x540, 279K)

please do

Great. Want me to help you pack faggot?

Attached: 232.jpg (225x225, 7K)

Move to japan if you hate guns

wish I could be a trap but I don't want to sacrifice my otherwise normal life

They should move to Israel instead.

>move to japan if you hate guns
>previously suggesting that canada hates guns

Attached: 1515590303485.jpg (1250x1000, 525K)

Feels bretty bad dude. At least scheer will improve our situation

>Not realizing the government hates guns and gun owners

Attached: 1522701977741.jpg (942x872, 111K)

Im not OP

>it's the bill of rights not the bill of needs

Attached: smugwojak.jpg (633x758, 56K)

this hahahah

Attached: 1524174127704.jpg (485x481, 39K)

>successive Canadian governments have regulated firearms
>the government is illegitimate because i hate Trudeau

Attached: 1.png (130x157, 56K)

wew

the us military can't even handle chinks in the jungle or poor arabs

this t b h

Attached: 1491670330235.png (900x762, 270K)

>Vietnamese didn't have SAM, Fighter jets, tanks supplied by China and the soviet union
>The Mujahideen and later al qaeda didn't have Iraqi, Afghani and CIA weapons obtained during the Soviet War in Afghanistan (stinger missiles)

Attached: 1514373111433s.jpg (221x250, 6K)

Too many leafs itt
Someone get the rake

They're all albertans, not real canadians

This but unironically. The only people who dislike gun ownership, are the people who are the most uninformed

>Too many leafs itt
>Someone get the rake

Attached: eXaq3pNtR1sl3FTTRxu4vyTBfIj6Hu9zZYpBPeTB8gE.png (500x583, 100K)

fuck, are we that obvious?

Attached: bc.jpg (396x766, 47K)

Im from BC, and shill for guns

>BC
>Real Canadians
nice try, chang.
Also build the fucking pipeline

Its us vs the East. No room for western fighting. I agree on the pipeline

You're right, we should rally Saskatchewan, Manitoba and then fight a two front war against Vancouver and the east.

>I can defeat the US military with my ar15

You don't need an ar15 for that, just some IEDs and a kalashnikov

>kalashnikovs

Attached: 12312.png (275x183, 6K)

>the government and military shouldn't be allowed to have any weapon that a citizen can't

Attached: 1498553942860.jpg (637x692, 77K)

>implying that the american revolutionaries wouldn't be supported by russia and China
>not knowing that the revolutionary war was a proto proxy war between France, Spain and Great Britain

>Everyone should have military-grade weapons to defend themselves

Attached: 1521416376715.png (642x729, 145K)

>AR 15's are military grade weapons

Attached: 1523995595627.jpg (900x900, 83K)

>AR 15's are military grade weapons

Attached: 1462421853964.png (368x376, 4K)

>russia and china would support a bunch of hicks on trucks

Attached: 1524448889591.gif (500x382, 125K)

correct
correct

>weapons developed for the military aren't military grade weapons

Attached: 1515803989905.png (1170x840, 42K)

Why wouldn't they?

>At least scheer will improve our situation

What level of brain damage makes a person say these things and unironically believe them?

AR 15s were developed as civillian sporting rifles, as they lack the select fire feature, that defines the M16 and M4. They wouldn't be sold to civillians if they were military rifles

Civilian AR15 is a neutered semi-auto version of the AR15 that the US adopted as the M16. Literally apples and oranges

>If I remove the treads from an Abrams that means tanks aren't made for the military.

>I trust my government to protect me

Attached: 1523989130401.jpg (1367x1692, 133K)

>the AR-15 was designed for the military

Attached: revolution.jpg (324x1296, 216K)

>why would china and russia not want to engage in a nuclear exchange with the United States

>the united states government wouldn't use nuclear weapons to defend its existance

Attached: 46a.png (645x729, 97K)

Americans pretending to be retarded is my least favourite meme

Attached: suffer.jpg (900x900, 196K)

His policy seems to be somewhat decent to gun owners in Canada. I can't say I trust politicians, but its better than any liberal, or NDP gun policy

>The US government can tax a nuclear wasteland

Attached: 1476150069833.jpg (500x747, 134K)

>something is too lethal for civilians to own because it was produced for the military at one point
Can i have one of these? Never used by any military except for testing

Attached: 1EDFE51C-73A8-4C4A-9AE0-906F1AC20958.jpg (1522x839, 494K)

>gorllionaires need tax money

Attached: 1524454852363.png (623x450, 36K)

A tank with no tread is still a tank. An AR-15 is a completely different rifle from the military variant, with respect to the internal components. If you knew anything about guns, you would know that.

I see nothing wrong with this

Attached: 43CFDAB0-7853-4B88-A611-04575C8B4294.jpg (2048x1011, 1.35M)

>government could function with out anyone to tax cause muh millionaires
go look at the richest man the im the world and then look at the operating budge for the federal government for one year, i bet the richestman has nothing left after 5 years tops

>the united states government would use nuclear weapons to defend its existance

Attached: 1521501401810.png (645x729, 58K)

>nuclear war will kill everyone

Attached: pqafkb6d9ba01.jpg (645x729, 49K)

Why stop at fully automatic firearms? Private citizens should be allowed to own and detonate nuclear weapons

>ONLY THE POLICE, FBI AND MILITARY SHOUKD HAVE GUNS

>OMG POLICE OFFICERS KEEP KILLING BLACK PEOPLE, DIS HAVE TO STOPS

Attached: d90.png (644x800, 15K)

>small arms are comparable to nukes

>If you can own X then why not own Y

Literal lefty talking point. Kys Kyle Kelinski

>full auto is easy to get in the usa
Lol i wish

But I'm being serious

Attached: 1522951240079.png (872x750, 722K)

>I need a gun in a country with 0 violent crime.

