Can we at least agree that the Roman alphabet is vastly superior to the Cyrillic alphabet...

Lack of contact with latin peoples; exarcebated by the fact that west rome got btfo by the time bulgarians settled. They were the first 'slavs' to be christianized (and thus, civilized). That was done by greeks who also created an alphabet for them which eventually spread to other slavs. Unsure why they didn't simply adopt greek script, however.

>t. Grzegorz Brzęczyszczykiewicz

No? Hanzi (chinese writing system) is utter inefficient trash in constant need of simplification

Cyrillic is superior for Slavic language. It was created specifically for it.
Reading polish nonsense in Latin is just cringy.

>It doesn't feet their language too
The Latin alphabet fits English because of French influence. See: cactusworldwide.com/blog/2012/11/15/the-influence-of-french-on-the-english-language/
>The pronunciation of English changed to some extent under the influence of French, as did the spelling. For example, the Old English spellings cw, sc and c became qu, sh and ch, so we now write queen rather than cwen, ship rather than scip, and should rather than scolde.

No, Bulgarians and Rus' were aligned with Greeks.

Polish cyrylic script just replaces latin characters with cyrylic ones, what's the difference? Literally the only difference would be that sz or cz have been written with letters instead of diagraphs.

no way anglo sounds fit latin alphabet, you are delusional bro, you never know how to pronounce written words

My last name is Russian(ends with -ow/ov) but I understand why some people might be terrified by Polish last names or words in general. Our country of origin plays huge role when it comes to language learning, for example: I am learning Russian and Finnish at the same time, and when I find Russian quite easy language to learn, cause it comes from the same language family as Polish, learning Finnish is like trying to understand Elvis language from LotR. All words look similar to me and I bet if I started to make up words like "pimpikokaikkao" some of them would be actual words in Finnish language.

>mfw there are ppl who didnt know how to write after 1000AD

Attached: beadini.png (247x265, 73K)

English works more like chinese runes rather than phonetic script.

There are people who don't know still.

>Greeks invented their script and setted the roots for civilization in Europe
>Italic tribes had huge contact and influence from them
>they became even bigger, made the Mediterranean and Europe what it is today
>Rome fell because n*rdoid refugees
>barbarians settled with Latin language
>Greeks somehow managed to stay stable but even bigger negroid subhumans settled in Europe to this days: the Slavs
>they somehow tried to civilize and unify them, just as they did with the Italics
>It did not happen, Slavs are genetic trash and can not even be compared to Mediterraneans
>meanwhile Germanics adapted civilization and somehow semi-civilized the Western Slavs
>the Slavic 3rd world mongrel shitholes do still exist to this day
>all of Europe in shame for such idiotic creatures, from every Germanic to Southern European country

>pope uses latin---latin alphabet no good
It's just what happened; we were in the byzantines' cultural sphere. There wasn't any ulterior motive for it.

Attached: file.png (902x313, 121K)

i don't think there was a need for something more complicated than symbols.

that explains a lot about slavs

t. wolga """"""""""""german""""""""""""""""""""

'''''''Russians''''''''''' Germans are semi-mongoloid niggers that came to Germany for the gibs in the 90's
Slavs are NOT different to the hordes of Arabic and Turkish sandniggers living in modern Europe, they were not meant to coexist with Germanics and Meds

About everyone except japs and chinks

history was told from generation to generation and laws were commonly known because of the family-like small societies. Every information could be just carried by someone with horse. Also the verbs for "to write" and "to read" are the same in all slavic languages, so the concept of reading and writing must be at least 1500 years old, because they were know our common ancestors. It just seem that the usage of symbols was complicated enough to percive it as an equal concept to phonetic script adopted together with christianity.

>by the time bulgarians settled
You mean Bulgars.

>They were the first 'slavs' to be christianized (and thus, civilized)
It was done by choice though. The Pope and the Patriarch of Constantinople anathematized each other as a result.

>That was done by greeks who also created an alphabet for them which eventually spread to other slavs
The Cyrilic script was created and spread under the protection of Boris, and no it wasn't by done Cyril and Methodius which were already dead at the time.

>Unsure why they didn't simply adopt greek script, however.
Because Bulgaria was big enough to rival Byzantium, adopting Greek would have meant instant death of Boris or whoever the ruler was. The bulgarian aristocracy was extremelly vicious, not to mention the Christianization itself met also big resistance.

reminder than W and K aren't in the original latin language, and were made for the sub-human barbarian tongues that had subhuman sounds in them

Attached: latin-alphabet10.gif (556x253, 7K)

>My last name is Russian(ends with -ow/ov)

You have to go back

The use of the Latin alphabet in Irish is neat

>My last name is Russian(ends with -ow/ov
Not necessarily Russian, though.

