Fuck

Fuck...

Attached: Screenshot (248).png (1366x768, 1.88M)

>1942
>Not moving on to Hearts of Iron 4
Kys

>trying to play on these dates with EUIV
play victoria 2 or HOIIV. man EUIV is the worst at simulating later dates

>HOI 4
No you kys

>playing GOY4
you should kys too

proof that italy did all the work in WW2

I just like the way EU4 plays honestly. Don't much care about the simulation aspect.

people like you have ruined this genre

Go back to Civ

why the fuck do you get so pissy about what I said?

How autistic are you

SHUT UP AAAAAAAHHHHHHH

VERY, now stop killing the things I like

>not just playing eu4 but playing it more than necessary to convert a save to v2
Actually die.

I just love wrecking ussr in hoi4, rate my division composition.

2 anti tank, 2 art, 1 med tank rest inf 40 width
I also have 24 tank divisions of around 10 med tanks and rest motorized
Soviet union fell

Attached: Screenshot_2018-04-16-02-06-58.png (720x1280, 921K)

>playing HoI4
>playing Germany
>playing Germany in HoI4

Have you even beaten hoi4?

They just need to add more interwar options and seperate paths than immidiate world war

EU4 pisses me off with their overextension bullshit. This is not even historically accurate.
Alexander the great conquered whole persia after one campaign and in EU4 you can only annex like 3-4 provinces per war and even for that you have to ouccupy the entire country first.

brainlet

his empire fell apart after his death
he was quite literally overextended

Brainlet

His empire didnt fell, to was split between generals the successors.

>divided
so it didn't exist then? sounds like it fell to me

yeah it makes total fucking sense to only keep 10% of russia after lieterally going all the way to siberia.

Overextension is a realistic concept for this time and its not harsh enough in EU4. But yeah, war score is handled pretty dumb.
Eu4 military/conquest is heavily simplified and too easy so the game becomes unrealistic in these aspects

if you conquered the land you occupied you'd become an unstoppable blob before 1500
accually impirum universalis which is a mod which goes from about classical to post imperial times small countries have an invasion cb on huge empires where they conquer and core the entire thing.

CK2 is the best one though

It was still ruled by alexanders ppl

it wasn't a contiguous empire like when Alexander ruled it
the eu4 equivalent is several rebels rising up and splitting the country into pieces

Every single aspect of eu4 is over simplified to the max and made to take forever while being as boring as possible.

This, el mana game, i have thousands of hours played cant be bothers to boot it up.

What really bothers me is the lack of a real anti-blob mechanics rather then the easily avoided and never relevant to ai stuff.
A big empire should eventually fall pray to internal divisions and part of being a blob should be having to manage those.

Okay alex is not good exampke but what about the roman conqust of gaul?
Romans conquered gaul in one single war.

Attached: download (19).jpg (172x164, 3K)

If you have high unrest you will get that

not true

Attached: Roman_Republic_Empire_map.gif (626x595, 101K)

How can you be so ignorant of Roman history that you actually believe this?

I knew I was arguing with a mega brainlet
the modern paradox audience

Attached: Screenshot_2018-04-24-03-16-09.png (720x1280, 190K)

>Magyar trying to dissuade conquest
traitor

this

rape and pillage not conquest, stupid inmate

All that DLC tho

>not pirating it
Maybe you could afford food if you weren't an idiot

CK2 had great premise but i hate the direction it took with the DLCs

Yarr harr

What cuntry to play next in EU4, getting bored with late game Spen.
I was thinking doing some achievement hunting either:
>reform the Golden Horde/unite tatar cultures one
>Prestor John as Ethiopia
>that Freddie Mercury one (own North Konkan as Kilwa.)

Attached: Spain.png (1902x1064, 3.73M)

answer the call of the steppe brother, ride again

Attached: Byzantine Feels.png (1062x764, 1.27M)

enjoy it immensely, but it gets so laggy after 150 or so years

what the fuck are those achievements paradox

That's the theory, but as a player it's way too easy to avoid it.
You can perpetually expand with little fear of breaking so long as you follow a formalistic pattern.
>take less then 100% overexpand
>increase autonomy
>core
>convert
and blammo, that land will never again cause you problems, all that in ~20 years or so

Attached: 1506850819776.jpg (276x280, 24K)

you can skip the autonomy increase and play wack a mole with rebels, once each time, then blob even harder because the disaster for 30+% authonomy wont fire

you can't really have any interesting and organic anti-blob mechanics without simulating the internal power structures of the empire

>playing hoi4
pleb

do most germans think like this?
i mean it would explain why you guys lost ww2

I used to love EU4. Now it's just a bloated mess. Stellaris was kind of ruined by the last update too.

CK2 is the only decent game left now...

Aztecs, opm native Americans on the east coast but be warned they include a lot of waiting on max speed after you dominate the neighbors and wait for Europeans