You wake up in Afghanistan before it went to shit

You wake up in Afghanistan before it went to shit

Attached: afghanistan-1960-bill-podlich-photography-112__880.jpg (880x625, 193K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amanullah_Khan
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodesian_Bush_War
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I don't get it, all I see is socialist terror, unlike modern day, liberated Afghanistan

Was Afghanistan ever not shit? I though they have been at war since the beginning of time.

Get my ass to the soviet union as fast as I can

It was doing okay before the cia started funding terrorists. Would've turned out like central Asian countries had the soviets not been driven out.

what do you mean by "doing okay?" what was it that they were doing that was okay?

This is unironically why we need feminism.

Attached: women-in-afghanistan-before-and-after-taliban.jpg (501x254, 51K)

why do they look so wh*Te in that pic?

both iran and afghanistan are aryan

islam has caused a lot of damage, they're what europeans future look like

That was a tourist, the pic was from an album by an european who visited the country in the 60s

they had all of the dumb villagers in their villages
kabul was for landowners

one on the right is there with bill podlich

Leaders were pushing for reforms. Education, women's rights yada yada

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amanullah_Khan

You know that those pictures are only of the richer parts? Afghanistan still had a female literacy of below 25% before it went to shit. Granted it was better, still no second world tier country like Iran. In fact they viewed Iran as some great modern country

Most of so-called "shitholes" were pretty good before some crazy rebels, appeared out of nowhere, have been started liberating.

Attached: Mogadishu-Somalia.png (1023x682, 946K)

unironically it's the US and USSR fault

Most of these rebels were funded by one of us

>I though they have been at war since the beginning of time.
They lay at a crossroads that must be held to dominate specific geographical regions. They necessarily get stomped by larger powers during large conflicts. They do have their in-between times, though.

I don't know any oppositionist's power in the world, which were backed by Soviet Union.

i think he was being sarcastic

Yeah and we have outside sources funding all sorts of shit to ruin us here.
If you fall to CIA covert operations, your country wasn't doing very well and would have fallen militarily to some other actors, which is why we were trying to get to it first.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodesian_Bush_War

The guys who shot the Americans that were trying to deliver food and aid during the early 90's were trained by soviets fyi
That's always how it was. US goes into fight, soviets arm and supply their enemies. USSR goes into fight, US trains and supplies their enemies. Neither go into fight, they train and arm whatever side promises to be loyal to them.
USSR was very involved in Africa and Latin America, as well as everywhere else but to a lesser extent.

It was going in the right direction though. Leadership was trying to modernize the country. It would have been far better than it is today.

Socialist Afghanistan was kino.

Socalism>Fundamentalism

No Brad, just you.

Dick.

>everywhere the U.S. intervened turned into a massive shithole
>everywhere the Soviet union intervened is at least semi-decent today

Hmmm

Admittedly Soviet Socialism seemed to do a much better job of getting fundamentalist third world shitholes out of the stone age mentality and somewhat modernizing the country.

That's Lebanon.