Dating in America is suffering. All the single women are fat or have kids and all the qts are taken

wow. they weight more than me.

This table shows BMI which isn't great for individuals, but works for large populations.

Attached: file.png (1118x919, 292K)

That BMI is surprisingly low given their weights. I assumed women were supposed to have those BMIs.

>American women are both heavier and shorter than me
How does that even work?

Attached: [Yuzuki] Uchiage Hanabi, Shita kara Miru ka？ Yoko kara Miru ka？ (BD 1280x720 x264 10bit AACx2).m (1280x720, 123K)

This is an average American woman (27 years old) and her child.

Attached: American bottle feeding.jpg (836x596, 109K)

>tfw 6'2
>tfw 185lb
>tfw 30" waist
Skeleton pride worldwide

Attached: 1525672977947.png (225x225, 8K)

Isn't there a possibility that the Mexicans are skewing the stats? I've heard that there are plenty of fat Mexicans.

it's the dumb conservative southerners/midwesterners, actually

Attached: obesity vs trump states.png (864x864, 89K)

Oh. Sorry for assuming it was the Mexicans, then. Hopefully nobody feels insulted.

What a fucking shitty graph.
Am I supposed to infer the y axis based on my knowledge of how conservative the states are?

It tells you how conservative the states are, retard.

I often see women my age with little niglets

No it doesn't. It tells me there's a clinton-trump vote difference, which can be let's say 20% or -30%. Does -30% mean that more people voted for Clinton or Trump?
Of course, it's clear because I can see from the names of the states, but if I need to have that kind of apriori knowledge to read the graph, then it's a really fucking shitty graph.

you have to slay some dragons to get to the princess

Honestly I agree it's a shitty graph, x axis isn't labeled as bmi/obesity rate or w/e. Still if you're aware of American politics it's not too hard to infer.

Attached: twotypes.jpg (500x500, 47K)

Nvm, I'm blind, you're just drunk Dimitri

I think it's you who'd drank a shot of tequila too many Paco.

>tfw 28" waist

>The average American is a full foot shorter than me and weighs 5 more pounds

Scary desu

"Trump - Clinton vote difference"
>>what does this mean????

Attached: file.png (200x300, 22K)

>Dating in America is suffering. All the single women are fat
Are you fat? Be honest.
If you're fat or ugly, why do you think you deserve a slim/attractive GF?

>x axis isn't labeled
Are you blind, retarded, or trolling? How obvious does it need to be?

Attached: file.png (900x864, 258K)

>dumb
obesity is correlated with economics, not intelligence you numbnut. the fact that West Virginia, one of the most poverty-stricken states, is in the top right should tell you that

poor people work multiple jobs and have no time to cook, so they feed their family junk food and fast food. rich people can afford to shop at trader joe's and get organic/fresh food, and go to quality restaurants.

this is like obesity 101 and socioeconomics 101, do you even know anything?

Attached: file.png (2311x1465, 928K)

>162 cm
>no tits
>80 kg of pure lard

Attached: 1524520797787.jpg (400x400, 73K)

>lets copy that binary joke
>jolly good idea
you pic sucks

Again, if the number on the y axis is 30%... what does that mean, did more people vote for Trump or for Hillary.
Mind you, for a graph to be clear, you have to know this without looking at the actual grah i.e. the states and figuring out that because you've previously known some countries voted for Trump, a clear graph would make it clear by actually stating this on the axis itself.

Trump - (minus) Hillary
How is this hard to understand? Don't you have elections in Slovenia?

>talking out of your ass about things you know nothing about
low intelligence increases the likelihood of obesity
low intelligence also increases the likelihood of being poor
that doesn't mean being poor increases your chance of being obese. it means low intelligence causes both.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25102406
>Results from the analyses of high-quality, population-based, prospectively longitudinal data firmly establish that low intelligence increases the chances of obesity.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3813310/
> Children with lower IQ scores were more likely to become obese over the following 3 decades; a 15-point (1 standard deviation) difference in IQ between children predicted a 27% difference in their hazard of becoming obese
>This association was not fully explained by the children's developmental predisposition to obesity (adjusted RR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.82), socioeconomic characteristics of the households in which the children grew up (adjusted RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.61), children's family histories of obesity (adjusted RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.65), or adjustment for all of these risk factors (adjusted RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.70).
etc

Attached: kwt13502.jpg (667x373, 85K)

>Don't you have elections in Slovenia?
If you had a brain you'd realize that a multi-party election with 3 or more candidates wouldn't work on that graph.