Attached: 1514231212486.png (500x515, 44K)

So do I.

Attached: 1523069576737.jpg (1092x747, 203K)

>nuclear retaliation wouldn't escalate to the point where the planet is uninhabitable

Attached: 1487575086383.png (601x508, 127K)

Full auto is inaccurate.

>B-but muh finger get sore after repetitive trigger pulling

Man up soyboy, more likely to kill government troops with a semi auto than a full.

> full auto is easy to get in America
I wish desu

Attached: ADF24413-081A-471E-B12A-A6498C943756.jpg (1224x792, 287K)

>we need guns to stand against evil government!
>government would just drone you

>Implying they would have enough drones to bomb every single gun owner

Imagine being clinically retarded

Attached: o7jYMo2_d.jpg (221x250, 5K)

>civilians should be given guns to kill police officers if they step out of bounds

Attached: 1507483926815.png (406x452, 30K)

Better to have it, and not need it, than need it, and not have it. Plus guns, are fun to shoot in general

Attached: maxresdefault (3).jpg (1004x774, 206K)

>Implying that's what I said

Attached: 1519605480210s.jpg (250x247, 8K)

just bamboo poo steaks

Fucking love brainlet wojaks keep them coming :]

why would you need a fucking gun in a peaceful country you dumbass??
the may problem you yanks have is the massive shooting made by virgin teens, without guns that will be gone.

i understand having guns in a shit like mexico, brazil, colombia etc.. but why in USA?
Just to hunt innocent animals?? if thats the reason you amerifats are even more stupid than i used to believe.

Attached: 0e9.jpg (600x600, 27K)

>US government only has drones in its multi trillion dollar arsenal
>civilians only have shitty rifles from the 20th century

>Without guns that would be gone

Yet Mexico is a utopia run by drug cartels with guns LMAO

>why would you need a fucking gun in a peaceful country you dumbass??
When the country turns non-peaceful

>implying you said anything of note

Attached: AhFp5OF.png (733x406, 128K)

>Implying that the U.S gov has enough men, tanks, jets, drones and helicopters to defeat armed White Americans

Fucking leaf, your country should be range banned

white privilege

>I am Canadian and I know it all

Attached: 1524457534432.png (760x848, 277K)

>government policy should be guided by wildly imaginary scenarios

Attached: 1512330650860.png (900x729, 129K)

And once again, I refer you to almost every guerilla conflict ever fought. Please fuck off back to /leftypol/.

some parts of america are not safe

Mass shootings are a minority of all gun deaths

Hunting gets you meat and is cool

>"blargghhh ooough"

Attached: images.png (211x239, 6K)

>GUN OWNERS CANT DEFEAT THE JEWNITED SNAKES GOVERNMENT

>Jewnited Snakes lost against Vietnamese farmers

Attached: 1524457595101.png (892x722, 185K)

da, comrade. the US is veri veri wiik. can't even handle manlet chink farmers or oily araps kha kha kha. totally was not wars of attrition aimed to weaken rasha and satisfy the military-industrial jew.

can confirm with proofs, because that's what it says on realnye-novosti.ru, so it must be tru

also, rossiya akbar. greetings from the russian ministry of truth.

Attached: 1495409447707.png (597x396, 354K)

>almost every guerrilla conflict
>where american force just drones terrorists to solve everything

learn to fucking read pls...
i clearly called my shitty country shitty.
nobody is saying the opposite you moron.

>Guerilla wars have been won in the past century without any foreign help
>foreign countries want to risk a nuclear exchange with the US government because a bunch of hicks want guns

Attached: 1516813953596.png (645x773, 87K)

America lost against the Viet Cong you fucking idiot. You must be an idiot to claim they could even defeat an armed population.

Your fucking drones and jets can't even defeat the terrorist group you created to defeat a terrorist group to defeat a terrorist group.

>vietnamese farmers fought alone without massive technical and material support from china and the soviet union

Attached: cFRDcC1jVrLJqgFEkx46cs0eZEGd3SOD-ShqOMqQqWU.png (320x256, 45K)

ayo dawg did i hear you talk about inception shit

Attached: 1510854564132.jpg (352x346, 36K)

Firearms are often used for protection. I can't understand why lefties want to deprive the primary means of self preservation, and protection from the populace. Self defense is a right all humans should have at birth, and a gun is the most efficient way to defend yourself.

>Implying that the Viet Cong had Soviets and Chinks on the battlefield

>"BLARGHHH GURRR ZRAHHHH"

Attached: North_Vietnamese_Antiaircraft_Weapons.jpg (774x1209, 554K)

Or, you can argue this way: only a soyboy would need a gun, for if you had a threatening look, nobody would fuck with you for you to need to use your gun.