Don't mind him, this is really what they teach us at school. I was really surprised when I understood that Cyrillic wasn't created by Cyril and Methodius and that it's solely Bulgarian invention. Also school teachers never tell us that Church-Slavonic which was used in medieval Rus as a nobility language is actually proto-Bulgarian. And it's not because they lie, they are really uneducated retards themselves.

Not czekh at least. Good.

>>Greeks invented their script
They didn't. They mostly copied phoenicians who copied proto-sinaitic.

We did invent vowels though

Greeks had their own alphabet you arab subhuman.
They just used the Phoenician one because it was better suited for their language.

This was their piece of shit "alphabet"

Attached: canaanitealph.gif (507x647, 13K)

This madness has to stop sometime though, right Iki? I mean you must be getting bored at this point!

>pimpikokaikkao
Never say that to finn, remember.
Never!

no
i put arabs and slavs back to their place with pleasure
two kinds of useless shit people who harmed humanity much more than they improved it

What's your stance on Cumans though?

Larping in forums will get boring once you reach 18 years of age kelly

Yeah, hence why I said "mostly".

Shut up, ikibey.

>not carving out posts in ogham

Everything that comes from the Asiatic steppes is bad.

>You mean Bulgars

The Bulgars were Turkic semi-nomadic warrior tribes that settles in the Pontic-Caspian steppe and the Volga region during the 7th century.
The Bulgars spoke a Turkic language, i.e. Bulgar language of Oghuric branch.

>It was done by choice though.

In exchange for Bulgaria's conversion, the Byzantines returned previously conquered lands.

>The Pope and the Patriarch of Constantinople anathematized each other as a result.

No, they did not, that happened two centuries after and for different reasons, the had only a strife for the control of the region, neither the recognition of the Catholic Church or the diplomatic missions stopped, Liutprand of Cremona, an Italian diplomat and an important source for the politics of the 10th century Byzantine court was sent a century after.

>The Cyrilic script was created and spread under the protection of Boris, and no it wasn't by done Cyril and Methodius which were already dead at the time

Cyrillic is derived from the Greek uncial script, augmented by letters from the older Glagolitic alphabet, including some ligatures. These additional letters were used for Old Church Slavonic sounds not found in Greek.
The Glagolitic alphabet, was created earlier on by Saints Cyril and Methodius.
Modern scholars believe that Cyrillic was developed and formalized by early disciples of Cyril and Methodius.

>Because Bulgaria was big enough to rival Byzantium
I suggest you to read these ones, the entirety of early Slavonic literature was based upon Greek literal tradition and manuscripts. The Greek script simply did not fit with the language.
brepols.net/Pages/ShowProduct.aspx?prod_id=IS-9782503551739-1
brepols.net/Pages/ShowProduct.aspx?prod_id=IS-9782503556017-1

neither was J or Y

>Yeah, hence why I said "mostly".
No You said;
>They didn't. They mostly copied phoenicians who copied proto-sinaitic.

The Greek script is considered a unique alphabet because it had a letter to sound system, including vowels, also there are unique letters to the script not found in Phoenician , stress placed on words and an upercase and lowercase system not seen in proto-sinaitic, though the two latter were developed during the Hellenistic Period.

the J was a variant of the i
the Y comes from greek just like the K afaik

>No You said;
>>They didn't. They mostly copied phoenicians who copied proto-sinaitic.

>They MOSTLY copied

>also there are unique letters to the script not found in Phoenician
This is true and I didn't say anything against that though.

>born in Chrząszczyżewoszyce powiat Łękołody

Copied instead of altering is hugely different, the didn't take the Phoenician script intact; I am not denying your statement, i cited it in order to place a counter argument.

is french really still an official language in morocco and algeria?

Oh my bad for the incorrect usage of "copied" then desu.

French has no official status in Morocco, Tunisia or Algeria, but it is used in official documents in Morocco and as the language of higher education in all three. Tunisia and Morocco are also full members of the Francophonie, but Algeria decided not to join for obvious political reasons.

Cyrillic is a slight variation of latin, it has all the advantages of it.
What do you think of greek then?

Attached: 0_12a7fe_99d0856e_orig.png (1221x892, 1.14M)