>low intelligence increases the likelihood of obesity
>low intelligence also increases the likelihood of being poor
lack of nutrition stunts growth, you fucking retard. IQ is mildly heritable but is absolutely minimal compared to nutrition at a young age

and guess what, if you eat junk food at a young age, you're not getting the nutrition to develop your brain.

If you had a brain you'd have checked to see what Slovenia's last election was like, which resulted in a runoff election between two (2) candidates

Attached: file.png (423x554, 122K)

oooohhhhh

I guess I'm just not involved enough in the american election process to figure out you commonly use presidents as variables.

yeah, but we usually don't correlate voter affiliation to race, obesity, etc.

>presidential election

That's just a diplomatic figurehead, here's the clusterfuck from the real elections.

Attached: abc.jpg (567x866, 164K)

They accounted for those factors, you fucking retard.

>yeah, but we usually don't correlate voter affiliation to race, obesity, etc.
The US is highly regional, but not as much as that mong implies. Additionally simple correlations are misused by sophists, in fact there's an entire site dedicated to that:

tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations

Attached: file.png (958x477, 58K)

>Kanazawa 2014
>no mention of nutrition anywhere in the brief

>Belsky 2013
>no mention of nutrition anywhere beyond footnotes

Nah that doesn't control jack shit, did you even look at what you posted? You can be obese but still hit all your nutrients, just with a high caloric excess. You can also be obese with shit nutrition and an underdeveloped brain. Both studies don't tackle that difference, at all.

I get the feeling that you grew up in a spoiled household and still spent your adolescent years drinking Mountain Dew and eating chicken nuggets, which explains why you can't read studies that you gallivant around.

>did a ctrl+f instead of reading the articles
>still couldn't find it
Yikes. You must be one of the low IQ fatasses to be getting this worked up over it.

>he didn't read his own study
Burden of proof is on you to link the exact sentence of the methodology in Belsky 2013 where they control for nutrition.

Good luck finding it, because it's not there.
Also here's one for the road you daft fuck:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3607807/

>The research evidence from observational studies suggests that micronutrients may play an important role in the cognitive development of children. However, the results of intervention trials utilizing single micronutrients are inconclusive. More generally, there is evidence that malnutrition can impair cognitive development, whilst breastfeeding appears to be beneficial for cognition. Eating breakfast is also beneficial for cognition. In contrast, there is currently inconclusive evidence regarding the association between obesity and cognition.

>The cognitive development of the children was then measured at 7½–8 years of age, and it was found that IQ (measured on the WISC) was higher in the high nutrient group, especially with respect to verbal IQ in boys (Lucas et al., 1998). A subgroup of these children (n = 76) was assessed again at 16 years, and a persistent effect of the high nutrient diet on verbal IQ was demonstrated. At this stage, brain MRIs were also undertaken and showed a larger volume of the caudate (which was correlated with higher verbal IQ), but only in males (Isaacs et al., 2008, 2009).

>Obesity is a special form of malnutrition (overnutrition, as opposed to undernutrition which has been previously considered here), because the diet is likely to have low nutrient-density in conjunction with a high fat and carbohydrate content (Tanumihardjo et al., 2007). Obesity is of growing concern worldwide, with the number of overweight and obese children dramatically increasing over the past two decades.

6’2’’ 154 lb here
Im going to try to stop being a skeleton though, gonna eat a bunch starting tomorrow

That's met girlfriends height but she is not even 110lbs. How did American women get that fat?

>lack of nutrition stunts growth

Pretty much nobody is starving to the extent of stunting growth in the western world you fucking idiot.

It's actually even quite the opposite poor people are fat and get too much to eat.

6'2 and 185 pounds isn't skeleton

>Attractive interesting mentally stable women seek out attractive interesting mentally stable men
>They form long lasting happy stable relationships
Who knew?

Attached: 1472760625809.png (441x603, 1.02M)

>tfw 6'1 149lbs
Why are american women so fat?

Attached: 1432411935020.png (1280x720, 1.1M)

I'm 6' 180 lbs, I'm not happy with were by body is and when I talk about loosing weight all the insecure fat girls tell me how skinny I am and make me feel like shit for wanting to better myself like they never will