This is the king of Sweden and his heiresses presumptive

Finnish and french blood in their veins

And British, and German, and Dutch, and Portuguese, etc.

Daily reminder that royalty are mutts.

She looks like the average brown latina though

>Be king
>Want son to be king because that's how its always been unless you literally never have a son
>Government fucks him over
>Passes a law forcing him to make his oldest daughter the heir
C-U-C-K

Attached: giphy.gif (500x375, 491K)

Sweden made that change quite late compared to the rest of Europe.

The inbred blood of royals is weak. Yes, the dynasty was founded by some French peasant but they are mostly inbred Germans.

What's even the point then of being king if you can't choose your own heir?
Modern royals are all face and no bark, bite or balls.

Why don't you have an Earl?

christian MEDS cucked them and stripped away all their old subhuman culture

Aren't they French and didn't they have their royal jewels stolen and sold for weed?

We had jarls until way after we became Christians, but I don't see how that has anything to do with meds, since you never invaded us.

That's what autocratic kings do. We've had plenty of those in the past, but now we are a democracy.

We haven't had jarls for 700 years. It was removed to consolidate power with the king.

>Aren't they French and didn't they have their royal jewels stolen and sold for weed?

No.

we didn't even need to move our asses to cuck you out of your barbaric religion and customs

>No
thelocal.se/20120614/41442
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Bernadotte

I think you're lying.

Because the king has zero power and only exists as a mascot.

>That's what autocratic kings do. We've had plenty of those in the past, but now we are a democracy.
>Democratic King
What a fucking oxymoron

No, see And that's not THEIR "royal jewels". It was the personal property of someone in the family.

They're ""French"" Jews and the queen is Brazilian.

Wtf she's like seven.

Okay, keep electing lesbian presidents then. Sweden will never become a republic (even though our kings were elected at several points in history).

Proof that they are Jews.

Bernadotte is a Jews family.

>lesbian presidents
We've never had a lesbian president and our only female president was pretty great

Enjoy having your country be run to the ground and have your history shat upon and replaced with someone elses.

Fairly certain no law system can force the king to change his inheritance laws. It's there onl to make sure modern royals stay away from politics

Jewish*
Can't into spellcheck today

>We've never had a lesbian president

sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jóhanna_Sigurðardóttir

Whatever, she's a lesbian and she was your head of government. Keep electing those.

I asked for proof of it being so.

>Fairly certain no law system can force the king to change his inheritance laws.
False
>It's there onl to make sure modern royals stay away from politics
This statement contradicts the previous one

>An unpopular lesbian gets voted in as prime minister once in a controversial time when the economy was in shambles and everybody was angry at the right wing parties
>Therefore all we vote for are lesbians
Yeah, keep being mad Hamed
Feminist Sharia Law soon
But its not like you're losing anything, because as your people say yourself, you have no culture anyway.

The cognitive dissonance is palpable.

>being involved with poliics
>inheritance laws
>the same thing

Retard. England has a cobstitutional republic for 2 centuries and in 1930 they had a constotutional crisis becuase the heir apparent married a divorced american

What defines royals as royals is a completely different thing thay what defines what they are allowed to do, and generally rooted in the inheritance laws of the days of autocracy

If the law can fuck with what defines who is a royal and heir, ehich arr system rooted in kingly tradition and preserved BECAUSE OF TRADITION, then there is no point in having royalty.

>people living under republican systems claiming to explain how monarchies work to people living under monarchies and getting mad when they get BTFO
Seriously?

Can't remember where I found that out, it was so long ago. I started diving into their family history, but I really can't be arsed in all honesty. You'll have to either take my word for it or don't.

However, I do remember that Jean was the first king of foreign kin and when he took the throne there were protests where the masses shouted things like "ned med judekonungen" and the like, and Jean addressed the crowd with orders from his men to "saber them down", which cemented the cold relationship between the population and the nobility.

Attached: oy vey.png (762x772, 1.31M)

You sure proved me wrong user
You mad?

>then there is no point in having royalty
That's the point

>Fairly certain no law system can force the king to change his inheritance laws.
How about I let someone else explain why this comment is false
>Because the king has zero power and only exists as a mascot.
So since the king has no power there is a law that forces him to change his inheritance law
Second
>It's there onl to make sure modern royals stay away from politics
I said this contradicts the previous one because first you say that the King has power and sway as he can say fuck you to the inheritance law, but then in this sentence you claim that he doesn't have that right since he's not allowed to take part in politics
You're the retarded one here.

Does the king of Sweden actually do anything? Or is it just like one big photo op like in britain?

I am a different poster. I only said he has zero power which is true, it was removed in the 70s.

Yeah I know, I wasn't arguing with you
I was using your post as a reference

The prince is a bit autistic like the king, Victoria is by far the most fit to become regent

an earl (or jarl in our case) was just that, an earl. kings have been a thing here since way before christianity was even heard of

Inheritance laws are not having power, idiot. if swede goverment is so hellbent on humilliatin they might as well force them to destroy the crown

>Ingrid
hhhnnnggghhh

Do Swedish airlines serve that fermented fish you guys like? Airline food, I know. That’s contextual.

If there is something, in the absolute fucking minimum, that the head of the Royal family should be able to is to decide who takes the thrown after they leave it, and they can't even have that
How is that not "not having power"?

yeah, they just exist for symbolic purposes

Jesus mate you have serious problems with the english language.

Can't you comprehend the difference between "power in matters of state" and "power in matters of crown & family"? These are two different kinds of power and every relevant royal family has theirs based their on old kingdom laws. That privileged status is the only reason they are still "royal" and not just another citizen

If the royal family can't govern itself then the royal fanily might as well disband.

Is it true that the Queen isn’t even from a noble family?

Why are royalties always so fucking ugly?

Unlike most people in media they didn't need looks to get there.
If you go into a random household and made them the royal family 9/10 times they wold be ugly people as well because most people are ugly.

Though that said we Swedes did get two decent looking royal children, but the ugliest one got the crown.

Attached: ste_prince_carl__25951372.jpg (628x650, 311K)

Is there Swedish royalty porn? Like can I see that chicks bush? The older one I mean obviously.

Do Swedish people subject their royalty to nude photography, is what I mean. And is it readily available.

this is your mind on american liberalism

Dude the sickest porn I’ve ever scene has come from Western Europe. Hell we all got to see princess diana’s bush. Don’t be so uptight.

I love the Prisma grocery store commercials they made.

Do western Europe even make porn anymore?
People always go on about Swedish porn like it's the early 70s or some shit. Hell I've been actively looking and there is fuck all out there man. It sucks.

Well you tell me man. All I see these days is Czech street porn and Germans doing fucked up BDSM. At least the Japanese have one good thing going for them and it’s creativity in porn.

Ummm I don't think so sweaty.

Attached: 1517957745493.jpg (1200x730, 561K)

Which one do you support, Jow Forums?

Attached: french pretenders.png (400x267, 161K)